Comments 95

Re: Steam Deck's Install Base Estimated to Be About a Third of PS Vita

JokerBoy322

Well if EVERYTHING is an Xbox then that kind of applies here too. You can now install Steam OS on pretty much all the current handhelds as far as I'm aware, making all of them "Steam Decks". Hell, I turned my Steam Deck into a PS Portal, so spin this however you want but it doesn't change the fact that Steam has become a huge contender. If that wasn't the case, Sony wouldn't be desperate to get their games on Steam's storefront.

Re: Assassin's Creed Shadows Pre-Orders Are 'Solid', in Line with Odyssey

JokerBoy322

@Darylb88 lol, ok. Like the "data" they also had to back up Star Wars Outlaws being a huge hit too. However Ubisoft does NOT have over 300,000 pre-orders. From their own meeting with investors they said they had "around" 300,000. That could be any number, it could be 270,000 and they just rounded up. They've been caught doing it before...

Re: Rumour: Gears of War to Make PS5 Debut with Full Crossplay in Trilogy Collection

JokerBoy322

This is ridiculous, Microsoft lost the plot. This sucks for PlayStation gamers mostly though becuase now that Xbox is just an unofficial 3rd party developer, that means we're stuck with Sony being lazy due to no competition. I pray to God that Steam and Nintendo REALLY start bringing the heat here.

All that said, I'm going to buy a physical copy and possibly never open it, just to take in that we never thought we'd see the day of Gears on PlayStation.

Re: Square Enix Vows to Deny Toxic Fans Its Wonderful Games, Services

JokerBoy322

@Wiceheid my entire point went way over your head. I know what the policy says on paper. That's not what I'm even arguing about. The issue is by who's standard are we going by when we say "socially acceptable bahavior?" I think we can all agree we're living in a time where that is a massively debated talking point. That's my debate with you. I understand and agree with everything you've said on the surface. The probelm is that due to them leaving the wording so open to interpretation that alot can go wrong. Who's in charge of carrying out this policy is also a big question as well that can become an issue. We've seen many people clashing over political and social issues in the past and its not out of the question to assume that's going to come up rapidly here when moderators for this policy have to decide if a certain influencer or person of a conflicting ideology is in question, whether they will abuse this newfound power or not. History proves that they most likely will. That's my problem with this because too much is left wide open for abuse.

Re: Square Enix Vows to Deny Toxic Fans Its Wonderful Games, Services

JokerBoy322

@Wiceheid can you definitively define "actions that exceeds socially acceptable behavior or is harmful."? You can't. They leave that open for a reason. Nothing in the policy says they will "specifically ban you becuase you didn't like their DEI policy." It doesn't have to say that. They left the wording wide open with very little context on purpose. That way they can punish anyone they don't like if that person speaks in a way they don't like. I'm not going to argue this further. You want to believe in the policy being heaven sent to save the industry, then go ahead, I won't stop you. However don't try to gaslight me into thinking Square Enix is doing this out of the goodness of there hearts at a time when they're losing record profits and have been facing fan backlash on decisions they've made.

Re: Square Enix Vows to Deny Toxic Fans Its Wonderful Games, Services

JokerBoy322

@Wiceheid i suggest you read it again and understand how, in context, it COULD and most likely will be abused. Especially once other companies follow suit. Don't be naive. These companies are losing millions over people publicly calling them out on their bad practices and refusing to buy their games. This new policy is designed to attempt to put a stop to that, becuase if the public can't openly communicate to each other over problems with a product then people never find out about problems with the product. This isn't rocket science.

The policy over people making death threats is such a small part of this policy as well, and yes, those people should be punished, however that is not the entire policy here and it's not the part the majority of people are talking about.

Re: Square Enix Vows to Deny Toxic Fans Its Wonderful Games, Services

JokerBoy322

@IamJT that might be right and probably is. However it won't matter. By doing this it will kill consumer confidence in Square Enix. The wording to the new ruleset is so vague that people will be too scared to speak up on actual issues with the games and Square Enix will slowly die off as toxic positivity kills them.

Re: Square Enix Vows to Deny Toxic Fans Its Wonderful Games, Services

JokerBoy322

@IamJT they can't deny services in America to individual people and banning IP addresses over opinions would violate free speech laws in America. This whole thing is a bluff. It's scare tactics to get people in line becuase Square Enix is losing money and an embarrassment within the industry right now. I'm sure they won't have any issues making this work in some countries but there are many in which this won't fly. Either way, whether it works or not, this is bad publicity that Square Enix DOESNT need right now.

  • Page :
  • 1