Comments 351

Re: Sony Considering PS6 Delay to 2028 or Even 2029, New Report Says

Orpheus79V

@ProfessorNiggle Yeah that's the part that stings about this if it turns out to be true. I wouldn't mind waiting a bit longer for a typical home console, but I really want that supposed handheld version. For the Switch 1 I double dipped a lot, but with Switch 2 I'm holding off on multiplats with the expectation of playing them portably later on PS.

The Portal isn't viable for me based on my experiences with the remote play app either.
Home connection is laggy and the workplace wifi blocks it entirely lol. Has to be a native handheld.

Re: Code Veronica the Next Resident Evil Remake, Say New Reports

Orpheus79V

@Rich33 Nah, Code Veronica was never RE3. RE3 was a game being developed by a team with Hideki Kamiya as the planner set on a cruise ship. It was set for the PS1 at first until it was decided to be a PS2 game, causing a delay. Capcom wanted a numbered sequel out soon though, so they bumped up Nemesis to be RE3. Kamiya's project became RE4, he became the director of it, switching the setting to a castle, eventually morphing into DMC1.

The misinformation around this primary comes from IGN, who've reported on CV being the real RE3 with no real sourcing. Another factor is CV being announced before RE3, so people assumed it was RE3 because it made sense in that time. Shinji Mikami has also commented that he feels CV is the "true RE3" but that's an opinion of his and not a fact of it's development.

The Sony angle (namely a deal they allegedly had with Capcom mandating RE3 as a PS1 game) also has no truth to it. IGN literally made it up in 2009. The whole thing is probably the biggest Resident Evil misinformation of all time so I don't blame anyone for believing it, I did too for a long time.

This article has quotes from Kamiya himself and RE3's writer laying out all of the above.
https://bioredqueeneffect.wordpress.com/2023/02/14/why-codeveronica-is-still-mistaken-as-having-been-resident-evil-3/

Re: Code Veronica the Next Resident Evil Remake, Say New Reports

Orpheus79V

@JB_Whiting As a correction, while Code Veronica is mainline it was never considered RE3. That title was originally meant for the game that became DMC1. They added the number 3 to Nemesis to sell more copies, and RE3 became RE4 before becoming DMC1. The popular story goes it was a Sony mandate forcing Nemesis to get the number, but it was just a case of Capcom wanting to maximise profit for that fiscal year.

Re: Yakuza's Makers Have Made Another Unforced Error

Orpheus79V

You know, this decision would be far less egregious if instead of being forced to buy a £115 bundle, you could just buy the set of 3, 4, and 5 remasters. I think they delisted that bundle when they introduced the starter pack and complete series bundles. Would be smart to reintroduce it, especially when they will obviously go and make Kiwamis 4 and 5 later as well.

Re: Yakuza's Makers Have Made Another Unforced Error

Orpheus79V

@Darylb88 Kiwami versions being improved is very much subjective. Some content is changed and removed, characters recast and redesigned, balance and pacing differences, etc. Very different and distinct experiences. Kiwami 3 is catching a lot of heat from the newer fans who actually played the original, whereas the negative changes from Kiwami 1 and 2 went much less noticed because most fans post 0 started with the remakes.

Re: Yakuza's Makers Have Made Another Unforced Error

Orpheus79V

Video games will continue to not be taken seriously as an art form when things like this keep happening.

Imagine if everything they remade a movie, they removed the original one from all services and stopped printing physical copies. There would be outrage. Happens all the time for games and some people even defend or downplay the seriousness of it.

It's a problem on both the companies and the consumers who keep demanding remakes of games.