(PlayStation Network - Vita)

Pure Chess (PlayStation Network - Vita)

Game Review

Pure Chess Review

Europe PAL Version

Posted by Mike Mason

Pawn shop

With an extensive range of tutorials tucked beneath its board, Pure Chess is set to make a grandmaster out of the freshest chess newbie. There are unforced errors in its approach, however, that prevent it from matching up to the age-old game's traditional quality.

Pure Chess is the work of VooFoo Studios, the team behind Hustle Kings, and it shows in the pristine presentation. The board and environments shine enticingly where appropriate, while the pieces are textured to convincingly resemble stone or wood. Your background – library, penthouse or museum — and theme are selectable between games and are applied across each mode.

Beneath that fancy veneer lies a suitably cunning AI that will prove more than a match for most players when approaching all but the lowest difficulty settings. As you use the touch screen – or, more awkwardly, the analogue stick and buttons – to bat down the enemy's safeguards and bid to pin down their king, the CPU has more than enough talent to break down your defences and counter your tactics.

Yet it shares much of this knowledge with you upon request. A large number of tutorials, spanning the basics of each piece and through more complex manoeuvres right up to the end game, are accessible from the main menu. They're not compulsory, but unless you're a regular, proficient player of chess you'll likely learn a small trick or two, and they do a good job of explaining all the checks and mates.

You can test your new skills in single player exhibition matches, where you can set parameters such as time allowed for moves or how badly you want the CPU to thrash you. Match replay data can be saved, though unfortunately there's no option to quick save mid-match to resume later. For those looking for more than a quick go, tournaments of four consecutive games are also available. A challenge mode features dozens of puzzles to test your finishing skills by attaining checkmate in one to five moves; good luck with that.

Sorely missing, however, is standard multiplayer. There's no local 'pass the system about' hot-seating, nor ad-hoc, nor straightforward online. Instead there's message play, in which you and a friend can send moves to each other via PlayStation Network, with up to eight games running simultaneously. It's a nice idea that lends itself to chess perfectly, but in execution it's slow and clunky, with PSN partially to blame for its general access speed.

It takes too long to click into a message, tap the contained link, wait for the game to load up and get the match on screen before you can make your play. Consider the number of moves in an average game of chess, plus the potential tedium of a repetitious roundabout dance at the conclusion. Now add a minute or two before each move can even be considered, on top of breaks of play due to the play style, and the play by mail function fails to garner as much lustre as the play-pieces. What Pure Chess really needs is online multiplayer that can be played live, against friends and similarly-skilled strangers alike.

The general controls are also more serviceable than exceptional. The touch control works fast when it isn't being finicky, but there are definite instances where it's more arduous to select a move than it should be, particularly for pieces in the row furthest away. Ideally every tap would be perfect, but in reality there are frequent failures of recognition that mean you might have to press a piece two or three times before it's selected.

In addition the camera, also swung about with the touch screen, drags and doesn't glide where you want it to easily – it's better to cut out the zoom-ins and leave it resting in the standard view. You won't get to see the pretty pieces close up as often, but you get a far more playable game. Alternately, you could swivel around with the right analogue stick instead.

Conclusion

Pure Chess's basic game and artificial intelligence are appropriate for beginners and experts alike, with many tutorials and challenges to keep single players busy. However, the lack of multiplayer outside of the crawling message play hurts a game that is, by its very nature, a two player game, and it isn't aided by flow-breaking input problems.

Sponsored links by Taboola

More Stories

User Comments (11)

Slaysme

#1

Slaysme said:

Asynchronous multi as a bad thing in a chess game? You never played chess before the internet was big, did you?

Chess sucks when "live" asynchronous is a better option, although local pass and play should be included.

James

#2

James said:

@Slaysme I think the gist is "good idea, bad execution" — when it takes a minute or two to open every move you can tell how that would really slow the game down. I know it's one of those first world problems, but if the execution were better it'd be more enjoyable :)

Slaysme

#3

Slaysme said:

I don't have the game yet, (US) so maybe the implementation is "off".ill pick it up either way, if we ever get it.

Arturo

#4

Arturo said:

"…there's no option to quick save mid-match to resume later."

There is. Just press Start and choose Save and quit… ¬¬

Mason

#5

Mason said:

@Arturo Not in an exhibition match there isn't. On the pause menu you get the options to resume the match, offer a draw, resign, save the replay data or adjust the audio volume and music choices. You can save in tournaments, but you can't quick-save in the middle of a single match.

@Slaysme James is right; it's the execution. As I say: "It's a nice idea that lends itself to chess perfectly" — and it should work, because that of course was a common method of playing chess, via letter. As a digital version of that idea, though, designed to be played in bite-sized little goes quickly, it's clunky and takes longer than it should to register moves due to the combination of the game boot-up time and PSN logging in adding a couple of minutes to each turn.

Thanks for reading. :)

Savino

#6

Savino said:

Reviews, new and alikes are so much better done in nintendo life than here... I don´t get why since PS has more hardcore followers.

Rey

#8

Rey said:

I don't know why reviewers keep saying there was no local multiplayer option. There is. Just change your opponent in an exhibition match to human.
It's sad that the game gets bad reviews because of this misconception.

amacmac

#9

amacmac said:

It's worth repeating this review is wrong. There IS local pass and play multiplayer in the game. The review should be amended to reflect this mistake.

Squiggle55

#10

Squiggle55 said:

I haven't even played a match yet and this game is worth it at $7.99 for the "problems". Solving how to achieve check mate in 2 moves is hard enough for me let alone 5 moves. This is a very good training tool.

KALofKRYPTON

#11

KALofKRYPTON said:

@Squiggle55
Well that's the first move posted in our 'Play By Mail' game. If any of you watch Red Dwarf, I'm getting the feeling this may get me erased!

Leave A Comment

Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...