
Starfield finally comes to PS5 in exactly one week from now, and I'll admit, I really want to give it a try.
But apparently, that's a terrible idea.
Over the last couple of weeks, as the launch has crept closer, I've been telling people — friends, mostly, not just randoms out on the street — that I'm actually quite looking forward to Starfield. And almost every time, said friends have turned around and told me not to bother. Is it really that bad?!
Now look, as much as I value the input of like-minded individuals, this hasn't been, and won't be, enough to put me off Starfield. I will play it, at some point, so that I can form my own opinion — but it's starting to sound like I should wait for a sale first.
Subscribe to Push Square on YouTube168k

So why am I writing this article? Well, I just find the hate for Starfield quite interesting. As alluded, I haven't played it. My work here on Push Square means I barely have time to touch non-PlayStation gaming platforms, and so I've always just spied on Starfield from afar in the knowledge that one day, Xbox would inevitably slap it on PS5.
I remember the hype before its initial launch back in 2023. There was genuine talk of it being a revolutionary open world RPG, and that Bethesda was about to have a sci-fi Skyrim on its hands.
And to be fair, there were plenty of positive reviews, including the one that I read with much enthusiasm over on Pure Xbox. But it still didn't take long for the negativity to fester.
It was only a matter of days before people were tearing it apart on YouTube — and it wasn't just the usual hate parade from no-name channels pumping out hyperbolic crap. I remember a number of content creators I had a real respect for calling it out as a huge disappointment.

Needless to say, my interest did take a knock. But I've been a Bethesda fan for the best part of 20 years, ever since Oblivion blew my mind with the sheer degree of gameplay freedom that it offered.
I don't want to think about how many hundreds upon hundreds of hours I've sunk into Oblivion, Fallout 3, Skyrim, and Fallout 4 combined. For me, there's just never been anything quite like Bethesda's output — these games have always given me a sense of endless adventure, despite the trademark jank.
To be clear, though, my excitement for Bethesda games peaked during the very first Skyrim trailer — and that feeling's simply never returned. It's certainly not controversial to suggest that the developer's been on a downward spiral for close to a decade, but in a morbid kind of way, that makes me even more interested in seeing what Starfield's all about.
Again, I ask: is it really that bad? The game obviously has its fans, because loads of them have reappeared to write articles and make videos aimed squarely at the fresh influx of curious PS5 users. There's an undeniable hype behind Starfield's resurgence, which is being powered by a major update and a new expansion.

I think there's a hope that Starfield is about to be reborn — at least to some extent — although Todd Howard himself recently came out and told everyone that, despite all the incoming adjustments and additions, Starfield will still be Starfield.
In other words, if you thought it was a "relentlessly, impressively boring" game before — as one of my friends has described it — then this big update isn't going to change your mind.
But surely Starfield is a better overall experience than it was at launch? Bethesda's been updating it for over two years, so there's little doubt that PS5 players are getting the best version yet. Unless it's like... a technical disaster on Sony's system, or something. But let's try not to jinx it.
What do you reckon, then? Am I daft for wanting to finally play Starfield? Is it a game that's deserving of so much hate? Have your say in our poll, and then try to explain yourself in the comments section below.





Comments 57
I tried it on PC a few years back with Mods and still didn't hook me. But I am going to try again on console since that is my primary place to play games.
I am looking forward to it. The biggest thing that I didn't like about the game was not being able to actually fly planet to planet and now that is being addressed. Sure the story isn't the best but I rarely care about story in games, probably from years of exposure to Kingdom Hearts nonsense lol. From what I have read it seems mechanically it is a really great game so will be right up my alley
it has a great Metacritic score. don't listen to reddit.
I sunk 300h on XSX and will buy on PS5 for the new content. No game gets as much sheep like, unwarranted hate as this game.
how about trying to have an opinion of your own, and if it looks interesting, try playing it?
I've been wondering too, it gets all the badmouthing yet it's not even below 80 on MC, is it because it was exclusive or it's genuinely that bad...
I played it back when it launched at a time when my seriesX was not a complete paper weight. It's a solid action RPG. I would recommend if you really need to scratch a sci-fi shooter, RPG itch. But if you are hell bent on this game being Skyrim in space, having deep exploration where you are surprised at what you discover everywhere you venture, you will be let down.
Its story is decent, some cool quests, but the lack of discovery and repetitiveness is a letdown for a Bethesda game. Hence why this thing came out and was forgotten about fast. The industry could have done with or w.o. this game. Would expect better from Todd Howard/bethesda.
I haven't played it, but I've seen the discourse on this and been... baffled? Amused?
I just think, at this point in gaming, we've seen devs and their games improve by leaps and bounds over what they have done in previous generations. Bethesda hasn't done that and, combined with a sense that they're ignoring their fanbase (Fallout 5? ES 6?), people are just tired of them.
I get really angry about the discourse on this game. it's not perfect but I sunk hundreds of hours into it and I loved it. And I'm somebody who has been gaming for 40 years. It's a GOOD game, not perfect but nothing is. It's a good game. The new content looks like it could elevate it to a GREAT game. Just give it a chance. So much blind prejudice against this game it's insane.
No its awful.
I mean if you like the stuck in the ps3 era style of bethesda because theyve never grown since. Then you may be good.
But the sub par graphics, the out dated conversation segments, the fact you load out of the planet and the sheer amount of load screens when ps4 games did a better job and the bland story.
Some will dig it because its bethesda but the reality is, its a bland average game compared to all the newer open world games which came before it.
@Bez87 like you've ever played it. sheep.
I wouldnt go at far as to say its rubbish but once you realise all the planets that you can explore are either big empty rocks or they have carbon copy pirate bases it gets very monotonous , as you gave crimson desert a 6 if you review this, i expect probably a 4 or 5
Played it on Xbox on release and will be double dipping on PS5. I really enjoyed it, it's not for everyone, but if it clicks it clicks. Like all things in life.
It's a Bethesda game and I haven't had a platform to play it on so far so I'm in, but probably going to wait a for a few months, while being immersed in Crimson Desert now and the new Diablo expansion soon.
Maybe if GTA 6 gets pushed back again a bit I'll get more time on it. LOL
Also, as a big fan of an equally loathed space action game, Star Wars Outlaws, maybe play it for yourself and see if you like it, I had alot of fun playing SWO, while the usual online sheep tore it to pieces and missed out on the fun.
Bethesda are done aren’t they.
Still living off the praises off Skyrim which came out 15 years ago now - there’s probably teenagers reading this article who weren’t even born then.
I didn’t mind Fallout 4 but it’s not like it did anything special compared to 3 and New Vegas
Apparently 10 hours in it gets really good, but waiting 10 hours for the good stuff to start is definitely not ideal.
@russ99a I enjoyed outlaws very much even her dodgy 80s haircut 😂
There are so many games I'm excited to play and just don't have the time yet, so a game like this is one I will wait for a substantial discount on. I mean I know I'll get some enjoyment out of it, but the procedurally generated parts seem exactly like the kind of tedium that makes me bounce off games. In a few years, on sale.
I've beaten Starfield on Xbox. Twice. If you enjoyed Fallout 4, Starfield is more of that. In space. Most of space is not very interesting, but the handcrafted content of the major quests is pretty good. Apparently they fixed some of the annoyances the original version had, like space travel basically consisting of browsing a couple menus, so this game that was never that bad to begin with surely is even better now.
I won't be playing Starfield again on launch, but I might buy it in a sale and go for a third playthrough.
I'll definitely play it at some point, but at a deep discount, and once I'm out of the Marathon vacuum lol
Nobody wants you to hate Starfield more than the people that haven't played Starfield.
Without taking into account we're on a Playstation Blog, the hate for divisive games is always much louder than the positive feedback.
Starfield has an 82 on Metacritic. It's a good game by critics standards, and a mixed game by user reviews (sitting at a 6.8)
Crimson Desert is a great comparison to this. The reviews have been middling, but the overblown criticism you'll see won't be from Media Outlets, it'll be from a large margin of people who have been told by their favourite youtuber to hate the game.
I'd like to highlight a specific quote in this article "It was only a matter of days before people were tearing it apart on YouTube — and it wasn't just the usual hate parade from no-name channels pumping out hyperbolic crap. I remember a number of content creators I had a real respect for calling it out as a huge disappointment."
We live in an age where influencers are intentionally profiting from covering controversy and as you said "festering hate"
I won't start a manhunt but just to name one such creator: Asmongold used to play games. Now he covers politics because his channel blew up from the controversy of it all. When he does cover games or media it's often controversial. He would not have such a following if he didn't place himself in this bubble.
Furthermore I think there's something to be said about media influencing our decisions and setting expectations, high or low, before we've even tried a product. So much weight is put on waiting for day one reviews and waiting for their favourite youtuber to form an opinion for the individual. I miss the days of playing games by yourself, for yourself, and creating your own opinion without the incessant, innate need to fit in to the majority opinion.
From what I remember on it's initial release, a lot of peeps said to just wait for a sale and some fixes. But the game may have a lot of those day one issues fixed for the ps5 version.
Not really…? Kinda sounds like counterculture. I’m lukewarm on the game, but that’s because I play every Bethesda game modded.
I do know a friend who plays them unmodded, and I do playfully call him a goose for it, but if you love Bethesda games I don’t see how you won’t enjoy starfield unless you’re particularly allergic to space operas, which your avatar says otherwise.
Yes, Starfield is not good. I can confirm that it fails in basically all aspects and I can have the privilege of saying that because I didn't play it but I read a lot of other people opinions to form my own.
@JDINCINERATOR id say after the first 10 hours you've basically seen all there is to see , I played at launch so every thing was new and I spent over a 100 hours with it hoping to discover something great, i didn't, going to mars the moon and earth is quite cool though.
It’s a good game. Is it the best Bethesda game, no. But it’s a fun space rpg that is very grand in scope. For $50 you can do far far worse in terms of games to buy and enjoy. Put 50 hours into it on Xbox before I sold my series x and only have my ps5.
@Yousef- yeah mods make it better , making everything star wars adds some much needed variety , however im not sure whether sonys stance on mods has changed, and no outside assets are allowed.
what kind of rhetorical question is that. it's a Bethesda game
@Deadlyblack patches wont fix the core gameplay and todd Howard has already said this isnt starfield 2.0
It's Bethesda game. You already know if you like it or hate it.
Played it day one on Xbox, even paid for early-access and it’s the biggest disappointment I’ve had with a game so far, I even took almost 2 months to finish it at just 30 hours as it was such a snorefest, this was like the worst aspects of any Bethesda game all-in-one but without any of the good.
I played Starfield at launch back on PC amd thoroughly enjoyed it. Much of what made those other Bethesda games great is still here, though its a bit more disjointed. But there are some genuinely great quests and locations and the updates since, including those upcoming look smart and will only make it better.
It’s crap, skip it.
Hm, that’s the most constructive advice I can give, but it seems the comment is deemed to be too short. I could try padding it.
Starfield is a janky, broken, half-baked empty promise of something that never gets off the ground. It lacks technical polish, still has performance woes, and is ultimately unfulfilling. Oh, and the disc is a worthless coaster so if you’re intent on punishing yourself by doing a playthrough, you might as well go with the digital version because you’ll be leasing a digital license either way. No permanent ownership here, although that’s arguably a good thing in this case.
I’d wager your time is better spent doing almost literally anything else, but no one can stop you from playing it.
I tried 3-4 hours of it and I was really bored. Someone i knew had played it for about 10-15 and told me it didnt get any better so i gave up.
Why spending so many precious hours of your life with mediocre video games? I will probably never understand that.
I guess ppl can't handle the true
Everyone says the same even ppl that played the game
Just go to YouTube and watch some gameplay videos is a God damn snooze fest
Literally Skyrim in space but way worse
@Dimey I mean there's just as many people that played it and said "meh". Just because you enjoyed it doesn't mean all the negativity around it is "blind prejudice".
For me personally, it was the game that made me box up my Series X and sell it. I sold it to a mate who wanted one mainly for Starfield as he's day one for almost everything Bethesda does, and even he thought it was meh (but he happily got stuck into another playthrough of Fallout New Vegas with framerate and resolution boost via back compat at least).
Not planning on ever playing it but now I'm looking forward to Shoguns review.😎
From what I heard, it’s not worth playing. So listen to me from what I listened to other people.
Fr though, if you have to ask if it’s worth playing or not, then the answer is likely already no.
@lazarus11 Skyrim mods on PS5 have been using external assets for over a year now since modders found a trick to get them in. You can get whole new followers with scripts and external voice acting. I think Bethesda have kept quiet about it.
Stanfield looks fine to me.i will definitely play it.word up son
I remember when this game got featured after a Xbox direct, and i thought it looked pretty good. This, and Fable, were the only Xbox titles that have actually piqued my interest. Then reviews started coming out, gameplay footage, and it definitely soured any enthousiasm i had for the title.
But yeah i still kind of want to try it. But we’ll see, there’s just so many games i plan to buy this year, that this doesnt have any priority for me
No man's sky is better and cheaper. Ps5 Pro enhanced and VR enabled..oh and zero loading after the initial boot up. Its just a massively better game.
The negativity for it IS a bit overblown. But put it this way - I'm a Bethesda fan too, I was excited for it, and it's the first of their games I couldn't finish.
It's not terrible, but ultimately it is a bit boring, to the point I wouldn't recommend it to anyone at full price. When it's in a sale, sure.
There are plenty of people who would have you believe it's worthless and of course they should be ignored, but equally don't listen to people who dismiss any criticism of it out of hand.
Be interested to know what you make of it in the end.
@ShogunRok
I'll be very interested to read your review or similar after you've played it.
On paper, I should be over the moon (no pun intended) excited for Starfield. I love RPG's. I love Sci-fi. However, it really just comes down to it being from Bethesda. I just don't trust that studio.
The only game I liked from them is Skyrim and even then I didn't love it. Tried but didn't click with Fallout 3 or 4. Oblivion just flat out never worked for me. Ran into game-breaking bugs every time I tried to get into it. The reception to Starfield from those who have already played it also hasn't inspired much confidence.
All that said though, I am still curious to try Starfield. Definitely not at launch. I have too many other things I'm currently playing. I could see myself giving it a try on a sale later on.
No, people suck.
I didn't vote as none of the options felt quite fitting. I'm not excited for it but curious enough once it goes very cheap to maybe give it a try.
I played and loved Skyrim at the time and enjoyed Fallout 3. Fallout 4 I had some fun with but already felt like it was getting dated and found the formula getting tired.
As someone who doesn't care about critic reviews AND user reviews, i might give this game a try only because i really liked the presentation, combat and some ideas of this game. Some people here gave their thoughts about the game for me (thanks, guys) and I'm pretty much aware that Starfield isn't Fallout 3 or Skyrim, but i still want to try. Not gonna buy now, though, I'll probably pick this up on sale
I learn something really important: reviews, no matter what kind, are always important when they tell me something objective, like "the game doesn't have fast travel" or "the game crashes a lot and has performance issues". This is the kind of thing that i take into consideration, anything else is "eh". I didn't like Clair Obscur or Helldivers 2 but i loved Possessor(s) (a game described by many as bland) and Gotham Knights (another very mid game), so i really think we should have our own takes and give whatever game we're interested in a try, unless someone has pretty much the same taste as you and they say X game isn't good, then i can value their opinion, but even then...these kinds of things are so subjective. I like that, i like be an individual with an opinion lol
@Dimey HATING A GAME FOR BEING DISAPPOINTING IS COMPLETELY RATIONAL.........
This strange notion that if someone dislikes a game " well then, they obviously havnt played it!!" reasoning is remarkably childish
I think it speaks to society living through the internet and viewing important facets of life through the lenses of"internet"
I genuinely enjoy the reviews from Pushsquare and PureXbox
I don't always agree, but they actually read like a gamer is reviewing them, not a communications major who needed a job
If a game looks interesting to you why not give it a shot?
I put 70hours into it. So I’d say that’s a fair crack. And it’s a 7/10.
It has a few highs, but it has many lows too. It’s just ok overall. So many load screens, so many barren planets, so many repeated bases. The ridiculously stupid power temples. But there’s a few good missions in there.
Is it worth £50-60 (whatever release is)? No. Is it worth £30? Yes it is.
My biggest takeaway is since I completed it, I’ve never had the desire to go back and play a game, nor do I feel I’ve missed it. And that for me is slightly damning for a Bethesda game. Whereas I’ve played fallout/elder scrolls multiple times.
@rjejr Haha, just for the record, I'm not reviewing it.
I have posted this here before, and I know it is controversial, but I loved Starfield. It was my most played game of 2023. My account put almost 200 hours in (although a lot of it was my youngest son base building, which he really loved in that game).
Whether you click with Starfield depends on what you want. This is not a "what is over the next hill" kind of game. It is not a No Man's Sky meets RPG experience. Folks who want that will be disappointed.
It is about going to game hubs, and engaging in the kind of detailed side quests Bethesda has always given us with a space/sci-fi skin on them. That is what I wanted, so I loved it. It has some of the best side quests they have ever done. But if you are looking for discovery and a super responsive open world (aside from a few choices here and there), this is not it.
Starfield has some flaws. This game does not onboard players well, and the first hours are boring and uncomfortable as a result. I also think this game was marketed as more of an exploration game, which left many rightfully disappointed. And, there is one mechanic you have to do in the game pretty often to progress (avoiding spoilers here) that is pretty underbaked.
But if you can look past all that there is a great game here. If you played Fallout 3 or New Vegas or Skyrim for the quests (me!) then you should have a great time. If you are looking for a huge amount of bustling planets to lose yourself in instead of a few hubs-I suggest looking elsewhere.
@Futureshark I'm not reviewing it but when I do eventually get around to playing it I might well write something up.
@TheArt Watch Angry Joe's review on it. Pretty much nails every major criticism people have with the game.
@CallMeDuraSouka nah seems like you're just another sheep
never read so many pathetic comments and blocked so many children before. pathetic.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...