The crowd, accepting this immediately, assumed the anti-Eurasian posters and banners everywhere were the result of acts of sabotage by agents of Goldstein and ripped them from the walls.
@BearsEatBeets
NXG > Alex
It's just a work in progress..
The crowd, accepting this immediately, assumed the anti-Eurasian posters and banners everywhere were the result of acts of sabotage by agents of Goldstein and ripped them from the walls.
The crowd, accepting this immediately, assumed the anti-Eurasian posters and banners everywhere were the result of acts of sabotage by agents of Goldstein and ripped them from the walls.
@Arugula
No. It was shown in the renders though.
Another thing is the panels seem removable. You can see it in the picture showing the top down
So that leak was real.
The crowd, accepting this immediately, assumed the anti-Eurasian posters and banners everywhere were the result of acts of sabotage by agents of Goldstein and ripped them from the walls.
The crowd, accepting this immediately, assumed the anti-Eurasian posters and banners everywhere were the result of acts of sabotage by agents of Goldstein and ripped them from the walls.
The crowd, accepting this immediately, assumed the anti-Eurasian posters and banners everywhere were the result of acts of sabotage by agents of Goldstein and ripped them from the walls.
@JJ2 I don't really see the issue with having an Internet connection to play a game in this day and age. Suppose if your connection is not reliable it's gonna be a bummer. Someone commented on the Godfall article that they HAVE to pay 70 quid for the game and 50 quid for PS Plus to play the game...🤦♂️
@JohnnyShoulder Because it's unnecessary. The game will be reliant on their servers in order to work. If they pull those servers 5 years from now, the game becomes unplayable. Look, this is inevitable for online-only games like Destiny. But why lock a single player game behind an internet connection? There's no reason for it. Same with Godfall, you can play it solo, so there's no reason for the internet connection. This isn't the first time Gearbox pulled a game's servers either. Remember Battleborn? Yeah, you can't even play it anymore, and that game is barely four years old.
@Octane Some good points but I'm not sure how you can deem it unnecessary unless you have you played the game? There could be some online element which is key to how the game plays and they couldn't get it work right without an online connection. But no, it must because the publisher is EVIL lol. Just because a publisher stopped supporting a game that was DOA does not mean they will do it again. Maybe they saw some of the feedback and won't do it again. We don't know for sure as it hasn't happened yet. But always there is no balance to these stories and the reaction with only the negatives being highlighted.
Life is more fun when you help people succeed, instead of wishing them to fail.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
@JohnnyShoulder
Yes your not wrong.
I suppose they may be able to do things on a server that arent possible locally. However that also means the game may not be supported anymore in a few years time and the copy you keep will be useless at some point.
I still cant wait to play Outriders but disappointed too because I'm only into the single player experience.
The crowd, accepting this immediately, assumed the anti-Eurasian posters and banners everywhere were the result of acts of sabotage by agents of Goldstein and ripped them from the walls.
@JohnnyShoulder In that case they should come out and say what's so special about it, because I haven't it yet (using these two games as examples). Even Death Stranding, a game that heavily relied on asynchronous multiplayer could be played offline, solo, without the need of an internet connection.
I just don't see the positive side of a single player game requiring a constant internet connection. There is none.
Forums
Topic: PlayStation 5 --OT--
Posts 1,421 to 1,440 of 4,578
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic