Comments 6

Re: Assassin's Creed Valhalla Won't Be the Longest or Biggest Game in the Series, Says Ubisoft Dev

asapas8

@Gotham ''bigger doesnt mean bettee. What about denser, more immersive, more interactive stuff. Less checklists, more actual exploration, less *****, more quality''

And that's why you fall in the trap too. I didn't tell about JUST BEING BIGGER. I told about being BOTH BIGGER AND DENSER GAME!!! We live in 2020 and technology advances with gigantic leaps each and every day, I bet that they can easily achieve something like this. Shortening the game isn't an excuse for the 'bloating complains' as they mentioned.
Let's hope it is going to be as big as Odyssey and denser. That could make everyone happy I think, and that's the point that each and every game should set as a target, especially in open world games.

Re: Assassin's Creed Valhalla Won't Be the Longest or Biggest Game in the Series, Says Ubisoft Dev

asapas8

I really can't understand the devs here. We live in 2020, games SHOULD be getting bigger and bigger, having many more interesting activities, more detailed interiors of buildings etc. So, instead of making the game shorter, they should focus on making the game BOTH BIGGER, AND GIVE MORE DEPTH TO THIS. Supposedly, we are going towards a more advanced technology these years,(with big leaps as a matter of fact) I just can't understand the decision to simply shorten the game length. In fact, people wanted more depth in Odyssey and Origins, not a shorter game, it's the grinding that upsets gamers, not the game length as a definition