Phelaidar

@dark_knightmare2 I don't know if its the case here, but it seems sine most reviewers get their games for free, everything is the same to them at one point.
They get alienated and don't realize that games have prices AND that games take money to make.
This game is a budget title made by a small team, and it is a great game if put into that perspective.

This reviews actually makes me mad. Wish they were this angry and picky with Triple-A games.

This is a harsh look on a game that is not even Triple-A.
It is a budget game and actually manages to be more entertaining that a lot of blockbusters that only 15% of buyers actually complete.
Sure it is not the prettiest game out there, but hey... it doesn't have the same money.

The pacing in this game is amazing.
The game is just a powerhouse on Game Directing and Art Design.

If this is their response to Gamepass, this is quite underwhelming, since, you know... GAMEpass.

F*** that.
Don't blame it on users.

Games are expensive, gamepass is showing that in a dangerous way.

People are more willing to pay a subscription than full price, which honestly, subscription is really bad since you don't own anything.

I bet more more people would buy new games if they werent $60 (PS4) or $70 (PS5).

And the income curve would be higher.

Sell more at lower price, get more income from increased sales numbers.

Not only that, his game was very buggy at launch, so no justification there. It wasn't a good game at launch.
His whole interview sounds just bitter.