Very well produced and performed take on some of the life of Henry V. I've seen Timothee Chamolet's name around but not seen in anything that I recall. His performance was great, as was Joel Edgerton - whose Yorkshire accent is almost uncanny.
The show is very much stolen by Robert Pattinson though. His sneering Frenchman is absolutely on point. Initially there's something rather comical about his delivery as the Dauphin; I couldn't shake the feeling that I was watching Antoine de Caunes doing his best (vampire) Lestrade - soon enough, the genius of his performance shines through. It very quickly feels like an authentic delivery of English by someone who despises the language and the people who speak it.
Also somewhat of a show-stealer is the photography. I'm not certain as it could just be clever colour grading - but the outdoor scenes all feel as if they were shot with natural light (as was done with The Revenant), and it adds a beautiful realistic feel to scenes.
Anyway, great dialogue expertly delivered, authentic feeling production design and a wonderfully grim depiction (though on the small side and pretty inaccurate) of The Battle of Agincourt. Well worth a watch.
PSN: KALofKRYPTON (so you can see how often I don't play anything!)
Twitter: @KALofKRYPTON (at your own risk, I don't care if you're offended)
"Fate: Protects fools, little children, and ships named Enterprise." - Cmdr William T. Riker
@KALofKRYPTON I actually thought a lot of jokes in the Bad Boys 2 were quite funny. My problem with it was the story but that's usually the case with Michael Bay movies anyways. Another issue with his movies are racial stereotypes.
@JohnnyShoulder 13 year old me thought the first film was great. But it had that Shy Guy song being played everywhere you turned out and about and people at school loving it etc etc.
Not a film I've sought out to revisit, but it was fine at the time.
PSN: KALofKRYPTON (so you can see how often I don't play anything!)
Twitter: @KALofKRYPTON (at your own risk, I don't care if you're offended)
"Fate: Protects fools, little children, and ships named Enterprise." - Cmdr William T. Riker
@WanderingBullet@KALofKRYPTON Maybe it was a sign of the times and those types of movies don't really work anymore. Or maybe it's just me getting older and my tastes changing. I liked some back in the day, Tango & Cash, The Last Boy Scout, Lethal Weapon, 48 Hours to name a few of the top of the head. Something about Bad Boys didn't click with me. I might have seen too many by then lol.
Life is more fun when you help people succeed, instead of wishing them to fail.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
Yesterday, my best friend started yelling "SHAME!!" at me when I admitted that, beyond brief clips of its famous one-liners, I had never seen Predator and so, earlier today, I grabbed a copy whilst in town.
a well-written, well-acted, well-directed, well-paced and just, well, well-made monster movie.
It was actually slated pretty badly upon release @RogerRoger if I recall right... It's only since then it's become known as a classic!
I totally agree too. It's once of the few films that I could happily rewatch on a regular basis.
I think the "cloaking" effect for the Predator actually holds up fairly well for the most part... Glowstick blood not so much though lol
At one point Jean Claude Van Damme of all people was supposed to play the part of the Predator in one of his first roles (apparently he was not happy at all and left)
It looked terrible too before they got extra funding and hired some legendary special effect/make up artist AND they got the 7ft Kevin Peter Hall to don the make up and prosthetics in the now iconic look!
The sequel... Uhh... Danny Glover is ok I guess? It's... passable. But nowhere near as good.
There is no third and fourth either before you say, that's just crazy talk
Just rewatched The Shining in anticipation of Doctor Sleep, which I'll be seeing in a few days. It's... full of iconic imagery, tense direction, and creative cinematography, of course, but the film still feels disjointed to me. Which is probably intentional. Jack and Danny walk around looking like they've been doped up on Prozac through most of the film, and Wendy... I dunno. I think the character was supposed to come off as demure and passive, but, honestly, she just seems stupid in this film. Having little to nothing in the way of an internal life or character arc of her own, she exists to scream and look terrified and hurt as the bug-eyed Jack Torrance becomes increasingly unhinged. The black chef guy was an interesting character at first, but I'm really disappointed with how his arc ends, given the build-up it receives throughout the film. And Danny's 'shining' ability feels fairly inconsequential to the film as a whole, beyond one subplot that terminates too quickly.
All of this contributes to a sense that Kubrick's film is conceptually empty. It's full of great setpieces and images and scary music, but, when you drill down into it, you come away with a story that's not about much of anything in particular. And, due to the weird, disjointed pacing, it feels like the film exists to set up this weirdness and little else. It's no wonder Stephen King hated the film.
As an exercise in style and filmmaking craft, though, it's still very much worth watching.
@RogerRoger Honestly, First Blood is probably nothing like what you're expecting, based on the reputation of the series in popular culture. It's pretty much the furthest thing imaginable from dumb, jingoistic action cinema.
Speaking of, have you seen the film Commando? It's a terrible movie, honestly, but a ton of fun in a "shut your brain off and enjoy the sociopathic Reagan-era machismo" sorta way. It's sort of like a distillation of everything that went into action movies through the 80's, but with the conscience removed, which makes it very honest, in its own special way.
Forums
Topic: The Movie Thread
Posts 2,441 to 2,460 of 8,893
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic