get2sammyb

It's a good price and it looks great, I'm just rubbish with fighting sticks.

It looks nice. The hook is really cool.

@Metonymy Yeah, I doubt marketing's included either. Very expensive game, but it should reach its target eventually.

@DennisReynolds It does sound good lol

Hope it's helpful if you're going for the Platinum! Let me know if you anything's not clear!

Updated. This company is honestly bizarre.

Wow poll results are quite surprising. I think they're easily going to clear the record.

@Robamuffin To be fair, a review can never really tell you whether a game's going to be for you.

Reviews are subjective. The reviewer can only speak to their experience; they can't speak to whether you will have the same experience.

Personally, I think the review is very clear who this game is aimed at and what kind of people would enjoy it.

Do you like older Zelda games like Links Awakening? Do you enjoy challenging Souls-likes? If yes to both of these, you'll probably have a good time with it, as the review clearly states it's very well made for those who find that mix appealing.

@Dalamar But not all Trophies are equal anyway. There are some games you can get the Platinum in an hour; others that take 1000 hours.

Some games are really easy, others are punishingly difficult.

They all have the same value attached, though.

@Matroska I actually don't agree with cheats disabling Trophies either to be honest. And in this game's case, they definitely framed the modifiers more as a "play your way" than a "cheat".

If it's an online game I get it, but I really don't understand who's getting hurt by this in a single player game.

You made all the options and included them in the game, so just let people use them?

@AdamNovice Why do this for a single player game? I think it's cool they put the modifiers in, but it completely defeats the entire point of "play your way".

I just do not understand this decision at all.

@TrollOfWar My opinion is it doesn't make sense for Sony or Nintendo to say if a third-party game is coming to a rival platform.

The calculation is different for Microsoft because it's bringing its own games to those platforms.

It would be weird for, say, Persona 4 Revival to ONLY show an Xbox logo but for Fable to have an Xbox and PS5 logo.

@Rich33 That's true. I guess it'll give a better idea of their short-term direction of travel...

Insider baseball thing but I've never known a game with worse screenshots or key art for media. It's so hard to include a picture that makes this game look clickable and interesting.

@KillerBoy Nah. It's suicide releasing next to GTA 6.

@SuperSilverback @AdamNovice Every single website and social media account is going to post about these things, though. If you don't see them here, you're going to find them elsewhere.

We'd just be knowingly kneecapping ourselves sitting on news/rumours that are otherwise going viral around the web.

Moreover, while it seems likely, we don't even know for sure this will be at the State of Play. For all we know it could be announced in the next ten minutes.

I think anyone worried about "spoilers" for marketing montage would be better off just not visiting gaming websites or social media at all.

@SuperSilverback I'm lost, why would you want to do that?

@Bingbongboyo It's definitely better than GoldenEye if you compared them directly in 2026. But obviously GoldenEye was a hugely important game for the time (and still quite enjoyable today).

@DiggleDog That training montage is absolutely incredible.

@Frmknst The Hitman games were anything but mid, they're amazing.

But I agree with your assessment of Bond.

This is awesome.

@Crimson_Ridley These "betas" are usually just marketing opportunities to be honest. I'm sure it gives them a chance to test the server load... But yeah!

Okay after my initial "zzzzzz" I will say the Korean setting appeals to me somewhat.

@Andee Yep, every DLC character has added new quests and cutscenes and stuff.

@CosmicJester Yes, I think it's fantastic fun!

@BonezKnowz Enjoy!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

@Icey664 Possible, yes

As Liam noted in the article, hopefully have our PS5 review with you in a few days. Codes for that version went out later than the others.

Crazy they started over. New game looks fine I guess, but not feeling the character designs yet.

@Gamer83 Oh nice, you ordered the DualSense! Enjoy!

It was a decent game. I know they probably didn't see the numbers to continue developing it, but I think it probably could have eventually become great with the right support.

The first big update they did made it a lot better IMO. They needed two or three more of those.

@KillerIsD34D You're not the first I've seen saying it. Obviously it's all anecdotal, but Sony needs to be very careful with its customers.

More than enough time.

@PuppetMaster Haha wow I didn't make that connection.

@DennisReynolds Excellent! Happy with them?

I think it's a really good month personally.

@Matroska Just wonder if I might appreciate the remake more by playing the original, but it's a fair point.

I wonder if I should finally play vanilla P4G or just wait for this remake.

@Balaam_ A shame because I think they'll make a good game and, honestly, in this era of Sony, they're going to need all the support they can get...

@omadeli It's such a shame because this game would be ace with a more modern control scheme.

@Northern_munkey No, the PS3/360 version was a completely different game made by Treyarch. That's what makes the PS2 version so interesting.

@Matroska Weirdly I played Xbox and GameCube more than PS2, but I was lucky enough to have all three.

@RoomWithaMoose I loved Agent Under Fire too, although I played it on GameCube.

@TheDaddyOtaku I mean a potential PS Plus perk could be disabling ads, no?

@LowDefAl I think there was also a Toro Inoue one.

WTF?!

@somnambulance Yeah the key art especially screams Weathering With You and Suzume to me. Maybe slightly less so in game, but it's still there IMO.

@TartarusBlack Good luck!

@rjejr I got it wrong about the castle place. I thought that was the next area but apparently not.