So basically neither are without fault and fanboys obviously won't acknowledge this reality. Regardless, preordering is pretty dumb as they will hit shelves in months to buy anyway, aside from the fact that being an early adopter is dumb due to the possibility of something going wrong and not worth the vastly for something that wont have much to offer immediately at launch while the majority of games are on PS4 which is a good thing for those who have patience and wait.
Aside from that text wall reiterating your opinion, you're the one necesitsting this unnecessary back and forth over what is, in fact, a minority opinion. Comments outside of this are actually irrelevant. Regardless, that whole bs justifying your opinion is, in fact, verbose and redundant nonetheless and the comments you see from me are in response to the text wall slew of ***** YOU have thrown about.
Anyway, I know first a fact you're incapable of letting this go rather autistically, but under what pretence were you trying to convince me that thus was remotely an intelligent decision to drag this out over your opinion? Besides, asserting your opinion is all you have in light of nothing else to say.
With all that said, it obviously stands to reason that a trophy hunter would have popped the game on to then check for trophies they have amd ones the do not. Therefore, it makes all the sense in the world for the games trophy lost to arrange itself based on your last play session. Further, you haven't exactly given me any basis to say that more people care about this and I reitterate time and time again that trophies dictate the amount of people that may care about that being somewhere between 1 percent in regards to certain trophies people hunt.
Lastly, I'm not arguing against changes or that the UI is perfect, however, this is a tiny arbitrary thing and that the current method generally makes more sense, because again, it obviously stands to reason you will be playing the game to then search for or look through trophies. Again, none of that information the fcat it's your opinion and not empirical fact; rather it's your preference, but there's hardly a consensus either side to make baseless claims. Get over it, dipshit LMFAO.
Fyi: your expectations aren't necessarily unreasonable per se, but the fact you implied Sony have to 'get right' would mean it wasn't functional before and that there was a consensus about what was better on something trivial implying what currently exists is terrible. Alas, that's opinion and not fact, thus why I am dismissing it as nothing more than a logical falalcy concerning the mentality you have. Anyway, I'm just gonna end this brief FYI by saying that good UI adapts to people and therefore why thr order of what was last played makes way more sense and is way more convent, as pretty much most aren't this bothered or anal to go through trophies alphabetically, not that the majority bother at all, but I'd like the think the point is starting to sink in of you got this far .
Based on he verbose alone I take it you're one of those people who let pride interrupt logical thinking. I mean, now you have been called out you're evidently throwing a temper tantrum and trying to make your problemmy problem. I never disputed the importance of UI, however, this aspect is perhaps far removed from any kind of perspective and the generally irrispective of the UI focus in regards to what it the ps4 UI does well: adapt. Furthermore, it actually makes sense to order things based on when you played them, since you would logically load the game up to then hunt for trophies, and frankly any idiot with half a brain would realize that makes sense. Again, I haven't actually seen this arbitrary "issue" voiced before as a trophy hunter myself, well, aside from you, whom I am rightly clarifying as a vocal minority in this instance since I also belong to that group who does not share that contention over something that is trivial in all sense of the meaning.
Secondly, if you had a shred of comprehension skills, then you might have ascertained how the point of ordering things based on recent play session was, in fact, a doozy of a valid response concerning a UI that's geared at being adaptive/ logical. This is very much your issue with it and a singular "issue" that you call a 'flaw', however, it is otherwise irrelevant to most and far from broken to be classified as "flawed" by all sense of the meaning; rather it is different and you take issue with that, so let's not confuse two very different things, semantics aside.
Lastly, I have no doubt Sony will tweak the design cues and slightly change how you interact with the UI, however, statistically speaking, there's only a small percentage of people who care about this and you can yet again look at trophy stats to ascertain that regarding the percentage that actually collects them, which is very much contrary to the assertion you are making and the blatant implications more would care if it were changed, which again is, in fact, a unsubstantiated claim based on what we can currently observe, because at best it would be inconsequential but different in the most negligable way.
In conclusion: You're really wasting your own time with this obtuse act and your bias for how YOU think things should be which is nothing more than something indicative of a vocal minority stance. In the end it just boils down to cognitive dissonance and a classic case of annoying stubbornness to save face. So again just to reitterate, so you may retain at least something, move on if you can't handle reality, but your opinion doesn't make the subject and your opinion any less arbitrary. I mean, for someone with an opinion you seem awfully surprised someone has one about yours with contention.
'My standard isn't that high' despite the fact you have arbitrary issues on things that aren't a deal breakers in perspective of what the console is an does first and foremost, suffice to say nitpicking. Regardless, it prioritises what you have played recently which is logical considering how that would make more sense than alphabetical order.
Furthermore, you can literally jump into your trophies from the quick panel whilst in the game to make hunting easier. Anyway, that doesn't ignore the fact you just contradicted your statement and backpedaled on what you originally said. The point still stands that trophy hunting is fairly niche, based on the trophy statistics alone, meaning that a UI tweek is unlikely to get people to trophy hunt regardless.
Lastly, this is coming from a trophy hunter myself and if you want proof I can drop my PSN. I just relaize that the "problem" is arbitrary and that not many care that much about 100 percenting games for this to be such a huge deal, nor does it ignore the success that the UI is in general with its no bs simplicity and ease of use, all things considered. This only appears as defense when I have to out your arbitrary issue into perspective. Again, at no point did I imply things were perfect, but you can't please everyone and they have done a good enough job for this not to be taken all that seriously, especially considering everything I said in the 2nd paragraph.
It's not being lazy It's just not up to your standard and is quite frankly an irrelevant thing to most. I'm not saying things can't be improved but those trophy hunters are still statistically a small portion of gamers on the whole. You can't even deny that based on the statistics of who collect trophies. Regardless of the UI, getting people to grind games for trophies won't be decided by UI. In fact, that is down to the trophy required set by the devs and the game itself.
I think the part you fail to understand is the economics and the fact they won't run well. See, these kinds of people are irrelevant and also likely to wait to buy a console, which would be smart cosnodering digital is insanity priced and the only means aside from a service, but that's a rabbit hole for another time. Regardless, by that time the console will have depreciated and thus affordable, however, if history is any indication, most have no problem with a 400 pounds console or 450, obviously the conversion rate may be different but the trend is the same. It's not a big ask and doesn't take long to depreciate and you wouldn't be unfair in assuming people would want the best, even of they are casuals and the lowest common denominator. Regardless, I see no point in these people caring when said titles will be available on current gen until such a time they upgrade, whereby that original price will be more appealing and why they will gravitate to the more powerful series X. Also, your argument has a major flaw when you consider the package as a whole. As it has been pointed out before, the quality deficit cannot be understated when the xbox one X series X enhancements won't be seen on the series S and that's a big deal of you care about last gen games playing their best.
Cool, except that it's a game UI and not Android. That trophies thing only applies to a statistically small portion of gamer based on the trophy stats themselves when discussing anything that isn't bronze. Obviously a dedicated thing such as PSN profiles would be better, since what is its intended purpose and focus, but that's not the case when gamers just want to game and Sony have nailed the focus.
It's Sony, not Xbox. Games come first, not a clusterf*ck of self-congratulatory promotional bs and a million revisions just to kinda get close to the point: games first.
That's not how hype or suspense is maintained. Their ps5 hardware showcase was an unparalleled success. They have no obligation to listen to opinionated malcontents. Also, game development is way easier and a game like Horizon and Gzow already has the textures and assets, so all they need to do is to drop the shadow maps (because ray tracing, duh) and scale the resolution accordingly. Regardless, the SSD has been demoed and actually affects gameplay and level design where it wasn't possible before. Suffice to say, you can expect a far longer wait and performance deficit on last gen hardware. It really isn't hard to understand.
I find it hilarious how people have whined excessively about the times Sony have announced stuff, yet they singlehandedly broke YouTube records concerning a gaming streaming event. Face it, they know how suspense works and keeping people wanting more, which as it turns out, is far more effective than saturating your product with information way before release like xbox. As for preorders, granted, it's a bit of a mess, but also the fault of vendors deciding to put preorders forward early, but that's irrispective of the fact there will be enough available and not a lot generally jump onto he bandwagon so early, that, and the fact preordering anything is the dumbest trend in gaming. Regardless, The majorty of the sales will be sustained over the coming years, not months. You people need to have some patience.
It's a ubisoft game remaking a game in a franchise that is dead and abandoned since it got ground into a fine paste originally. This is just the peak of their ineptitude and serves and nothing more than a consolation prize when held to any kind of modern standard for remakes. Lazy only scratches the surface of this bs.
Then you surely understand that current gen will still be around for a while or the fact a casual wouldn't care and would probably play on mobile with a Bluetooth controller. Hell, even a basic PC can fun Fortshite and they're from subscription policies to play online. Regardless, even if that is the case, paying 250 for a console just to play a handful of games is false economy and the most pathetic excuse I have ever seen.
Oh, you mean on hardware that is not worthy of being called "next-gen" and is pointless/ laughable. Good for those on an unwise purchase. This is basically like a glorified Xbox one X and devs have already called out the bs about ease of scalability in regards to performance. I see this as just being an unnecessary obstacle for dev time on a platform that should be unified in performance by now. Halo has already been delayed because it looked like dog sh*t and, worryingly of all, was not even running on the hardware itself. What does that say, aside from 343's ineptitude? You'd think Xbox would have learned their lesson from the SAD edition that flopped and was almost unanimously panned. 400 or less on very decent hardware, on the no doubt cheaper PS5 digital edition. This means Sony has been handed a win with their proposition and flexibility with a performance that is the same. 250 may seem like a good deal, but it's not when you actually look into it.
You guys must not know how marketing works and what hype is, nor how huge resource it is for selling any new thing to people. I mean, let's face it, being dull may very well just be a prerequisite for being an an an admin for this website these days. Regardless, as soon as you take away the mystery, the hype mostly dies with it and gives way to anticipation to get the thing. I mean, clearly, the hype is playable with many ready to pounce at that preorder as soon as the price and links are live. The point is there are approximately 100 mill ps4 users potentially jumping aboard, so let's not understate the situation this pertains to and how they are playing it right by keeping people wanting more by giving out just enough info. I may suggest getting over it and report on something that is actually newsworthy while developing some patience. This was the kind of bs that met the pre-announcement of the PS5, yet look how that turned out... let's just say "record-breaking" kinda speaks for itself.
It's timed exclusive and that's what really matters, because of guess where people are going to play it first and guess what system they will play it on. The whole point is to get people on your platform and is a smart business tactic.
But who cares when you have a controller jack, an mic built into the damn controller and an option to run the thing via USB or at least piggyback off of an HDMI. Optical audio sucks and is pointless taking up space just for a feature most won't use.
Odd time to release a crisis remaster when the PS5 is less than 4 months away... i mean, unless they're planning a "port" or alredy have plans to release a PS5 version. Hopefully they don't pull a scummy move and make you pay 3 times for the game, technically speaking.
So pretty much xbox atm, besides the whole 3F audio and UI, of course. Chill. COVID had a huge part to play in this console chess game and neither console is benefiting from the situation, but it looks like Sony are more prepared. Again, this correlates with what we seen this gen at E3 when Sony skipped it, baring in mind they had their first parties lined up and were working on PS5, meanwhile xbox were hyping 3rd parties and doing the usual damage control.
More like xbox's shtick atm, between being obsessed with hardware and old games, their currently library is suffering. Besides, if the new games look anything like halo infinite, that's probably a good thing lmfao.
Comments 24
Re: Reaction: Spider-Man PS5 Debacle Shows Sony Is Out of Touch
@suikoden
Yet they still pulled out with sales despite xbox briefly having the illusion of an advantage lol.
Re: PS5 Pre-Order Mess Put into Perspective as Xbox Buyers Are Also Forced to Scramble
So basically neither are without fault and fanboys obviously won't acknowledge this reality. Regardless, preordering is pretty dumb as they will hit shelves in months to buy anyway, aside from the fact that being an early adopter is dumb due to the possibility of something going wrong and not worth the vastly for something that wont have much to offer immediately at launch while the majority of games are on PS4 which is a good thing for those who have patience and wait.
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
@ThroughTheIris56
Aside from that text wall reiterating your opinion, you're the one necesitsting this unnecessary back and forth over what is, in fact, a minority opinion. Comments outside of this are actually irrelevant. Regardless, that whole bs justifying your opinion is, in fact, verbose and redundant nonetheless and the comments you see from me are in response to the text wall slew of ***** YOU have thrown about.
Anyway, I know first a fact you're incapable of letting this go rather autistically, but under what pretence were you trying to convince me that thus was remotely an intelligent decision to drag this out over your opinion? Besides, asserting your opinion is all you have in light of nothing else to say.
With all that said, it obviously stands to reason that a trophy hunter would have popped the game on to then check for trophies they have amd ones the do not. Therefore, it makes all the sense in the world for the games trophy lost to arrange itself based on your last play session. Further, you haven't exactly given me any basis to say that more people care about this and I reitterate time and time again that trophies dictate the amount of people that may care about that being somewhere between 1 percent in regards to certain trophies people hunt.
Lastly, I'm not arguing against changes or that the UI is perfect, however, this is a tiny arbitrary thing and that the current method generally makes more sense, because again, it obviously stands to reason you will be playing the game to then search for or look through trophies. Again, none of that information the fcat it's your opinion and not empirical fact; rather it's your preference, but there's hardly a consensus either side to make baseless claims. Get over it, dipshit LMFAO.
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
@ThroughTheIris56
Fyi: your expectations aren't necessarily unreasonable per se, but the fact you implied Sony have to 'get right' would mean it wasn't functional before and that there was a consensus about what was better on something trivial implying what currently exists is terrible. Alas, that's opinion and not fact, thus why I am dismissing it as nothing more than a logical falalcy concerning the mentality you have. Anyway, I'm just gonna end this brief FYI by saying that good UI adapts to people and therefore why thr order of what was last played makes way more sense and is way more convent, as pretty much most aren't this bothered or anal to go through trophies alphabetically, not that the majority bother at all, but I'd like the think the point is starting to sink in of you got this far .
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
@ThroughTheIris56
Based on he verbose alone I take it you're one of those people who let pride interrupt logical thinking. I mean, now you have been called out you're evidently throwing a temper tantrum and trying to make your problemmy problem. I never disputed the importance of UI, however, this aspect is perhaps far removed from any kind of perspective and the generally irrispective of the UI focus in regards to what it the ps4 UI does well: adapt. Furthermore, it actually makes sense to order things based on when you played them, since you would logically load the game up to then hunt for trophies, and frankly any idiot with half a brain would realize that makes sense. Again, I haven't actually seen this arbitrary "issue" voiced before as a trophy hunter myself, well, aside from you, whom I am rightly clarifying as a vocal minority in this instance since I also belong to that group who does not share that contention over something that is trivial in all sense of the meaning.
Secondly, if you had a shred of comprehension skills, then you might have ascertained how the point of ordering things based on recent play session was, in fact, a doozy of a valid response concerning a UI that's geared at being adaptive/ logical. This is very much your issue with it and a singular "issue" that you call a 'flaw', however, it is otherwise irrelevant to most and far from broken to be classified as "flawed" by all sense of the meaning; rather it is different and you take issue with that, so let's not confuse two very different things, semantics aside.
Lastly, I have no doubt Sony will tweak the design cues and slightly change how you interact with the UI, however, statistically speaking, there's only a small percentage of people who care about this and you can yet again look at trophy stats to ascertain that regarding the percentage that actually collects them, which is very much contrary to the assertion you are making and the blatant implications more would care if it were changed, which again is, in fact, a unsubstantiated claim based on what we can currently observe, because at best it would be inconsequential but different in the most negligable way.
In conclusion: You're really wasting your own time with this obtuse act and your bias for how YOU think things should be which is nothing more than something indicative of a vocal minority stance. In the end it just boils down to cognitive dissonance and a classic case of annoying stubbornness to save face. So again just to reitterate, so you may retain at least something, move on if you can't handle reality, but your opinion doesn't make the subject and your opinion any less arbitrary. I mean, for someone with an opinion you seem awfully surprised someone has one about yours with contention.
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
@ThroughTheIris56
'My standard isn't that high' despite the fact you have arbitrary issues on things that aren't a deal breakers in perspective of what the console is an does first and foremost, suffice to say nitpicking. Regardless, it prioritises what you have played recently which is logical considering how that would make more sense than alphabetical order.
Furthermore, you can literally jump into your trophies from the quick panel whilst in the game to make hunting easier. Anyway, that doesn't ignore the fact you just contradicted your statement and backpedaled on what you originally said. The point still stands that trophy hunting is fairly niche, based on the trophy statistics alone, meaning that a UI tweek is unlikely to get people to trophy hunt regardless.
Lastly, this is coming from a trophy hunter myself and if you want proof I can drop my PSN. I just relaize that the "problem" is arbitrary and that not many care that much about 100 percenting games for this to be such a huge deal, nor does it ignore the success that the UI is in general with its no bs simplicity and ease of use, all things considered. This only appears as defense when I have to out your arbitrary issue into perspective. Again, at no point did I imply things were perfect, but you can't please everyone and they have done a good enough job for this not to be taken all that seriously, especially considering everything I said in the 2nd paragraph.
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
@Rhaoulos
Doubt it. They have always had a minimal no bs UI philosoph. Games will always be the first and foremost priority.
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
@ThroughTheIris56
It's not being lazy It's just not up to your standard and is quite frankly an irrelevant thing to most. I'm not saying things can't be improved but those trophy hunters are still statistically a small portion of gamers on the whole. You can't even deny that based on the statistics of who collect trophies. Regardless of the UI, getting people to grind games for trophies won't be decided by UI. In fact, that is down to the trophy required set by the devs and the game itself.
Re: Kena: Bridge of Spirits Takes Two Seconds to Boot on PS5
@Number09
Also, the people you talk about are casuals and xbox are trying to keep current gen around a bit longer. Seems kinda redundant if you ask me.
Re: Kena: Bridge of Spirits Takes Two Seconds to Boot on PS5
@Number09
I think the part you fail to understand is the economics and the fact they won't run well. See, these kinds of people are irrelevant and also likely to wait to buy a console, which would be smart cosnodering digital is insanity priced and the only means aside from a service, but that's a rabbit hole for another time. Regardless, by that time the console will have depreciated and thus affordable, however, if history is any indication, most have no problem with a 400 pounds console or 450, obviously the conversion rate may be different but the trend is the same. It's not a big ask and doesn't take long to depreciate and you wouldn't be unfair in assuming people would want the best, even of they are casuals and the lowest common denominator. Regardless, I see no point in these people caring when said titles will be available on current gen until such a time they upgrade, whereby that original price will be more appealing and why they will gravitate to the more powerful series X. Also, your argument has a major flaw when you consider the package as a whole. As it has been pointed out before, the quality deficit cannot be understated when the xbox one X series X enhancements won't be seen on the series S and that's a big deal of you care about last gen games playing their best.
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
@ThroughTheIris56
Cool, except that it's a game UI and not Android. That trophies thing only applies to a statistically small portion of gamer based on the trophy stats themselves when discussing anything that isn't bronze. Obviously a dedicated thing such as PSN profiles would be better, since what is its intended purpose and focus, but that's not the case when gamers just want to game and Sony have nailed the focus.
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
@Rhaoulos
It's Sony, not Xbox. Games come first, not a clusterf*ck of self-congratulatory promotional bs and a million revisions just to kinda get close to the point: games first.
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
@Flurpsel
That's not how hype or suspense is maintained. Their ps5 hardware showcase was an unparalleled success. They have no obligation to listen to opinionated malcontents. Also, game development is way easier and a game like Horizon and Gzow already has the textures and assets, so all they need to do is to drop the shadow maps (because ray tracing, duh) and scale the resolution accordingly. Regardless, the SSD has been demoed and actually affects gameplay and level design where it wasn't possible before. Suffice to say, you can expect a far longer wait and performance deficit on last gen hardware. It really isn't hard to understand.
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
@Arugula
But far more importantly: successful. COVID-19 hasn't made anything easy, yet in spite of that, they deliver.
Re: PS5 User Interface Reveal Is Coming, Says PlayStation Boss
I find it hilarious how people have whined excessively about the times Sony have announced stuff, yet they singlehandedly broke YouTube records concerning a gaming streaming event. Face it, they know how suspense works and keeping people wanting more, which as it turns out, is far more effective than saturating your product with information way before release like xbox. As for preorders, granted, it's a bit of a mess, but also the fault of vendors deciding to put preorders forward early, but that's irrispective of the fact there will be enough available and not a lot generally jump onto he bandwagon so early, that, and the fact preordering anything is the dumbest trend in gaming. Regardless, The majorty of the sales will be sustained over the coming years, not months. You people need to have some patience.
Re: Prince of Persia Remake Doesn't Look Any Better in Screenshots
It's a ubisoft game remaking a game in a franchise that is dead and abandoned since it got ground into a fine paste originally. This is just the peak of their ineptitude and serves and nothing more than a consolation prize when held to any kind of modern standard for remakes. Lazy only scratches the surface of this bs.
Re: Kena: Bridge of Spirits Takes Two Seconds to Boot on PS5
@Number09
Then you surely understand that current gen will still be around for a while or the fact a casual wouldn't care and would probably play on mobile with a Bluetooth controller. Hell, even a basic PC can fun Fortshite and they're from subscription policies to play online. Regardless, even if that is the case, paying 250 for a console just to play a handful of games is false economy and the most pathetic excuse I have ever seen.
Re: Kena: Bridge of Spirits Takes Two Seconds to Boot on PS5
@Number09
Oh, you mean on hardware that is not worthy of being called "next-gen" and is pointless/ laughable. Good for those on an unwise purchase. This is basically like a glorified Xbox one X and devs have already called out the bs about ease of scalability in regards to performance. I see this as just being an unnecessary obstacle for dev time on a platform that should be unified in performance by now. Halo has already been delayed because it looked like dog sh*t and, worryingly of all, was not even running on the hardware itself. What does that say, aside from 343's ineptitude? You'd think Xbox would have learned their lesson from the SAD edition that flopped and was almost unanimously panned. 400 or less on very decent hardware, on the no doubt cheaper PS5 digital edition. This means Sony has been handed a win with their proposition and flexibility with a performance that is the same. 250 may seem like a good deal, but it's not when you actually look into it.
Re: Sony's Sending Out Yet Another Wave of PS5 Emails
You guys must not know how marketing works and what hype is, nor how huge resource it is for selling any new thing to people. I mean, let's face it, being dull may very well just be a prerequisite for being an an an admin for this website these days. Regardless, as soon as you take away the mystery, the hype mostly dies with it and gives way to anticipation to get the thing. I mean, clearly, the hype is playable with many ready to pounce at that preorder as soon as the price and links are live. The point is there are approximately 100 mill ps4 users potentially jumping aboard, so let's not understate the situation this pertains to and how they are playing it right by keeping people wanting more by giving out just enough info. I may suggest getting over it and report on something that is actually newsworthy while developing some patience. This was the kind of bs that met the pre-announcement of the PS5, yet look how that turned out... let's just say "record-breaking" kinda speaks for itself.
Re: PS5 Indie Kena: Bridge of Spirits Fronts Game Informer Magazine
@RayNick
It's timed exclusive and that's what really matters, because of guess where people are going to play it first and guess what system they will play it on. The whole point is to get people on your platform and is a smart business tactic.
Re: PS5 Doesn't Have an Optical Audio Port
But who cares when you have a controller jack, an mic built into the damn controller and an option to run the thing via USB or at least piggyback off of an HDMI. Optical audio sucks and is pointless taking up space just for a feature most won't use.
Re: Crysis Remastered Name Drop Removed From PlayStation Access Video
Odd time to release a crisis remaster when the PS5 is less than 4 months away... i mean, unless they're planning a "port" or alredy have plans to release a PS5 version. Hopefully they don't pull a scummy move and make you pay 3 times for the game, technically speaking.
Re: PS5 UI Concept Imagined by Animator
@lacerz
So pretty much xbox atm, besides the whole 3F audio and UI, of course. Chill. COVID had a huge part to play in this console chess game and neither console is benefiting from the situation, but it looks like Sony are more prepared. Again, this correlates with what we seen this gen at E3 when Sony skipped it, baring in mind they had their first parties lined up and were working on PS5, meanwhile xbox were hyping 3rd parties and doing the usual damage control.
Re: PS5 UI Concept Imagined by Animator
@nessisonett
More like xbox's shtick atm, between being obsessed with hardware and old games, their currently library is suffering. Besides, if the new games look anything like halo infinite, that's probably a good thing lmfao.