There have been rumours for over a year now that PlayStation has been particularly aggressive behind closed doors as it transitions to a new generation. Timed exclusives are part and parcel of platform launches, and while Microsoft has spoken out against them, its Japanese rival has never exactly hidden the fact that it’s willing to open its wallet in order to gain a competitive advantage.
Around a year ago, Sony CEO Kenichiro Yoshida suggested that the manufacturer’s next-gen strategy will focus primarily on hardcore gamers, as it attempts to transition “taste makers” to the PlayStation 5. He suggested that the firm will go out of its way to please its biggest fans, with a large focus on exclusives, major third-party publishers, and independent developers.
And while Xbox continues to entrench itself with services and potentially disruptive business models, we’re seeing Sony’s approach. Its software selection, which spans major first-party titles like Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales and Horizon Forbidden West, is looking huge for the PS5’s first 18 months on the market – and the rumours are that it’s still got much, much more to show.
But the Japanese giant is clearly not stopping there: there are intensifying rumours that it’s signed a deal with Square Enix to secure some form of exclusivity on Final Fantasy XVI, and online scuttlebutt suggests it won’t be the last third-party title it has locked down. We’ve already seen two major titles from Bethesda, Deathloop and Ghostwire Tokyo, announced as timed console exclusives.
Sony may have replaced its old slogan, but it still wants PS5 to be the best place to play – and it clearly believes content is key to that. Marvel’s Avengers will include Spider-Man as an exclusive playable character on PlayStation platforms only, and while the fallout relating to this is massive around the web, the reality is that the title will sell best on Sony’s systems.
It’s unfortunate for fans of other formats, but PlayStation’s primary goal is to make its brand more appealing than the competition, and partnerships like this do ultimately move the needle. Given its latest financial results, Sony has both the incentive and the market share to make these timed exclusives a reality – and clearly it’s going to use that to its advantage.
It’s nothing new, though – not really. Back in the PS1 days, the manufacturer used its chequebook to associate series like Tomb Raider with its system – a business transaction that helped establish Sony’s very first format as a staple of the mid-to-late-90s pop culture zeitgeist. This is a tried and trusted strategy that has served the Japanese giant well for decades, and it’d be naïve to expect it to abandon a successful tactic.
As these deals accumulate, there’ll be pushback against PlayStation – perhaps rightly so. But the Japanese giant won’t be phased: its goal, as alluded to earlier, is to make the PS5 the best place to play, and it intends to achieve that with exclusive content. The platform holder’s first-party pipeline is clearly primed to deliver, but it’ll be those additional deals it signs that’ll prove the real difference maker.
Do you feel Sony's being far too aggressive with its approach to timed exclusives and content partnerships, or is it merely attempting to add value to software for future PS5 owners? Do you think there are better ways it could transition players to its next-gen system? Make us a moneyhat in the comments section below.
Comments 75
As a PlayStation gamer this can only be a good thing. Could we perhaps see the new Xbox as a final console from Microsoft if they lose this generation?
@Boucho11 Probably not, they're looking much further ahead anyway.
Moneyhatting developers to keep games off of other consoles for a period of time always sucks, no matter who does it. Besides, in the end, timed exclusivity doesn't dramatically change the library of a console.
If PS5 turns into the home console space equivalent of the EGS, I might have to re-evaluate my support for them.
100% love this approach..squash that Xbox bug... SQUASH IT!
let Sony reign. If MS gives up the fight and it is indeed the last xbox console release so be it.
Sony is clearly doing something right here and continues to. In the absence of MS (if that were to happen) that would give more money to Sony to pour into games so it's a win win really
This sucked when MS did it during the 360 days, and it will suck now.
You want exclusive content, pay for entirely new exclusive games, don't pay to block other gamers from accessing the entire game.
@rumple1980 Competition for these companies is always a good thing — it means they fear being caught slacking. The game industry with a healthy Microsoft is a good thing, it pushes Sony to do even better.
@Ralizah
it depends if its 1-3 month or a year. 1 year timed exclusive is just sick
Not being to aggressive at all. Playstation is trying to make its consoles and ecosystem this best for its players. No one on a Playstation is harmed by any of this. I suggest Xbox and PC players go to their respective platforms and ask for them to do the same. Nothing wrong with making your platform better than your competitions
Im not a fan of it. Its first use where I got burned was Microsoft getting Tomb Raider for a year before it came to PlayStation.
@OmegaStriver there's nothing wrong with that though imo. We have no entitlement to get a game wherever and however we want it. Xbox ponyed up the cash to make that happen. If it means that much to ya, get an xbox to play it. If not wait a year
@Medic_Alert ah I’m definitely not saying it’s what I want, I just don’t see what their strategy will be going forward?
It's not something I'm a fan of, at least not with already established franchises. What made me chuckle was Phil Spencer speaking out against it and then doing it anyway, at least Sony does it without pretending it's above such things.
@get2sammyb what do you mean?
@rumple1980 Less competition is never a good thing. If Sony doesn't have to work for your money, what gives you the impression they would. Spending less money increases their profit margins and looks better to shareholders.
All I know is that I’ve been playing ghost of Tsushima since release every single day and each time I am dumbfounded by how amazing it is. I just want Sony to keep on doing whatever it takes for them to keep delivering experiences like that. I’m all for it.
@Ralizah
"If PS5 turns into the home console space equivalent of the EGS"
You mean... like now?
Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy
Final Fantasy VII Remake
NieR: Automata
No Man's Sky
Yakuza 0
Yakuza: Kiwami
Yakuza: Kiwami 2
"I might have to re-evaluate my support for them."
Bye-bye.
I'm not a fan of these kinds of third party exclusivity deals, regardless of whether it's Microsoft or Sony doing it. They suck for those that are unable to access the exclusive content.
Ms speaks out about something it did egregiously last gen, and raised the bar on how ***** the practice is by miles. I'm not mad when Sony does it, since hardly in business do you ever go backwards. So ms may not like them now, but if Sony let's up, and ms does it again, then they may lose ground. Plus ms is still buying exclusives.
Although I can understand the argument against Sony’s strategy, they have to separate themselves.
Xbox has made it clear that this next generation is about building an ecosystem for their brand.
Whereas Sony is doing the opposite in that they are getting the games they want, making the games they need and doing whatever possible to solidify that PlayStation is “The Best Place to Play” and that PS5 is the dominant console of the next generation.
Very exciting and interested to see how it pans out.
@Medic_Alert cool. Cheers for the info.
Don't have problem with exclusive ps5 games since I plan to buy it on launch 😁
Console exclusives that Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo fully fund themselves are one thing. However, bribing a publisher or developer for timed console exclusivity is completely different and something no one should be cheering.
Ps5 domination again.just like ps4 did.the haptic feedback on the dualsence controlker and ssd is a big selker.plus the games on ps5 will look amazing.especially the exclusive games.word up son
not if you want to use a dualshock 4 though, blocked, Welp, whilst third party PS4 controllers will work 🤣 disgusting
@ShanetheSaint88 So, you’d be fine if Microsoft threw money out there and Cyberpunk, COD, EA games, GTA6 and more became timed exclusive for a year or so? You’d just go out and buy an Xbox?
@OmegaStriver Yes. I own an xbox already 1. And 2, if those games meant that much to me that i needed to play them day 1, i'd do what i had to do (if i could of course.) I don't see anything worng with companies making their platform better for the users, or potential users, of that platform. That competition might make Sony go out and get the next cyberpunk completely exclusive to its platform. And so on and so forth. A rising tide raises all boats.
Wasn't it just last week or the week before that the Xbox crowd was cheering the thought of not just Batman, but the entire DC Universe of characters being exclusive to Xbox platforms? Even if I realize it's unlikely AT&T sells all the IP, it just shows how whiney and hypocritical some people are.
Same goes for those here saying "I hope this squashes Microsoft and Xbox!!!" You should root for both companies to continue to improve as heightened competition forces both to continue innovating and delivering better value for their customers. Rooting against one or the other is not only childish, but it signals you either support a lack of innovation and value, or are too ignorant to understand that is what Sony or Microsoft dropping out of the market would most likely lead to.
How many timed exclusives did Xbox announce at their latest event? And it was Xbox at the start of the 360 lifecycle getting exclusivity deals with GTA 4 DLC and CoD Maps that really kick-started this trend.
Xbox took their foot off the gas in the second half of the 360 lifecycle by chasing the casual Wii market, and have been treading water ever since.
If the shoe was on the other foot, as MS has proven in the past, these deals would be done on the Xbox platform. Sony managed to come back and compete against the 360 with the PS3, and absolutely smashed it with the PS4.
People arguing that this is anti-consumer? Well I'd say to them that in the long run, competition like this means the consumers win. Thank you, Xbox, for making PlayStation better.
I think theyre doing exactly what they should be doing.
@SONYofficial < clearly a troll account.
Timed exclusivity is rubbish. It's either exclusive, or it's not. Making one platform wait because you were paid to hold it back on that platform is not right.
@get2sammyb
'fazed'
Nonsense like this only makes games worse for all of us in the long run, if Sony do it then Microsoft will at some point. It's one thing to licence a character to make an exclusive game that makes sense, but to lock away a character on a multiplatform game is just dumb.
@Gr8VngnzN4esAngr Preach
@Richnj I agree RE: Xbox 360. The console started strong, but, by the end of its life, its library was just roundly inferior to the PS3's. A lot of that was down to its reliance on timed exclusivity antics.
Sony will end up in the same place if it adopts the same strategy.
@Octane lmao the SONYofficial guy's comment to me is already gone. He must have really gone hard with the trolling to get smacked down by mods so quickly.
CrossfireX, Phantasy Star Online, Scorn, The Ascent, The Medium, STALKER 2, Warhammer 40K Darktide, Tetris Effect: Connected, Yakuza 7.
These are all titles money hatted either recently or at the Microsoft showcase for timed exclusivity and content deals.
It's a little bit silly to act like these practices are not done on all sides of the competition. It just seems like Sony gets the most backlash for it, for whatever reason. Probably because they are able to leverage their market share to get bigger name titles that make a bigger impact.
A timed exclusivity for Final Fantasies is better for everyone. Square gets to focus on just one platform and cuts development time...
I'm sorry but I want Sony to invest in it's ecosystem in every way it can. And the best way of doing that is exclusives.
Spider-Man has been printing money so if the opportunity to take advantage of that in a 3rd party game then why shouldn't they? Sony aren't in the business of pleasing xbox gamers because they want you to ideally play on a PlayStation.
1st party exclusives are more exciting so like for example it would be way more exciting to see Sony bring back SOCOM than have the typical timed exclusivity for CoD.
My take from this article and a couple of others is that 'scuttlebutt' is @get2sammyb new fave word!
It's funny how 'gaming sites' and 'the internet' last Gen just ignored Microsoft getting Mass Effect and Bio Shock and other big games for years before they came to the PS3 and 'the internet' and 'gaming sites' were ok with that?!?! Hmm, funny that Oh + Microsoft got one of the biggest DLC to at the time, the GTA4 'Gay Tony' one + I remember on N4g.com how the Xbox owners insisted that they would never come out on the PS3 to. I was right at the time then, they did in the end
I love PlayStation exclusives but a timed exclusive is not something I think or care about.
BREAKING NEWS: company make console and say console that company make is best console
Timed exclusives are the biggest waste of money I've ever seen. Use that money on your first party studios and get out more lock in exclusives.
@Boucho11 this is the last console generation of hardware as we know it. In 6-7 years everything will be streaming unfortunately.
I'll be skipping any game I know is timed exclusive until it comes to PC, where I can play it better. FF7R burned me with the console limitations because of Sony money. Luckily that was the absolute top of the few "can't wait" games, so they won't be fooling me again.
@Mafia_Man19 I wouldn't be so confident on that assumption personally. Stadia seems to be like a giant money vaccum for Google right now and stuff like Game Pass and xCloud are definitely not being treated as replacements for dedicated hardware, but rather companion pieces or alternatives.
to me is a perfectly acceptable business model, each company needs to try to sell their brand and are free to do it their way.
I don't truly like when an established franchise goes exclusive or timed exclusive, but is to each developer to decide the risk to take, FF7 seems to have done ok, on the other hand Tomb Raider hurt it's brand quite well and if this continues it'll happen often. Is a gamble for game makers and Sony or MS too
If They Are Opening The Wallet Then They Need To Go And Buy Some More Studio's
@Ralizah lol yeah, I noticed it too.
@DeepSpace5D That's exactly it, when 360 had tons on deals going on wasn't a big deal. But when Sony does it , the industry loses it's mind . Sony just the underdog , remember when reports said ps4 wouldn't sell much lol.
Exclusives make perfect sense from a company’s perspective, but it is anti-consumer
@Medic_Alert Competition is healthy and Sony have stated this many times.
That's 3 Japanese Giants in this article 😂
Eh, I stand by it, exclusives should only be from first party devs, other than that it should be the same content across the board. Also, I understand Sony throwing money at devs during the ps1 days as they were the new kid on the block and needed to create a following, I don't think they really need to do that these days with the amount of brand loyalty they have (112 million ps4 sold is nuts).
From the beginning of the article referencing old article from WSJ. That was BS. Sony never said the PS5 was a niche product for hardcore gamers. (And anyone using their brain for a minute would realise it sounds off) I know it's sort of considered a 'fact' by most of the press but its complete BS.
It was reported that way by the same guy who keep misleading everyone.
Stuck with PlayStation last 3 generations. I am not going anywhere, so fine with me.
I feel like Sony wants me to be happy as a PlayStation owner. Yes, they want my money, but they want me to be smiling about having parted with that money. It's not "Here's some games, bye" - No, they want to make Playstation my gamer home, and so far, it is. I just wish they'd stop forgetting I sometimes have to go out in the world - R.I.P. PS Vita (I still daily carry one!)
Why the picture of the Square Enix PS5 game for this article? There are PLENTY of times Square Enix simply ignore Xbox with the release of one of their games. Even games that come to PS4, Switch and PC with no Xbox release and sight. Sony and money has NOTHING to do with it in these instances.
All of this talk about exclusive content for the PS5 only makes it worth the money. Benefiting on your chosen platform is a good thing for the consumers who bought it.
Microsoft were perfectly fine with timed exclusives when it came to stiffing PlayStation gamers for a year with Rise of the Tomb Raider. Now they know PS5 is going in hard with the model, they’re ***** their pants.
@Bondi_Surfer Depends. I never really liked the idea of third party exclusives but first party games should absolutely be used to attract consumers to a specific platform. That's the reason I stuck with PlayStation and Nintendo for 3 generations straight thus far and will continue to do so. I understand if the game is funded by said console maker it would make sense to keep it on that platform as compensation, but timed exclusives and independently published third party exclusives just need to go honestly.
Yea,I'm not fond of timed exclusives and DLCs, however I'm getting sick of all the negativity and everyone taking it too seriously. We are talking about video games and it's never a big deal. Yes I was very annoyed about RotTR multiplat, exclusive then timed exclusive yada yada because Spencer was confusing everyone. I like to know what's going on from the get go. BUT it's only video games ffs. There are tons of them.
Not many Xbox fans complained when MS was very aggressive with 3rd Party Exclusives for X360.
This is all just residue of great planning and execution that really started with the PS3. Sony had its back against the wall and even though they were a year late and a much more expensive proposition than the X360 they managed to squeek out ahead in the last generation.
Not sitting on their laurels they really dug into what the PS4 would be in a very holistic approach (that they play tested with the PS Vita). That gave way to over 100 million in sales for PS4, PS4 Pro which has put them in a very good position to negotiate these deals for PS5.
I feel like all MS really did was make a machine that they could advertise with more FLOPS. Sure they did make a couple of smart studio buyouts. They didn't seem to bring their A-game with the console architecture. Its an impressive box, but the PS5 seems more well rounded.
Sony would benefit with an additional developer...
@playstation1995 Just FYI, and it's not really relevant to the article, but with the Xbox One having already had impulse triggers this whole generation, and with the Switch doing it's own thing with HD Rumble, Sony is actually the last one to the party in bringing haptic feedback to its controllers. It's great of them to get with the times, but it's not going to be a system-seller.
@Fath
Hi man. Your misinformed. What s in the xb1 controller is very different and no where near. Google it. No worries, I know a lot of people make the same mistake.
@anon42 Your comment to @Ralizah sums it up perfectly. This is exactly why PC gamers hate the EGS. They have brought a closed system console practice that consoles have done for years, nigh on decades, to the open PC platform. Sony and Microsoft have been doing it for years, people were just purposely ignoring it because it benefitted them or were just not paying attention.
Timed exclusives can benefit players of both consoles.
One set get to play the game earlier, the other can the game a year or two later for the same price sometimes with all dlc included.
@Fath. Sony feedback is special.and the ssd with theyre first parties.sony will easily beat x box again.word up son
I have no intention to tell Sony how to spend money, but I've often said that I personally couldn't be further outside the "exclusivity partnerships do move the needle" sentiment if I tried. If I can't accommodate a console into my life, its exclusives lose the entirety of their hardware appeal boost - there's not much difference between not being able to play the game on a console you own and on a console you don't own. I would have long taken measures towards acquiring stuff like PS3, Wii U, XBox One... but as long as they're all destined to be glorified dust collectors for most of the year, what's the point? Likewise, "You can't play this PS5 game anywhere else" will not be much of an incentive in the situation where I can't play said PS5 game on PS5 either.
Then again, no one said Sony necessarily viewed fully employed 30-something geezers like me as "hardcore gamers" anyway.😆
Exclusives don't stop anyone from playing a game. Anyone can buy the console if they really want to play it.
Sony is at least up-front about it, rather than spouting hot air and bulls*t for months about how they "don't like it" and then doing it anyway. Either Phil Spencer is a massive hypocrite, or he has no real say at Xbox and got over-ruled by the marketing department.
After the 360 debacle (RROD)....I stick with sony
@playstation1995 Well, for the sake of agreement, I can at least get behind Sony's ssd being a game-changer. Loading data's been a bottleneck for a while now, and clearing that up should be pretty huge. Word up, as they say, indeed.
@Grimwood Add Sucker Punch, Insomniac games and Guerilla to that list
I don't really see how Sony's stance is any different than Microsoft's.
Microsoft has bought a LOT of companies to make exclusive games for their system. Sony has bought a LOT of companies to make exclusive games for their system. This did not change this generation, on either end (Fable, Halo, etc... are still locked to Microsoft platforms).
So really the question is about 3rd party, and Microsoft are far from the saints they pretend to be. When will they end the Parity Clause?
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...