Comments 515

Re: Xbox Now Selling PS5 Games for $80, Joins Switch 2 in Price Increase

Dudditz09

I'm glad in a lot of ways I have less time for gaming, I don't have the time or inclination for a 100 hour jaunt with a game, so have found myself buying more strategy and indie games over the past few years.

I know it's been raved about over the past week or so but something like Clair Obscur is the perfect point IMO, great game, great length and at £50 not breaking the bank.

Might be a good thing for the smaller studios and push people more towards these games, out with the annual FIFA and COD crew

Re: Poll: Do You Use PS Stars?

Dudditz09

I've picked up a fair chunk of store credit which is nice.

I'll do the tasks or whatever that gets points. Couldn't care less about the take with the collectables, seems pointless to me

Re: Game of the Year: #5 - Balatro

Dudditz09

I picked this up on a whim on the Play Store, mainly due to the noise around it and the price. I figured I would maybe play a few rounds then never touch it again .

It has made me use my Chromebook again, its basically now become a tablet for Balatro.

It's in my top 3 for this year along with Manor Lords and Astro (Metaphor would probably be in there but I've yet to pick that up).

Re: Sony Boss Says 'PCs Are Difficult to Set Up', Firm Will Focus on PS5

Dudditz09

Ha PCs are too complicated. Trying to convince himself or the casual gamer?

Never mind, they really aren't difficult at all.

Do I prefer to plug in a console and play? Sure, but I like to tinker as well so a PC would be no problem to me, the additional cost isn't an issue, and if I'm laying down £700+ to game (and really it would be closer to £900 by the time we include a disk drive, stand and additional dual sense), it sure as hell won't be on a console where I am locked into an ecosystem and locked hardware.

If this is the price point where console gaming is heading towards for the next gen, I'll be taking my money and putting it into a PC where I can play what little I play online for free, where I can sink as much or a little as I want into it at any given time, where I have a multitude of store fronts and sites to purchase games, where I can take a mouse and keyboard for my strategy games, a control pad to play Forza, then maybe switch it up to Spiderman afterwards.

Yeah, consoles are more convenient to a point, but I think if this pricing is the way forward, it will have reached the point where the convenience just doesn't provide value for money for me.

Re: PS5 Pro Announced, Costs $700 and Out in November

Dudditz09

Now that I have settled down, surely this now sets the tone for the pricing for the PS6.

And if that's the case, I'll switch fully over to PC, if I'm paying that sort of money for a console, which will have a mid gen refresh in 3/4 years, I'd rather up my budget and control my own upgrades.

Re: Soapbox: Astro's Playroom PS5 Did Live Service and You Didn't Even Notice

Dudditz09

See for me the best example of live service, done fairly well by Sony, is GT7, new cars, challenges, tracks etc.

To me that was live service done quite well, although it's been a while since I played, so maybe that's changed?

A game like Astros Playroom getting a wee update here and there after launch isn't even a stretch to claim it's live service, that's total nonsense, otherwise every game is live service.

Games that get patches for bugs fixes, optimisation etc, or small free content update (say akin to The Witcher 3 when they released a dozen or so freebies) are not live service.

Live service is an ever evolving game, whether f2p with battle passes etc, full priced and evolving like GT7 or Splatoon, or worse, full price with MTX like EAFC with Ultimate Team.

We as a community all know what live services is taken to mean, this article reminds me of that guy at a party who gets drunk and goes all devils advocate thinking he real smart.