Comments 126

Re: Most of Highguard's Dev Team Laid Off Just Two Weeks After Live Service Shooter's Launch

ECharles

@Andee Not a terrible state but a valuable lesson for the gaming industry. Markets are essentially large, ongoing experiments: millions of people try ideas, products, and ways of working to see what actually creates value. Profit is the reward for getting it right, while losses are the signal that something isn’t working and resources should move elsewhere. Mistakes aren’t a failure of the system—they’re the mechanism by which it learns. Over time, this trial-and-error process tends to favor better solutions and discard worse ones.

Re: Best Single Player Games on PS Plus

ECharles

@Scottyy I just finished Returnal for the first time a few weeks ago and it's shot up to one of my favorite games. It was difficult at first but gets fairly easy once you get the rhythm down (turning on "always run fast" was key). I can see getting really frustrated without being able to save the game that was implemented later.

Re: Hogwarts Legacy, Mortal Kombat Publisher Warner Bros Bought for $82 Billion by Netflix

ECharles

@ThomasHL "Consolidation is always bad". Silly. Acquisitions often allow assets to be used in more efficient ways including necessary streamlining. Does is always work out? No, but that is not important. Mergers and acquisitions are the means to determine whether a more efficient firm can exist. Knowing the outcome in advance is impossible because the market information doesn't exist yet. +1 creative destruction

Re: Ubisoft Is All In on Generative AI, Says It's as Big a Leap in Tech as the 'Shift to 3D'

ECharles

@Medic_alert "Abject poverty" in the US is upper middle class in many other countries. What matters is income mobility, and as I said before, wealth is mostly associated with age (the young will at be top when they retire; the extremely wealthy don't hinder this outcome). Inequality is natural and good in a market economy. Equality would mean the same wage for every job and person. Housing and taxes are different topics. With housing, you want to increase supply by making it very easy to build (not the case now because of regulations). The wealthy would move to new housing that would free up old homes that the young can afford. Have you looked at a US projected debt chart lately? This country is facing default/bankruptcy in a few decades. The debt is expected to be 200% of GDP by 2040 (banana republic levels). Increasing taxes won't come close to fixing. Huge entitlement reform including "cuts" will have to occur to avoid.