Barrymore

This game is a waste of time and energy, it's just too stressful. I binned it (returned it) after 2 hours.

If this had been a patch to tune down difficulty then I'd be prepared to reconsider, but this is just tone deaf.

does it include the dlc? (cyberpunk)
Edit: just realised it doesn't, so it turns out this isn't very generous, a 4.5 year old game being released in its non complete version.
I understand that the dlc is recent, but you can't expect me to think this is anything special.

Good, get it cancelled and get them working on a solid single player game with an added on multiplayer mode.

Mistakes have been made, but its time to recognise them and move on.

The sheer waste of money and human productivity on this live service rubbish is scandalous.

Almost unplayable.

Imagine a world where these resources had been put into some single player games, and how exciting it would be to look forward to them right now.

Oh well, never mind. At least astrobot was good.

Excellent article.
I agree with all points. Live service games are dishonest addictive and shallow. Corporate greed is a reason they are appealing, at no benefit to the consumer. Want to feel like you are being scammed? Get yourself investested in crap like fortnite.

Herman Hulst should be sacked. He has no business being at the helm of a games company, particularly one with the history playstation has.

Character looks fine, story looks interesting. I'm not a fan of anything ND has done since the first Jak and Daxter sadly, not really my style of game and I've been burnt buying their games only to stop playing and not return, so a demo would be nice.

Regarding the politics, I do feel like ND are making a political statement with the character, so you are bound to wind some people up. Pre-emptively turning youtube comments off shows they knew this as well.

I haven't enjoyed anything from ND since Jak and Daxter 1, and I've tried most of their games.

I actually gave it extra effort to trying to enjoy them due to all the glowing reviews, but in the end I gave up. This made me sad to not enjoy sonething almost everyone else appeared to like.

I imagine there are some like me out there who feel the same way. Sadly I won't be spending money on this, however I'd play a demo to see if this game is different from uncharted or tlou. So I'd offer my time to give this a chance but I won't offer money.

And no offence, but I wouldn't trust a review of this game, as I haven't agreed with the previous ones (Jak and Daxter 1 excluded).

TLDR, demo please.

Not really sold on the naughty dog game, though i didn't enjoy much from them since jak and daxter 1. So I am surprised to see it top this poll, though I am aware I'm in the minority for disliking the cinematic experience type games. There wasn't too much to go off in the trailer to tell if it will be a similair experience, but I'd sooner go watch a movie.
Elden ring wins it for me, even if it is a weird spinoff.

@TimeDelayedGamer love your avatar

Sad for individuals, but I'd sooner it get permanently cancelled.
Never have been interested in never ending, yawn fest, live service rubbish that makes me feel like a mark in some sort of grift.

I'm not looking forward to it, it looked a bit naff in the trailer, and the characters look a grey and lifeless.

Oh piss off Sony, between this and live service bollocks, you are just as grubby as all the others.
Time for me to recede into the past and play on my old consoles, or just touch grass.

Oh piss off. More chasing scummy live service trends which make me feel like a mark rather than a customer. Time to touch grass.

I'll pay £50 for a bloodborne 60fps upgrade.

I already didn't care about any of these live service games. When I play a game I don't want to feel like I'm some hapless mark bring duped out of their money (like some poor sod putting £40 into a fruit machine on pay day).
I hope Fairgame$ and Marathon get cancelled or scaled back, and I'm glad that the live services as the future is looking bleak.
Considering their rich heritage, I'm surprised to see Sony falling for this.

Oh and just to go a bit old school, I preferred it when multiplayed modes get tacked on to single played experiences such as Goldeneye and Halo.

Though there are succesful modern examples like CoD or even titanfall (less succesful but presumably better than 25k), so this isn't really an archaic concept either.

Why not use Sonys significant single player experience to entice us in, and then make us stick around for the multiplayer.

On one hand I am pleased, it gives a message to publishers to what games aren't wanted want loud and clear, bland live service shooters are old hat.

I don't know if the culture war stuff has played into it, but it has also featured on deidetected.com, i imagine this would only put off a tiny proportion of people, but a lot of people do care about that sort of thing.

On the other hand I'm sad, it's well made and I can only imagine the trauma and stress of watching something you put vast amount of time into come to nothing.

I don't like the game, and it makes me sad.
edit to clarify: I'm sad I don't like the game, the game itself is well made and I just wish I liked it.

Bungie Bungle.

Summons, blessing, buffs, spirit ash, level up more. All viable options to beat something without needing to learn and respond to the boss moves.
To be honest these games give you so many ways to get around road blocks compared to many others.

Microsofts grasping for profit at all costs is detestable. It's evident in their PC OS also. I'll pirate these games before i buy them. ***** them.

To be blunt, it's crap.

Too many games, so little time. Even at "free" I'm not sure really. Beginning a game and commiting time to finish it is a cost I often struggle to pay.

I played the other games multiple times, but this one feels dull to play through again. The account wide progression sounds flashy, but subsequent characters are "buffed" by stat and skill points from your first play through, making them feel boosted and easy.
You are even encouraged to skip the campaign, so you get straight to the dull grindy crap. This shows a lack of understanding in what makes playing a game fun.
Then again the dull grindy seasonal stuff is where they sell the battle passes, so it's obviously their goal.

Sometimes constructive criticism and nuanced debate is a waste of time. I believe this is one of those times.

F-off microsoft, you are greedy and wholly deserve to own activision blizzard king, three fallen, grubby avaricious companies.

Your slimy tweets are embarassing and clearly try to mask this greed. I won't miss any of the games that will now be skipping ps5 anyway.

Glad I bought this pysically so I can return it. I really don't like the feeling of being made a fool out of by EA and Push Squares overly generous review score.

Gets a 5 for releasing too soon. I actively don't want to play this until the patches sort out the stuttering. Amazon inform me i have until 28th of May to return this.

Unless patched I will be returning and waiting for a very deep sale, or deliberately buy 2nd hand to deprive them of a sale.

Patch doesn't do anything. Cutscenese related to the first boss fight still stutter in exactly the same way. Tried on performance and none performance mode. Guess we will need to keep waiting. Got my finger hovering over the return to amazon at this stage...

In other news, I'm getting good at the first boss! But I refuse to play any more of what seems to be an excellent game without this stuttering sorted.

I keep hearing discourse about the pc version being a mess. The ps5 version is also a mess, same issues and I can confirm this.

No excuse for this, and frankly Push Square, your review made light of the technical issues, and was too generous in it's score. Reviews are there to guard against this, otherwise what's the point.

In my opinion review sites and publishers are at fault here, and they should both look at their processes.

I'm not someone who generally cares but these issues are so bad, I can get behind the review bombing.

I keep hearing discourse about the pc version being a mess. The ps5 version is also a mess, same issues and I can confirm this.

No excuse for this, and frankly Push Square, your review made light of the technical issues, and was too generous in it's score. Reviews are there to guard against this, otherwise what's the point.

In my opinion review sites and publishers are at fault here, and they should both look at their processes.

I'm not someone who generally cares but these issues are so bad, I can get behind the review bombing.

First boss down, the gameplay is great perfect difficulty balance and great exploration. However, performance is a big issue, the cutscenes stutter, framerate drops are consistent, even on performance mode.
This does bother me, especially when the cutscenes are otherwise great. Unless you are desperate I'd just wait for a patch.

As a rule of thumb - if microsoft is pushing something as the next big thing, it isn't.

@UltimateOtaku91
Couldn't agree more. Just buy your games. Preferably physically.

Nice spoiler. Would have loved to have just discovered this naturally but oh well. Maybe next game.

I find your Lack of 13 disturbing.

Simply put;

It's overpriced massively. Number one aspect that affects whether or not someone makes a purchase of pretty much anything.

At this price point you don't get anything that is particularly ground breaking anyway, so failure is inevitable.

It hasn't got backwards compatability. Sony are you joking? This is such a major drawback, and limits the already small games library even more.

I do honestly wonder about Sony sometimes.

It was obvious that this would happen. Sony should stick to their current model, and only add older games to the service, ones that had a significant launch sales period. I honestly would have been happier with only retro games on the service in addition to the 2 games a month model, but microsofts aggression forced their hand. These retro or older games aren't always feasible to actually play, you may not have the older console, so this gives the service real value.

It really makes me admire nintendo's subscription model more, but they have the luxury of having an iron grip on most of their retro first party games licenses still.

Ultimately, just buy your games, physical preferably so you actually own it. Call me a dinosaur, i beg you.

Keep this as a 3/10. If it's a 8/10 now then maybe it should have released in its current state.

This game deserves to sell well

I dislike all these subscription services. Paying for multiplayer server access with a random sprinkling of games was fine. Just buy the games you actually want, it will be cheaper in the long run.

Remember, sony and microsoft wouldnt push subscriptions unless they made more money from customers through them.

So go out there, be a dinosaur, buy a physical copy. You will actually own it, and can play it as often as you like. Maybe only buy the few games you actually want. Who knows, the market might not be flooded with thousands of games if that happened.

No Demons souls ps3 still

Premium, for 7 days then back to essential. No Demons souls ps3 despite being on the EU official site list. Classic list is genuinely poor, where's mgs, ff8, silent hill? where's gitaroo man, rez ps2 version? Where's ff13? Nothing premium about it.

So, if Demon's Souls ps3 is not region exclusive, where is it?

Did Europe get shafted? Several games missing, ones that are listed on the official page. Demon's Souls ps3 for example.

No Demon's Souls Ps3. Classic selection feels underwhelming to me. I'll just continue to physically own my games, like the dinosaur I am, thanks.