Comments 61

Re: Sony Seemingly Ends VR Ambitions by Selling Patents to Meta

EbolaGW

Once again, poorly handheld by Sony. Common PlayStation L.

Make a second gen PSVR, but then:
-Not being backwards compatible with PSVR1 games
-No upgrade paths for PSVR2 versions from 1
-No PC compatibility for the longest time and by then, people already moved on
-Less games than PSVR1
-Just like PS5, poor first party support

Sony on a roll of Ls.

Re: Insomniac Sounds Sick and Tired of People Demanding Wolverine PS5 News

EbolaGW

Maybe don't announce a game way too early. πŸ’€

The fact that it might come out after 2027 is a massive joke. By the time it releases, we'll be getting the PS6. 😭

This is also why long development times is bad and Sony's refusal to make AA games in between big releases hurts them. Maybe PS5 would've been worth playing while waiting for the big AAA exclusives.

Re: Poll: What Did You Think of Sony's State of Play for February 2025?

EbolaGW

It was boring. The only interesting things were Split Fiction, and I guess Sonic Racing CrossWorld. (But that's a whole separate topic)

Also, why did they end with a new IP with no gameplay and instead a CG trailer of a generic guy with a gun looking at an enemy? That's not exciting at all and mind as well not include it in the show.

Overall, it was poor. But that's already expected for most State of Play presentations. 5/10

Re: Poll: Would You Buy PS5 Pro If It Was Cheaper?

EbolaGW

The PS5 Pro is really the most useless and unnecessary refresh to ever release in current history.

The base PS5 is still good enough for what it supposed to be doing, playing games. But even that is more questionable now that Sony is making more consoles than games.

The PS5 has yet to be used to its full advantage since all we keep getting are PS4 remasters and remakes.

It's also comedy gold how they're already talking about 8K when there's no viable 8K displays in the market at all. If the base PS5 couldn't even do proper 4K, what makes the Pro being able to do 8K? You really can't make this up.

Not to mention the lack of a disc drive is extremely concerning and clear that Sony is prioritizing digital. Especially since you cannot buy digital games outside of the PS Store where you can get games at a discount. Nintendo and Microsoft allows their digital games to be sold outside of the eShop and Xbox Store respectively. Why can't Sony? Because they want to monopolize the market at much as possible.

Overall, Sony has been very disappointing, anti-consumer, greedy, and arrogant. I truly hate this era of PlayStation.

Re: Talking Point: Have Sony's Third-Party PS5 Deals Made Up for Its Lack of First-Party Games?

EbolaGW

It's just frustrating that Sony is legit holding back many third party developers because of their lack of first party exclusives.

SquareEnix and Atlus are perfect examples. So far many SE Games has been locked to PS4/5 and look where that's heading, a loss of over 200 million dollars.

In contrast with Atlus, now that they're free from PlayStation exclusivity and is bringing their games to many platforms as possible, the results speak for itself.

SquareEnix shouldn't be punished for Sony's lackluster generation.

  • Page :
  • 1