Forums

Topic: PlayStation 5 --OT--

Posts 4,561 to 4,568 of 4,568

MaulTsir

@Th3solution Oh yes, I can totally understand your reluctance to start another 100+ hour journey so soon, it is always a big time commitment and your right the frame of mind has to be right, otherwise I don't think we sometimes give these games the fair crack they deserve.

Taking small breaks is definitely the right thing to do and it's something that has helped me massively. This last year I've got so much better at managing my self gaming, the dread backlog anxiety and the speed new games came out was absolutely pulling down for far too long. Like you mentioned about thinking about what to play next before even finishing a game, I was like that constantly, even trying to work out the hours and list what I could get through before starting a game. But I've took a step back and a new approach now which has really helped me this year and I feel like nearly every game I've played since I've just enjoyed it so much more than I would have previously. I'm a relaxed gamer now rather than a stressed one šŸ˜‚.

Big congrats on finishing BG3 that's no mean feet! What are you're overall feelings on the game?
I admittedly got to Act 2 and gave up. I think it was the dread of making the wrong choice all the time that stopped me and then I put it down and never picked it back up again. But I will be hoping to get back to it one day. I'll probably start again in all honesty because I couldn't even remember where I was up to, I just remember I made alot of terrible choices and felt like I was going to be missing alot of stuff because of it lol.

You have a lot of good games to choose from by the looks of it, I have never played the silent hill games, was always a Resident Evil guy but I do really want to play Silent Hill 2 its looks so good. The Resident Evils are always good pallet cleaners because RE2 and 3 Remakes you can get through a single playthrough in 8 to 10 hours and feel like you've accomplished something.

I enjoyed Forbidden West, not as much as Horizon Zero Dawn but it's still a really good game to play. 50+ hours easily though and knowing your like me you could easily stretch that to 70 with exploring and getting lost in the world šŸ˜‚

Ragnarok is another game that's a 40 to 50 hour journey, I was at 70 but 20 hours where for plat clean up.

If your looking for a fast paced action-y type game then I couldn't recommend Stellar Blade enough, it's not as highly narrative as GOW or Horizon but it's combat, style and world is fantastic. A playthrough is about 30 hours so really that sweet spot of not to long but not to short, I was at 50 but I did all ending and enjoyed the combat that much I played the combat simulator to redo boss battles.

MaulTsir

Th3solution

ā€œWe cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.ā€

Herculean

The new Horizon game is so weird. I get the co-op and live service and all that, but I don't get...

  • It looks like the game is now losing its most distinguishing feature gameplay wise, and that is shooting parts off of robots
  • It's not clear to me why they do not reuse the assets from Horizon 2. That game looks amazing. Nightreign just reused its assets, even though having a completely different energy from Elden Ring. Everybody loved that.
  • I don't really understand the trailer. They present Varl and Erend as if people care about them, but I don't know they do.

What I'm basically saying is, I have a hard time seeing why Horizon fans should be excited about this. Could still be a great game, but as a Horizon spin-off it makes limited sense.

Herculean

CaptD

@Herculean
It doesn’t interest me but then nor does Fortnite so perhaps it isn’t aimed at me despite me enjoying the recent Horizon games although I do think it is time to give the franchise a rest.
Anyway just reading the comments on the video on PlayStation YouTube channel and the top comment is ā€œHorizon : Zero Interestā€ which I thought was very witty.

I do wonder if this game will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back with the camel being Hermen Hulst, but again the game isn’t aimed at me so time will tell whether it is a success.

EDIT Quick edit before people say ā€œbut but it wasn’t greenlit by Hermenā€, possibly but I don’t think that changes much.

[Edited by CaptD]

CaptD

Herculean

@CaptD I don't know if they need to give the franchise a rest, but their output after Horizon Zero Dawn just never felt inspiring to me. Instead of sticking to AltaĆÆr, Ubisoft switched to Ezio for Assassin's Creed II. Not saying they need to invent a more charismatic Aloy, but you need to constantly think about moving a franchise forward to prevent it from going stale.

Herculean

Werehog

Herculean wrote:

They present Varl and Erend as if people care about them, but I don't know they do.

...wait, Varl was in the trailer? Where?! I immediately recognised that Erend has a new voice actor, that's not John Hopkins (or if it is, he's going in a whole new direction) but didn't spot Varl anywhere.

"If I let not knowing anything stop me from doing something, I'd never do everything!"

Herculean

@Werehog No sign of him. I must have imagined him! Anyway, good to know there are Varl and Erend stans like you out there!

Herculean

Herculean

@Werehog Also, the voice acting bit is interesting. Like: why didn't Aloy have a voice? Why did they change Erend's voice actor? You don't have to use those characters for a game like this, and without their voice actors, what's the point of including them? And moreso: why didn't these actors lend their voices for this game?

We need a journalist on this!

Herculean

Please login or sign up to reply to this topic