Comments 35

Re: Talk of Final Fantasy 7 Remake Trilogy Being Completely Console Exclusive to PlayStation Is Inaccurate

Player_1_Ready

@MikeOrator Square Enix doesn't need to be hurting in money to do the most outrageous decisions, they do decisions out of spite.

Chances are Square Enix offered the Tomb Raider timed exclusivity to Microsoft to teach Sony a lesson, as the same could be said about Final Fantasy XIV taking so long to be on Xbox even after Phil Spencer said multiple times that they were waiting on Square Enix to make a decision about it... Even more outrageous was the sale of Tomb Raider and other IPs to Embracer for just 300 million when they most probably offered them to Sony and Microsoft first but for far more money and they declined the sum.

Or do you really think Sony or Microsoft would have passed that deal for just 300 million???

I don't think so.

Re: Talk of Final Fantasy 7 Remake Trilogy Being Completely Console Exclusive to PlayStation Is Inaccurate

Player_1_Ready

@MikeOrator Make no mistake, Sony is getting all the good stuff while Microsoft gets the scraps, but the question is for how long can Sony keep feeding the beast with their money before Square Enix looks the other way and sides with Microsoft for a ground shattering deal the way they did with Tomb Raider.

Money talks and Square Enix has no allegiance to anybody than to themselves.

Re: Capcom's PS5 Action Game Kunitsu-Gami: Path of the Goddess Continues to Show Promise

Player_1_Ready

@gymratAmarillo Why would I want to play it on GamePass? because unlike PSPlus, Xbox is giving me the option to enjoy it for a fraction of the price while you might have to pay full price for it.

Capcom is getting payed handsomely by Microsoft for GamePass users, so I'm guessing those buying on other platforms should really be concerned on helping the developer at full price.

The world is full of options...some better than others as you can see.