@johncalmc It's difficult. There's an artistic value to something like the dramatic alteration in tone DDLC enjoys as the true nature of the character relationships and narrative emerge not being spoiled. The surprising nature of that game is arguably what made it such a sensation in the first place. With that said, there's also a humanitarian value in not springing extreme content on people who could become seriously triggered by exposure to it.
I do think explicitly spoiling the in-game content is the wrong approach, though. In terms of a game like this, I'd say it'd probably be better to warn that the game is rated M (or whatever the equivalent of an adult rating is where you live), features "extreme content," and refer players to an external source if they wish to learn more. If someone with sensitivities can't be bothered to do that amount of research, then, IMO, that's on them. I do also like your proposed method of 'opting-in' to content warnings, in the case of something interactive like a video game.
Still need to play it myself. Even being mostly spoiled on it, I'm curious to experience it.
@Ralizah@RogerRoger Maybe I'll contact Jim Ryan and tell him about my plan. I think he's from up here. We'll get on.
Yes, balancing this one is really tough, I think. And while I personally don't need any trigger warnings of any kind, I'm not the sort of person who thinks that people who do are lol snowflakes or being dramatic or anything. You can go out of your way to avoid things that you know you find offensive or upsetting, but if a game springs it on you - especially when it presents itself as something else entirely - then perhaps some kind of warning - however artless that may be - is the best option.
I just don't like it when the trigger warning is thrust upon me. I like going into things totally blind and not knowing anything.
I would defo recommend Doki Doki though. Even if you're not a fan of visual novels (I am) or dating sims (I'm not) I think the game is short enough and inventive enough that anyone can enjoy it or at least appreciate what it does.
@RogerRoger Out of interest, what was the TV show?
@johncalmc It's one of those games I've intended to play for years but... just never seem to get around to. I'm sure everyone probably has games like that. You're not even disinterested in them, but something else always seems to take priority.
I'm going to sit down and just blow through this one of these days.
@Ralizah My list of games that I've intended to play for years but never seem to get round to gives me anxiety. It's huge. I can't tell you how many times I've downloaded Hellblade and then deleted it without playing it. There's others. Steins;Gate 0, Titanfall 2... Doom Eternal! How have I not started Doom Eternal yet? So many games I need to get around to starting.
@RogerRoger@johncalmc Oh gosh, games I have planned to play and just left on the shelf for some inexplicable reason…. I have oodles of those. Notable games like Spider-Man Miles Morales, Final Fantasy 7 Remake, and Life is Strange 2. These are a few of the many backlog games that are near guarantees to be games I adore. It’s almost like I’m afraid to play them and then lose the anticipation of playing them. It’s weird. So I often pull out more experimental games from the backlog; somehow prioritizing games that I’m taking more of a chance on. Perhaps there’s some joy in the excitement of the hunt and discovery of new things. I don’t know.
And yes, John — get on Hellblade ASAP. That games a friggin’ tour de force. And Titanfall 2 ain’t half bad either.
@Th3solution@Ralizah@johncalmc@RogerRoger At last count I had about 90 games I've purchased and not played. That includes PS Plus mind, but I don't claim every game however only the ones that I have an interest in. I'm not near my console at the moment, but one game that sticks out is one of thr earlier Madden games for PS4 which I've not even booted up once.
I've tried to stay away from doing that recently though, and only buying games when I know I will be playing them pretty soon. And certainly all the games I've bought on or near day one I will play immediately. Otherwise I'll wait until I'm ready play them to purchase them.
Life is more fun when you help people succeed, instead of wishing them to fail.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
@JohnnyShoulder I'm terrible for it. I spy a sale and have a look and then pick up four or five things that look interesting that I probably would never have bought if they weren't on sale and then I never play them. I have an astonishing backlog. Actually absurd. One day I might write them all out into some sort of spreadsheet or something. I probably won't.
I'm actually on the store now going through the sale. Got Outer Wilds and Pyre in my basket. Why? I don't know. Loads of pages left to go.
@johncalmc When I do that I just browse through my library of games and see if there is anything in my library that is similar or just fancy playing. Half the the time a game sparks an interest that I already have which I've long forgotten about.
Life is more fun when you help people succeed, instead of wishing them to fail.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
@johncalmc When I do that I just browse through my library of games and see if there is anything in my library that is similar or just fancy playing. Half the the time a game sparks an interest that I already have which I've long forgotten about.
I'm still going through the store deals now and I just saw a game which apparently I have purchased and I didn't even know what it was. It's insane. I've got some games where I can't remember if I actually own them or not. I always get confused about which one of The Messenger or Dead Cells I have. I've got one of them but never started it.
On the forgotten games topic, I’ve mentioned before that I’d like to have the ability to customize the digital game library - both on the console and on the app. The app is especially lacking in that department, having no filtering options at all and only will display owned games in alphabetical order, starting with numbers. So I have to stare at 10 second Ninja X, 2064 Read Only Memories, and 99 Vidas every time I pull up my library. It would be nice to be able to move around the games and order them how you like, so that the ones you want to prioritize are front-and-center and less likely to be lost and forgotten in the sea of other clutter.
The workaround is doing the spreadsheet thing of course, but it would be nice for the UI to have that functionality. I guess folders is the way PS4 did it, but even that limits things to just what you’ve downloaded. We all have digital libraries in the hundreds (if not thousands) now and so we need to be able to organize it better.
@Th3solution The filters on the console seem do a decent job of helping to sort the games in the library, for me anyway. I only have a library of mainly PS4 and PS5 games, with a couple of PS3 titles when I've dabbled with them on PS NOW, so what is there now is good enough. You can also hide games now, which may also help with what you are after.
Life is more fun when you help people succeed, instead of wishing them to fail.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
@JohnnyShoulder If I include every Steam and subscription (PS+) game I haven't played, my backlog is... staggering.
I don't even bother keeping track of it anymore. I know what I own. And if I continually play more games than I buy, the backlog issue will work itself out over time.
Currently Playing: Resident Evil Village: Gold Edition
@RogerRoger Shame to hear Shinobi Striker ended up being thin on content and mediocre. Especially considering the combat and presentation are excellent. The worst sorts of mediocre-to-bad games are the ones that are just good enough in some respects to make you wonder what could have been if the developers had made different choices.
Unfortunately, a lack of an engaging gameplay loop will kill a multiplayer/service game, and it sounds like the content in this doesn't remain especially compelling once it starts aggressively recycling itself.
It's been a long while since I last posted in this thread (I have been lazy and have about 3 PS4 & Switch games apiece I need to do writeups on, so it just sort of became too daunting for me to tackle, lol), but I've been introduced to a new side of the gaming landscape (as you'll soon see) and have decided to use it as a jumping off point for a bit of a fresh start here.
Dogfight 1942 (PC/Steam)
Gameplay:
Mission based arcade dogfighter that's pretty simple to grasp (especially if you've played anything similar, the controls feel almost exactly the same as those in Sky Gamblers: Storm Raiders, which I played on Switch).
Missions usually consist of two or three objectives separated by checkpoints, and range from typical "shoot everything down" stuff (sometimes with a defensive objective, as you can see below where you have to destroy all bombers before London's life bar is depleted), to ship bombing runs, landing challenges, and even a stealth segment.
Sometimes a mission will let you choose between a few different planes (usually 2 or 3, though I think the final mission gives you like 6 or so options), though just as often you're required to use a specific plane (like one where you're in a sea plane). Special weapons seem to be pre-determined as well (everything has a machine gun, but mission objective determines whether it's joined by bombs, torpedos, or rockets).
Played it on Normal and found it to be an extremely easy & short experience (not a complaint mind you, just a head's up). Your plane actually has auto regen (just fly away from the action for a few secs & you're good to go), and even if you do fail the missions tend to be short enough that it'll take you no time at all to get back to where you were (especially considering the aforementioned checkpoints). All in all you can knock this one out in a couple of hours.
It has a more arcadey focus though, so if you really get into it there's replayability in the form of it's grading system (you earn 1-5 stars upon mission completion depending on score, which you can improve upon by completing optional objectives, taking out non objective required enemies, and chaining together kill streaks) & multiple difficulty settings. There's also online co-op, dogfight, and survival modes which I haven't tried.
There are also two extra DLC campaigns (Russian & I think African campaigns) which I intended to buy in a bundle (base game is $10, and the bundle with everything is only $12, so it's definitely the way to go if you buy it), but I got a little ahead of myself and just got the base game. I'm sure I'll buy the expansions eventually though, as they're just $3 a pop individually.
Story:
There's really no overall narrative, you just jump from famous battle to famous battle, either as the US fighting Japan in the Pacific or the UK fighting Germany in western Europe. Unlike other games of the type each side isn't even separated into it's own campaign, you'll just play two missions as the US, two as the UK, so on so forth until it ends. The Battle of Britain, Iwo Jima, Midway, and Okinawa are just some of the battles you'll take part in.
Audio/Visual:
Originating as a 360 game it's not the most advanced looking game, but it still looks relatively modern & clean. I was able to run it in 1080p at max settings, & while the bombing raid over London was the "troublesome" mission dropping to just above 80 fps at times, pretty much every other mission was showing to run with framerates in the multi-hundreds (over 4-500 frames at times, not that I would even be able to perceive that), so I'm sure any relatively modern PC could run it without issue.
I should also mention that the game is glitched in that it doesn't render trees (they're there, but you can't see them). This isn't a problem 98% of the time, but there is exactly one objective where you have to land next to a plane crashed in a field where you'll be crashing or bouncing off of the things since you don't know where they are. This can apparently be fixed by changing the PC's internal clock to before the year 2012 (the year of the game's release), but I never bothered and still completed the objective after only like 3 tries.
It's soundtrack consists of generic war music. Hardly anything memorable, but it gets the job done.
I should also mention that being a WWII game, you're going to hear a certain Japanese racial slur repeated about 5,000 times. Understandable given the context, but it'll probably make some uncomfortable nonetheless in this day & age.
Conclusion:
I was actually looking to see if Blazing Angels was available (I played it back on the Wii but never finished it at the time), but apparently Ubisoft pulled it & it's sequel from Steam back in 2015 (likely due to expiring plane licences?) so I looked for something similar & found this, and it did the job. Nothing revolutionary, but a nice time for those who like arcade dogfighters. A nice easy transition into PC gaming for me.
Currently Playing:
Switch - Blade Strangers
PS4 - Kingdom Hearts III, Tetris Effect (VR)
@RR529 Nice review. So this is your first PC/Steam game?
Sometimes the simple, arcade-like experiences are exactly what are needed to clean the palette after getting bogged down in difficult RPGs or narrative-heavy games. I assume this is similar to something like Ace Combat? Never played a game like this (unless you count Jungle/Desert Strike on the Genesis, lol), but they've always looked like fun.
Sorry to hear about the performance issues. 80fps is pretty much slideshow territory, innit?
What other PC games are you looking at playing?
Currently Playing: Resident Evil Village: Gold Edition
Forums
Topic: User Impressions/Reviews Thread
Posts 1,301 to 1,320 of 2,213
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic