Comments 8,302

Re: 'I Feel Cheated and I Want a Refund': Fans Lash Out at New PS5 God of War's Unlockable Local Multiplayer Mode

naruball

@RudeAnimat0r agreed. It's not unreasonable at all. But that's the case for most games from my experience. They say for example, 1-4 players, but you have to look up what that means. 4 players for the entire game? Some sections? Can some join locally and others online? Does it also have bots? Etc...

But, again, a section where it's clearly stated would be much appreciated.

Re: 'I Feel Cheated and I Want a Refund': Fans Lash Out at New PS5 God of War's Unlockable Local Multiplayer Mode

naruball

@Theamazing1 who says they need to buy it immediately? If local co-op from the beginning is a deal breaker to people, they can wait a day or two to make sure it's actually worth their money.

Are we really at a point that doing the most basic research before buying something is too much to ask nowadays? I grew up in a country where refunds weren't a thing unless a product was faulty. If we made a mistake, we learned to be more careful before buying something next time.

Re: PS5's First State of Play of 2026 Tipped for Later This Week

naruball

@UltimateOtaku91 I think it keeps growing the more time they spend online because they see other people expressing similar view with just as much vitriol if not more, so they begin to think it's how one should conduct oneself.

I don't play GaaS games either, but continuously bashing them makes no sense to me. If they fail (which they have so far, Helldivers II being the exception), Sony will stop investing in them. Simple as that. They already have cancelled most of the ones they had in development.

Re: Larian CEO Swen Vincke Sticks His Foot in It Again, Thinks Game Reviewers Should Also Be Reviewed

naruball

Does he, though? I find it hilarious how pushsquare assumes we agree with them and most posts are about how right or somewhat right he is.

Personally, I somewhat agree. I see people's arguments against it, but it's important to remember that there is literally no perfect system that cannot be abused one way or another.

For example, there are some cases of reviewers who are simply terrible at playing games or clearly didn't bother finishing the game they're reviewing. That alone for me would be a disqualifying criterion. We have the same issue in academia where peer reviewing has become incredibly flawed, but still the best system we could come up with.

Re: Code Violet (PS5) - Gooner Shooter Can't Get It Up

naruball

@Leinad7 "which is ridiculous because Horizon series is so dumb, characters, dialogs, lore.. only combat and exploration is fun. But at the same time „PS exclusive” tag makes sales getting higher. Violet game will also sell, even being so bad."

Man, this is hilarious. There are so many ps exclusive games that haven't sold anywhere near as much. Not even a 10th of Horizon's sales. Being an exclusive doesn't always help.

Re: Code Violet (PS5) - Gooner Shooter Can't Get It Up

naruball

@Leinad7 plenty of games have "dolls" and don't sell well. So facts suggest otherwise. Whether you personally felt like the game was empty is irrelevant. It has high scores with reviewers and gamers praising its gameplay.

"If that game was released with main protagonist looking normal or being a dude, it would not sell well and we all know it."

You may want to read my post again.