Comments 274

Re: Attackers Threaten to Take PSN Offline Again This Christmas

professorhat

@Boerewors well, it's certainly a theory, but not one I can subscribe to. The vast majority have no idea what a DDOS attack is and just see it as the company having poor security. The reputational damage of this is far worse than spending some money on extra compute capacity for genuine users.

Re: Attackers Threaten to Take PSN Offline Again This Christmas

professorhat

@Boerewors "more capacity available to them then any hacker could ever use up" - they really don't. They do have a huge capacity, but they have a huge online presence and also run Azure, which is the cloud platform other companies use to run their own IT infrastructure. So they can't just reallocate capacity from these other, arguably more important areas, just because some idiots are swamping the Xbox Live servers with false traffic. DDOS attacks are almost impossible to prevent, but there are solutions to mitigate the amount of downtime they cause. This is where hopefully Sony have improved, so that if something does happen, the service is down for hours rather than days. If they've any sense, they've outsourced it to a company that specialises in this.

And said idiots are certainly not hackers. That's allocating them far too much in the way of skill and knowledge.

Re: Destiny Launches Pricey Level Boosters for PS4, PS3

professorhat

I've had a lot of fun playing Destiny, and it's been great value for money compared to many games I buy. But I really don't like this turn of events. I can live with Silver for things like emotes, but if you can buy your way to a good level (no matter how easy it is to get to that level, and how ridiculous the price is for it), then you're now in uncomfortable territory for me in terms of what the future holds. Goodbye Destiny. It has been a blast. I'm off to play all those great games I missed (Batman, Witcher 3, Fallout 4 etc etc)

Re: Tune in with a PlayStation TV for $19.99 from Best Buy

professorhat

Remote Play works well for it for most things. I noticed Destiny struggled on a couple of occasions, especially if I was playing in a fireteam with others, but it was still playable. For most other game genres it's great, but as others have said, you should really wire it, using Powerlines if you need to.

$20 is a steal for this as a streaming PS4 device (I bought nigh on full price). I do wish it had Netflix, but that's mainly what I bought it for.

Re: Paris Games Week 2015: PS4's Dreams Looks More Like a Nightmare

professorhat

Looks good to me. Essentially, just like LBP, there will be a game Media Molecule create for you to play, but it will just be the art of the possible and creating your own worlds / games and playing through other people's creations will be where the real fun is at.

I love the idea that you can use other people's creations (you could in LBP too if they were published), and the idea that the game will be much like the world wide web, with "links" connecting different worlds and games.

It sounds pretty epic - can't wait to play it!

Re: Destiny's Story Was Stitched Together Using Existing Assets in Less Than a Year

professorhat

Whatever issues there are with the story, Destiny is a fantastic game that gets more than its fair share of hate. It's far and away the best value game I've owned since I was a youngster (when I would replay the same game again and again - I just don't do that as an adult!), even including the cost of the DLCs. I've sunk nearly 200 hours into it, and there's no sign of that stopping any time soon.

Re: This PS4 Commercial Is Going to Sell a Lot of Consoles

professorhat

I think a lot of people will be happy with Battlefront, just because of the Star Wars universe. The beta was dull, but presumably there will be a lot more missions in the actual game, and enough variety in terms of scenery from the movies to keep fans happy. Plus it looks spectacular!

Re: Sony: PlayStation Innovation Is Simply Unparalleled

professorhat

I seem to remember Move being put down as Sony copying Nintendo, but they had in fact been working on the device way before Nintendo announced the Wiimote. I think Sony does innovate, but they spend more time on it and generally do a better job compared to those that rush to market (though obviously the Move is not an example of that!).

Re: Uncharted: The Nathan Drake Collection Looks Insane on PS4

professorhat

Been a Playstation owner since the original, but somehow missed the Uncharted series. I first played it when I got Golden Abyss with the Vita, and saw what all the fuss was about. Then of course played TLOU remaster, so very much looking forward to this and couldn't care less about multiplayer!

Re: Japan's Censored Until Dawn's Most Grisly Scenes in the Worst Way

professorhat

Censorship laws in this country are just as barmy. Show someone being horrifyingly murdered by a maniac with a saw? Sure, no issues. Show a man and a women naked, and having sex - dear god, no (god forbid you even mention a same sex couple! Think of the children!).

I'm not saying (a) should be banned, but you've got to wonder about a society that generally tolerates horrific mindless violence for entertainment, but gets very hot under the collar around an act of love / fun.

Re: Feature: Meet the Man with 40,000 PlayStation Trophies

professorhat

@Boerewors Agreed - I'm rather like @themcnoisy in that I now only tend to get a few games, rather than every title. At the moment, I'm essentially playing Destiny and Project Cars and nothing else gets a look in! At some point I intend to buy Batman Arkham Knight, but by that time, there will probably be something else on the market that trumps it. It's an endless battle! I am looking perhaps to get Until Dawn as the wife expressed an interest in playing along with me (even though she hates horror films!).

I'm also lucky in that we bought a new place last year which has what we call the "shoffice" as it's a mix of shed and office. I work from home, so needed somewhere I could be to make calls, concentrate etc without having a crying baby. The plus side is I've managed to get my old plasma in there, and combined with the PSTV, I've got somewhere I can sneak off and game for a bit while the wife catches up on much needed rest

Re: Feature: Meet the Man with 40,000 PlayStation Trophies

professorhat

@Boerewors hmm, will your family feel the same if you die young? Sorry, it's your life and your choice, but to shorten your life to play games seems a bit crazy to me. My wife is pregnant with our first, and I want to be around as long as possible to see him / her grow. And I really want to grow old with my wife too!

I'm sure there is flippancy in your answer, but it bears thinking about. Decisions you make today may well have horrendous consequences and regrets for your future.

Sorry to bring the whole thing down, it's just how i feel.

Re: EA Doesn't Think You'd Play a Star Wars Battlefront Single Player Campaign

professorhat

@get2sammyb You may well be right, and the argument therefore is concentrate all resources into a great multiplayer in that time limit, rather than put in a single player and make a not so good experience. But if that's the case, just say that! Who knows, I have no statistics of my own to combat this, so it's hard to argue with the man, but I would find it astonishing if true. Certainly I spent more time in single player on the PS2 versions (back when multiplayer was very novel and new experience), and I very rarely even bother with the multiplayer versions of games now - not even in Destiny!

It's a shame, I love Star Wars, this game looks amazing, but I'm beginning to think I won't bother getting it now, at least until it's cheap in a sale, as I just won't play it much if it's multiplayer only. And there's too many other great games out there I could play instead (I've not even bought Arkham Knight yet!).

Re: Gamescom 2015: Sony Had Long and Intensive Discussions Over Horizon: Zero Dawn

professorhat

@BAMozzy Yes there had been level creators in games before. But nothing like the scale of what you could do in LittleBigPlanet. You could literally make your own games in it (one person made a clone of Gradius in it!). If you haven't seen them, I'd recommend looking them up. That was revolutionary and totally new (in my opinion).

Horizon doesn't look like it will offer anything like this in terms of originality (though as I said, if they reveal something that is completely new, I will happily eat my words - I just seriously doubt it's going to happen). And that's not a bad thing - I have no issues with this. Not every game has to be completely new, by a long stretch. But if it isn't offering anything creatively different, then don't go around bandying those terms (again, in my opinion).

Dreams looks to be the next MM incarnation of this originality, and I'm really looking forward to seeing that!

(original reply deleted, and this one edited as I was being needlessly silly with my own self righteousness!)

Re: Gamescom 2015: Sony Had Long and Intensive Discussions Over Horizon: Zero Dawn

professorhat

@BAMozzy I agree, it's not easy to come up with something totally new - I never said it was. But that doesn't mean it should therefore be okay to go around saying something is totally new, when it's clearly not. Even if this was something a bit new, whilst incorporating existing genres, I'd give the guy a break. But it's not, it's an RPG cum 3rd person shooter - there's nothing new at all about it.

LittleBigPlanet, whilst essentially being a platformer, did revolutionise the player's ability to actually create their own levels from scratch, without needing a year's course in computer programming. That was something totally new. Horizon, whilst it looks like it's going to be a great game, really doesn't offer anything like that. Unless of course there's something amazing which hasn't been revealed yet, in which case I'll happily eat my words

Re: Gamescom 2015: Sony Had Long and Intensive Discussions Over Horizon: Zero Dawn

professorhat

@BAMozzy Agreed, but given Guerrilla Games' pedigree, I'd suggest the "shooter" aspect will be the main form of gameplay. Anyway, as I said in my last post, I really couldn't care less what genre it is, the point is it's hardly "completely new" and "totally different" from a creative perspective. To see that, we're really relying solely on Media Molecule now (from a Sony 1st party perspective).

Re: Gamescom 2015: Sony Had Long and Intensive Discussions Over Horizon: Zero Dawn

professorhat

@BAMozzy Clearly lines are being blurred in genres these days. In my opinion, in a game where you will mostly be shooting at creatures from a 3rd person perspective, I would classify that game as a 3rd person shooter. Even though there will be RPG elements to the game, I would still classify that as the main genre. Perhaps others will play it differently, and would thus classify it differently. After all, you could easily just roam around the Far Cry 4 world, and not shoot a thing. Would that not still make it a 1st person shooter - I'd disagree, but hey, toma"y"to / toma"r"to.

The reason I suggested this argument is ridiculous is it's completely irrelevant to the point I was making. I said, "It is a 3rd person shooter so calling it something "totally different" is a stretch in my opinion". Okay, you'd call it an RPG - fine. So substitute that with "It is an RPG game so calling it something "totally different" is a stretch in my opinion".

Everyone happy now? Jeez Louise!