Alps_Stranger

I'm going to be fairly unhappy if this is the norm. 60 fps needs to be available on base PS5. If it isn't, we're just going to go through this again with the next generation of consoles. We have consoles BECAUSE they're not PCs and we don't want to update them constantly.

Someone finally noticed the one thing this string of surprise hits had in common.

RIP Heartland. You died so XDefiant could live for a couple extra months before being devoured by Call of Duty.

Aquatic Adventure Awkwardly Acquiesces

The original game also had multiplayer which I heard was kinda fun. I never played it because I rented it from GameFly and it had one of those passes to prevent renters from playing the MP. Remember those?

Got the platinum just last week so I will absolutely dive back in tonight for some kaiju action.

The first game's mission structures were amazing and left so much room for alternatives that aren't spelled out for you; I just want more of that. Better facial animations are great and I'm glad we'll have them but it's not what's bringing me to the game.

Could this mean that CoD isn't the #1 selling game of the year for two years running? If Madden or the College Football game do well enough, and enough people play CoD on XBox, is it possible?

They don't want to become framerate snobs. It happened to me after only 2 PS5 games. It's a problem.

Currently grinding my way to the final couple trophies so the timing couldn't be more perfect.

Love it! Can't wait.

Nothing for me except maaaaybe Tunic. But it feels difficult to say it's a bad month when one of the biggest franchises in the world is included.

The only thing I care about is what this means for Kingdom Come: Deliverance and Friends.

My favorite game from PS4 is getting a sequel! This is as excited for a game as I think I've ever been.

If this was different in any way from Ubisoft's usual practice, I can see getting upset. But it's not. This is the case with every Ubisoft open world game. I look forward to more "water is wet" articles.

How are people confused? Nearly every Ubisoft game has a season pass that gives access to DLC. I usually find everything above that (cosmetics, grind reducers, etc.) unnecessary. I also usually find the game and season pass on sale for $20-$30 a year after release. Pay attention people.

I never cared about framerates until I got the PS5 and had a consistent 60 fps across many titles. It's ruined me. I know people say that ironically but it has literally ruined 30 fps for me. It looks like trash.

So we got Far Cry: Avatar and we're getting Far Cry: Star Wars. I think it's time for Far Cry: Joes vs. Cobras. I actually enjoy the Ubisoft checkbox open worlds for what they are so I'm only slightly joking.

PlayStation is now run by a numbers guys who doesn't care about the product even a little bit. I need to see that someone... ANYONE at PlayStation is interested in making money via good games instead of exploiting a captive audience. I'm not confident.

Been looking forward to this one so this is fantastic news.

Hoping a game fails feels weird and bad. But that's what the push towards live service has brought us to. I hope they all fail so hard that developers finally realize that Epic fell ass backwards into a live service success and no one will ever replicate it directly. Make a fun game first. They understood this before Fortnite. Maybe they will again.

I have a hard time wrapping my head around a console fanboy getting upset over a game going multi-platform. And yet I have an even harder time imagining a single one of those XBox fanboys being appeased by this statement.

I anxiously read every one of these articles dreading the day I come across, "Embracer to shutter Warhorse Studios." I want Kingdom Come 2 and I'm not very confident that I'll get it.

I switched from XBox 360 to PS4 and haven't looked back... except for the fact that I miss Gears of War. I'd buy a collection on day one.