
Those of you who prefer to purchase physical games may have another factor to consider moving forward: their impact on the planet.
A fascinating report by French carbon accounting firm Greenly, as published by GamesIndustry.biz, delves into the environmental cost of buying Blu-rays as opposed to digital downloads.
The study claims that the manufacture and transportation of retail releases can be up to “100 times more carbon intensive” than simply purchasing from the PS Store.
According to its research, pressing and shipping up to one million PS5 discs emits up to 312 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e).
Subscribe to Push Square on YouTube166k
By comparison, a 70GB download of one million games emits about three tCO2e.
Author Stefanie Safdie told GamesIndustry.biz:
“Ultimately, downloading a digital copy imposes emissions linked to electricity use at home, as well as the energy use of the concerned data centre – but it does not have the same impact as the emissions created by the industry in terms of landfill and excessive waste, which are primarily still accounted for by physical consoles and hard disk copies of games.”
The report adds that the extraction of rare Earth metals and plastics during the production of physical games also “requires high energy usage and can deplete already finite water resources”.
Cloud-based gaming, as you’d expect, also comes at a cost, as any reduction to the use of physical materials is offset by the power requirements of the servers hosting the content.
The study says that platform holders can help contribute to a greener future by shipping consoles with energy saving features, much like the one Sony recently added to the PS5 which can reduce power consumption by as much as 50%.
When it comes to physical games, the study also argues in favour of a more robust second-hand shopping environment, which encourages the recycling and reuse of existing physical products.
But how do you feel about all this? Have you ever considered the environmental impact of purchasing physical games compared to digital downloads? And has this study forced you to reconsider your purchasing habits moving forwards? Let us know below.
[source gamesindustry.biz]





Comments 93
Guilt trip much....
I'm the problem.
Nice try, but I'll have actual ownership of my games.
Uh doooooooy
Oh no! Anyway… sorry, planet.
Until we have ownership like what GOG do, then I will continue to purchase physically if I like the game.
It’s a fair cop. The question is how much that ethical quandary weighs against the fact you can resell and probably only pay £10 total if you sell within 6 weeks.
I assume this doesn’t take into account the second hand ownership though which would reduce carbon on a per capita basis.
I do not care about this, because the physical gaming market is polluting so little compared to other industries that it is not even close.
This guilt trip is not going to work
Also does this study considers the production of one game is up to a certain point and then it stops printing, while the digital game needs to be hosted/being on a server for way longer time.
Yea sure. Such a weak sauce argument. Software as a service for everything means that more data centers need to be built. In case many aren’t aware, there are many data centers being built across the world and many more will be built. As programs grow in size so do hardware requirements. Which means more earth being used for these centers, more resources plus more energy. And nearly all semiconductors are still made in China or Taiwan then put on dirty ships. I will keep buying physical media for as long as it’s offered i don’t care about price. Don’t let these corporations force consumers into a corner for their convenience in which we own nothing.
I'm ready to talk about the wisdom of adopting full digital purchases when the industry is willing to talk about improving consumer rights for digital purchasers. Regardless of what the fine print technically says, you own something when you buy digital, and you're only purchasing a theoretically time-limited license to use something when you 'buy' digital products. It's an important distinction.
For something like video games, I'll just go digital anyway since true physical isn't really a thing anymore for my preferred platforms (PC/Switch 2), but for books, movies, music, etc.? I'm going to need a lot of convincing to pay for digital licenses instead of just buying them on physical media.
Digital copies are 100 times worse for my bank account.
Oh no whatever will I do?
Ah, right. Continue buying physical so I own my games instead of an indefinite rental. Same with my movies.
Everything has its pros and cons. I’m content with the balance of my decision to purchase games physically.
Oof, yeah - this is sobering. I assumed that physical had a higher impact, but wasn't sure just how disparate the impact of physical game production vs. digital game production was. This will certainly be a part of my calculus moving forward (as a roughly 75/25 physical to digital game buyer right now). Hope we get more data in the future.
Meanwhile CEO's, Taylor Swift etc with frequent private jet usage lmao.
@TechaNinja You know, I was going to mention that but bit my tongue, but glad someone brought it up.
So is cat litter but the alternative is to have them mess all over your home. Even pineapples and avocados are bad for the planet, people still eat them.
This doesn't even take into account all of the extra wallets that need to be produced for physical gamers to put all of their savings
@TechaNinja Exactly! When crap like this stops THEN we can talk how "harmful" physical games are to the environment ...
Make digital games cheaper then
that’s insane i think from now on i’ll move to digital also
never expected it would have this bad of an effect on the environment
i had always thought that the discs being plastic and the blu rays needing its own resources being bad for the environment but not on this huge scale
this opened my eyes completely to move to digital so yeah i’m happy i read this article
Yeah maybe reduce the thenprice of digital by about 20% and i might consider it, for now ill take my cheaper and permanent physical copy thanks and bye
100x worse? Going to need to see the math on that one b/c by my calculations it's only 75x-80x worse. 🙄
Sounds like we need to go back to cassette tapes...
Perhaps if Sony reduced the Store prices inline with Amazon's disc prices on a weekly basis, we might download more.
When digital prices fall in line with physical prices then I'll consider doing my bit for the planet..I might purchase the physical edition of EA wrc so that I feel as though I'm actually producing enough pollution from the 300 and something hours the game tells me I've driven..
Unless your digital download comes in the form of a physical Microsoft game. So im doing my part and dont buy those discs.
As soon as I realized it, I stopped buying ps5 games. I only have Ratchet & Clank that came with the ps5 bundle. I also haven't bought a physical special edition. They take up a lot of space and I hardly do anything with them. I still regret buying the special edition of Killzone 2.
You might want to focus on other countries where they dump there rubbish in the river or on the floor outside where they live. And have miles of rubbish that can be seen from spare,. This seems more of a strategy to get people to buy digital games.
Lmao. This is sounds like Barret preaching about Shinra harvesting Mako energy will kill the planet and Cloud just like "meh" 🤷♂️😂
Sorry to say but buying digital games will not save this earth either.
Heck. Three digital games was removed from my download list:
And i can't redownload some digital comics that i bought from PSP store because the store already closed down.
So nah, i'll buy physical games as long as i can.
If they really want to address this situation, then surely one way to go is to make digital downloads cheaper. Currently, at best both physical and digital cost the same when a game is first released, but more often, physical can be found more cheaply than digital, which makes zero sense, when you factor in all the other expenses involved with having the physical version of the game. So, either make digital more enticing, or make physical less attractive...
"The study also argues in favor of a more robust second-hand shopping environment, which encourages the recycling and reuse of existing physical products."
The problem with that though is the fact some games don't even get physical releases at all anymore. And with the rise of digital growing, the used game market probably won't even exist anymore in a few years unfortunately.
This is such a strange subject to study regarding use of environmental resources. I wonder what was the motivation and bias behind launching this investigation. You could extend this logic to almost any human endeavor and conclude that we should just go back to living in caves and hunt and gather our food..
I got me a thinking I fully intend to hand off my physical collection when I pass away, but how many generations hence will a descendant decide to put it in the landfill.
Sure, my PS5 disc is the problem meanwhile, millionaires and billionaires are using their private jets emitting more carbon dioxide to the planet in one trip than I will in a lifetime
Hmm... Press X to doubt. Previous studies have shown digital is better for the environment in most circumstances, but no where near to the same extent. 100x? Frankly I won't believe it without looking at their whole methodology and seeing how they came to that figure.
Being a "carbon accounting firm" they have implicit bias and it's easy to skew statistics to look in your favour... and grab headlines.
Another factor is where is Digital going? Cloud. So if we are REALLY looking forward, which environmental legislation demands, the more pertinent question should be 'Is Cloud better for the environment than Physical, or even Digital downloads'?
Again other studies have looked into this and it depends on how large the game is, and how long you play. E.g.
Yeah, physical media lovers are the ones causing irreversible damage to our planet. Ok. 🙄
I'm a physical buyer and I'll continue to do that ,love physical games
Wait until everyone realizes that physical discs are just licenses to access a game as well. We don’t own the IP or source code, just a way to access them.
Fascinating! Now why aren’t cost saving passed on to the consumer instead of taken by Sony? Quite frankly screw the planet!
Pretty obvious that in 2025 we shouldn’t be shipping pieces of plastic across the globe unnecessarily.
The fact that we have reasons for preferring the plastic is not an excuse to keep doing it.
That’s the entire point with climate change initiatives. Often the harmful activity we are engaged in, is something that we like and is lower cost than the alternative.
Being green isn’t easy or cheap, no one said it was - if politicians told you otherwise then I’m afraid they are liars (what’s new).
Sacrifices have to be made, whether that is paying a bit more for a digital game copy, driving a smaller car, taking fewer car journeys or not flying abroad on holiday.
Can’t criticise the Trump‘s of this world when you won’t even make the most basic and frivolous of sacrifices.
Okay, as compensation for my horrible love for physical media, I will only use Power Saver mode on PS5, starting today.
Study yeah. Ok. From companys right?! For better, more lucrative of course.
So for digital it only counts the electricity cost of the installation of a once and done game towards the emission but for physical is considers everything from the extraction and refinery of oil to the hypothetical situation that people throw their games in the trash once they’re done with it making it landfill fodder
The other day I was reading an article about the planet's resources:
"In 2018, it would take 1.7 Earths to replenish the natural resources we will collectively use up as a planet"
I bet it has been increasing exponentially since then.
It can't be a proper solution simply by making everything digital. Nor just ordinary people make sacrifices for the future. It needs to be done by everybody's effort.
Are they considering all the servers and databases and what they need to keep them running? Not that I care I'm 100% digital since PS3 -.-'
Was the research sponsored by Sony? 😉
Suggesting that all of the onus is on the consumer when physical is cheaper amidst rising living costs is not the one.
It behoves us all to consider our impact on the planet but ultimately we're forced to pick our battles in today's world.
We can talk about how 'this is x times more damaging than that' but the reality is that it's the richest people who have the biggest negative impact and it's not even close. For this reason it's a load of BS that ordinary folk are made to feel guilty because they forgot to bring their bag for life to Tesco or w/e.
I think if it's a great game that people love having in their collection it's not too bad.
But I can definitely see annual sports titles like FIFA being a waste of plastic as once the new one comes out they just just get either thrown away or sent to charity shops.
How long are they basing the download time on for these stats?
And water is wet!
I couldn't care less about this study. I'll keep buying physical media whenever i can
U physical media holders are going to kill the planet then u won't have nothing
Though physical is 100 times better for reselling.
Erm physical over digital.
You can’t lend a game to a friend or family member digitally, you don’t lose your game when something gets taken off the store physically.
Microsoft don’t seem to be doing proper physical versions of games though for some reason with just doing a code but that’s it.
Most cases physical versions also cost less than digital versions.
As long as something isn’t done by LRG physically as well there’s nothing to worry about when it’s a proper retail version being done
Its a worthy debate, but there are pros and cons to both sides of the argument. I need to read the article to see how its framed, but a quick search only references water extraction in the context of plastic production, but not the vast amounts needed to cool data centres which is putting huge stress on already finite resources. You have to look at the whole environmental cycle and not only carbon emissions in isolation (albeit these are very important).
My gutfeeling is that this is orchestrated to justify the removal of physical media.
I guess the math would look different if we account for the reselling and reuse of physical media - and if accounting for initiatives like cloud streaming the math would move even more to the scale of physical medias.
Lastly, if big business were interested they could have innovated the process of interactive media, but I think the callousness of capitalism is to blame for the glaring omission.
The thing is Digital costs less in labour, manufacturing, shipping, and less omissions yet why does it cost more to us consumers than buying physical?
I'm sure physical would have been dead by last gen if digital games cost £15-£20 less than physical.
How much kickback money did they receive from getting those results?
would be funny if sony, nintendo and microsoft teamed up to fund this pseudo "study".
Obviously not great, but it's not that big in the grand scheme of things environment related. Also I doubt these publishers care about the environment with the push towards AI.
Yeah I don't drive, travel internationally, or have kids - the the three things that leave by far the biggest carbon footprint.
I'm not particularly worried about my physical media collection.
Was this study done by microsoft 😂
Nearly everything is bad for the planet.
I wish they would start focusing on the bigger culprits, and suggest sensible, practical, achievable solutions.
All this approach does is just make people more likely to ignore every similar message.
I call BS. They praised Microsoft's game reselling strategy even though thats the exact thing that PlayStation has a significantly better execution on. The people who made this "study" might not really know what they are talking about. I'm sure the only reason they critique Sony's physical games is because they are actually selling unlike the Xbox equivalent.
Just another way of trying to eradicate physical games. Maybe some truth in it, but I'll keep buying physical thanks.
I heard this argument over CD's vs streaming and it didn't sway me then so sure as rain is wet won't sway me now. The thing is, if I buy a physical copy I can lend it to a friend, or even sell it when I'm done. Most likely it will always be to hand fro whenever I want to play it. I'm of an age where most of my friends have kids who want to play all the latest games, so rather than them shell out for a digital copy that gets quickly forgot they borrow mine for a few evenings to see if it's worth forking out for.
Plus I've sent precisely zero games to landfill. Even my rot riddled copy of THPS (or Tony Hawks Skateboarding as it originally was in the UK) has been repurposed. Well, framed and hung on the wall. 👍🏻
Well that's, that's....too bad.
Glad that there are people out there only buying digital!
@Vaako007 (#10) thank you! Let's see the peer reviewed and reproducable results!
@MrPeanutbutterz (#65) Same.
@PerpetualBoredom Yep. Also @ your 73, hello fellow scientific background enjoyer.
@MrPeanutbutterz my man!
People need to stop seeing the environment as a zero sum game, there are tradeoffs and degrees of harm that need to be taken into account.
They shouldn't over charge for digital games then, then I might consider going digital...
I'll just blow up some more Mako reactors. Nice try Push Square. Also discs are one single product on the planet I don't think stopping their production is going to make a substantial enough impact to matter. When vehicles being produced constantly and junkyarded in the future is far worse.
Don't put the environmental woes of the planet on my menial purchases. Maybe if these big corpos could be more environmentally friendly.
Too bad
Me owning a disc of Ghost Of Yotei isn't doing ***** to the planet compared to all of these billionaires with their private jets and yachts.
Good grief. Try starting with China and India. So tired of this propaganda. Environmental concern is just the cover for actual intentions, which is the almighty dollar. Just makes me want to go buy more physical games.
Haha, brilliant reaction comments.
Physical forever.
Seriously, these studies are wasted time, money and energy.
Did they count energy for endless hours of downloading, because SSD cannot store more games, so you have to redownload again and again and again?
And I claim that digital downloads are 100 times worse for customer ownership and rights.
@ButterySmooth30FPS This, actually. There's functionally not really a difference between buying a disc with all launch content physically on it and buying digitally and storing that data on a hard drive. There's a reason people can still play P.T., regardless of Konami's f***ery. And that buyers are locked out of playing street date breaking discs should tell you everything about your actual ownership therein.
I honestly feel like a lot of physical diehards don't actually understand how digital "ownership" works. What we should be pressing companies on is allowing buyers to back up their purchases outside of their ecosystems. Regardless of if I buy a disc or digital, I should be able to transfer that data to a PC and back it up on as many storage devices as I want with whatever formats I desire.
EDIT: Ideally, we would also be able to burn that data to a disc. But at a certain point, it's hard to ignore pirates and how they'd easily profit off these freedoms.
I have gone full on digital now - I don't fancy leaving all that plastic behind for someone else to throw away.
A BS study that no one with a brain would believe !
I doubt that people buying games digitally instead of physically would be a game changer concerning climate change.
@Dogbreath Best post on here. Thanks.
Funny how these net zero types (let alone the goblin) don't target China or India when it comes to the environment. Till they do nothing will change at all certainly not opting for cheaper physical games as opposed to digital. And besides that it's been proven (in the UK at least) net zero is merely a term used to bleed even more money out of the taxpayer by Labour.
@TechaNinja Let alone all the monarchy types and all politicians attending COP via private jets. They could easily attend virtually but choose not to. One rule for one...
Lol, picking on the little people again. never mind the elite jetting off here there and everywhere, scam. Remember not to use your fans in the summer so the elite can carry on regardless and squeeze in another jet set holiday or fly to their important business meetings..
Until they come up with better alternatives, I'll stick to physical. I'll only grab digital when the price is much lower than physical.
Earth or gaming, though choice
Nah I'm not buying the industry approved mouth piece to use people to digital.
Maybe Ill start buying two copies now
Before taking anything as gospel, check who has conducted the study first. ALWAYS
Sadly, it becomes the ultimate proof that greed outweighs the alleged environmental threat. Given the price differences between digital and physical
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...