Comments 14

Re: Baldur's Gate 3 Dev Larian Studios Has No Interest in Being Acquired

Grimmy001

@Kevw2006
That's also because SONY can't. You honestly believe that SONY, freaking SONY would not buy publishers like Activision or Bethesda if it could? And they would absolutely make all those games exclusive on PS and skip PC as well.

The only reason they are now releasing on PC is because of the success of Microsoft selling its games on PC. Why else did it take Sony so much longer to release its games on PC?

Re: Baldur's Gate 3 Dev Larian Studios Has No Interest in Being Acquired

Grimmy001

That's great but what happens when they offer 50 million bucks?
What happens when you leave and whoever takes over decides to sell the studio?

I really hope they remain independent. Publishers are pointless in today's world and cause more negative press than positive.

I like Jedi Survivor because Respawn, not EA. I like Spiderman because Insomniac, not Sony.

Re: Sackboy: A Big Adventure Has Proven Very Unpopular on PC

Grimmy001

I just find it surprising because I am sure it is a fine game but .... no level editor? That's like the whole point of Little Big Planet! I am sure if they bring down the price and release LBP 1, 2 or 3 or better yet, all of them in a package, the sales would be far better.

I want an extensive level editor game like LBP or Dreams on PC. This game is fine but it is not enough.

Re: Abandoned PS5 Saga Sounds Eerily Familiar to Past Blue Box Projects

Grimmy001

I said it before and I will say it again.
If this doesn't turn out to be a Kojima project, then these developers frankly deserve all the hate that will be coming their way. I do not condone death threats but this is the internet and they should know better. And no, they are joining in on this cause of marketing. You wanna use the hype? Better take the heat.

Re: Soapbox: Sony Is Not Anti-Consumer for Making PS5 Exclusives

Grimmy001

@DarthDiggler
You do not know what a straw man argument is do you?
And its really quite simple.

Exclusives are not options. They are in fact the opposite as they force the consumer to opt in a different system just for being allowed to play a game. Ambition doesn't come from just being exclusive. Otherwise all exclusive games would be ambitious simply for being exclusive.

Also what a platform can do these days is very irrelevant. There is no secret tech in these machines. During the PS3 you had the cell and it was so complicated most games didn't utilise its capabilities. That's not the case with these consoles anymore. The reason why these developers make good games is because they are talented at making games and in that sense, for console manufacturers, it is in their best interest to make those games exclusive to sell hardware. I already acknowledged this.

However, that doesn't change the fact that Exclusives are by design anti consumer. They are made to exclude people from your game unless you buy a new machine. That's where the term exclusive comes from in the first place.

And to be clear. I am not saying Sony is anti consumer. Exclusive games on any platform are anti consumer. Why should it matter if I play on a pc or ps4 or switch or Xbox?

Re: Microsoft May Bring First-Party Franchises to PlayStation in the Future

Grimmy001

I dunno, that seems unlikely.
The reasoning of this is beyond stupid though.

You base the assumption entirely on Minecraft? You do know that Minecraft was on PS4, PS3 and PS Vita BEFORE Microsoft bought Minecraft right? What would they do? Make it unavailable to PS Platforms when they got it? That makes no sense. Halo isn't even on PC, let alone soon to be released on PS4.