arzis100193

I wonder if they might have delayed to add a campaign and will reannounce at some point.

Good. I hate 60 fps personally.

While it was fun in Black Flag, naval combat just got old quickly. Also riding up on a fort as a viking and taking it sounds awesome.

I'd give it an 8 or a 9. Would be a ten, but that ending is awful. And there are some minor issues that brought the game down for me.

Good. Now April isn't as busy.

My only worry is companies will view this renewed interest in witcher III as people being willing to buy anything tied to movies or shows. Just like the old days.
You know what screw it, bring on the horrible tie-in ports.

The game was way to buggy for me and also very unrewarding. Also backtracking got very repetitive as time went on. Still it had some decent moments but it is nowhere near my game of the year.

Skyrim was the 2nd game I ever bought for my PS3 back then. It really showed me how far gaming had come and made me a fan of western RPGs. While it wasn't very good at launch on PS3, it is still one of my favorite RPGs having put hundreds of hours into it.

For myself, Resident Evil Revelations is the best of the series with maybe 7 and 2 right behind it. Haven't really played thru any others besides 5 [Which was awful except for the random coop player who destroyed the final boss for me].

While the reveals were solid and the trailers were good, I don't feel State of Play is a good platform for revealing games. It just doesn't work and undermines the games it shows by making them feel run of the mill. I think the live crowd is necessary to hype up a game especially for AAA games.

Maybe they can pull off what Square did for FFXIV and make the game so good that it makes people forget about the Anthem we all got.

From the ones I read on Metacritic, it seems to be more about the game being boring than anything else. From a casual audience prospective, I think this game will be disappointing for many looking for what Kojima is known for.

Nice Easter egg. Honestly, I'm glad they are trying to present what a real soldier might encounter while on a mission. Sure it is deplorable that you can kill the baby, but if it didn't let you it would not provide a true sense of realism which is a big selling point of this Call of Duty.

While many had unrealistic expectations, I only expected Last of Us 2. But even that was disappointing because without the crowd reaction of an E3/Gamescom/Game Awards it was a game I can wait for as opposed to the hype built from hearing the cheers of an announcement at an event. The reveal of Joel should have been so much bigger. The other games as well.

That conference was just bad. Nothing was really revealed in a major way. Deathloop and Ghostwire were the only worthwhile reveals but no gameplay made it kind of pointless [Sound cool, but gameplay would have been better]. If I cared about streaming, Orion sounds interesting but other than the Doom gameplay everything was presented in the worst way possible.

Finishing Mass Effect Trilogy and moving on into Andromeda.

At least it sounds like it will have a single player unlike the last one.

Kind of sad because Far Cry 5 is horrible, but good for Ubisoft. Hopefully Far Cry 6 is better.

Good games, but horrible as ps plus games. Unless PlayStation offers more, the cost of plus is to high.

I think the problem is that schools use the percent system and anything below an 80 is bad. So as kids grow up and get involved in games or otherwise they use this mentality from grade school as thus see 7 or below as bad. Hell I do as well, but that hasn't stopped me from buying games but did taint the experience.

I really wish i saw what everyone seems to see in this game, but I don't. Its lack of explanation on the rules of the puzzles is mind-blowing. I play games to relax and enjoy a good story or gameplay not have a game piss me off by not explaining how a puzzle works so i can solve it and others like it.

I will buy them for games i like, but usually wait to play them until all of the story dlc is available to play

If they really cared, they would make it work. I mean Xbox somehow made it work.

As long as microtransactions are not invasive or used to prolong the game [looking at you Shadow of War], I have no problem with them. However, they shouldn't hide the best cosmetics behind pay walls or insane grinding.

Am I missing something here? The violence in Last of Us looks normal to me.

I am so ready for this game.

At this point it is a bargain bin game for me. I don't trust Bethesda to deliver a good online game that allows you to play how you want without being affected by other players.

The Press Conferences were not as good as previous years, but overall I'd rank them as:
1. Microsoft - Aped Sony's layout of previous years and made it work.
2. Square Enix - Didn't waste time and just showed what was coming.
3. Sony - Games saved this crappy conference.
4. Ubisoft - A few notable games saved this conference.
5. Bethesda - They need to learn to shut up and show the games.
6. EA - Same as Bethesda. They presented Anthem horribly.

I really hope there is more than the 4 they said otherwise this conference will be boring.

I'm fine with it as long as they invest in their games with the proper care like Sony does.

Currently, I see Days Gone coming out on top. Anthem looked bad when EA showed it so unless they show more, I don't think it will do as well as EA expects. Days Gone on the other hand should do fine unless reviews are bad or there are issues at release.

That conference was bad to me at least. Battlefield V was shown horribly. Fifa was there but I don't care about it. Unravel Two was also shown but again I'm not interested. Sea of Solitude got me interested. Command & Conquer was really bad. And finally Anthem was also just boring to watch. I was hyped prior to its reveal but now I think I'll wait or play it if my brother gets it. Overall didn't like it.