Code Violet begins and ends with quotes by the renowned painter and inventor Leonardo da Vinci.
That feels appropriate — not because this game will be remembered for time immemorial like the Mona Lisa, but because, much like one of Da Vinci's early flying machine sketches, the game is ambitious but never actually gets off the ground.
Set long in the future in a facility at the far reaches of space, Code Violet's titular heroine is rudely awoken when her friend is unceremoniously eaten by a velociraptor. Hate it when that happens.
Unfortunately, Violet has the rotten luck of waking from her slumber in nought but her underwear, and what would you know, her clothes are at the other end of the facility.

This raises questions. It means she must have taken her clothes off the night before at one end of the facility, then walked the corridors in her smalls, being gawped at by the janitors, gone to sleep, and then in the morning would repeat her semi-nude pilgrimage back to grab her trousers before going for a bowl of Frosties.
That doesn't make much sense. But we don't have time to ponder such things. Velociraptors are famously impatient creatures, and before they finish their hors d'oeuvre and come back for the main course, Violet must escape, trousers or no.
So she crouches down, and sneaks out of the room to look for trousers and weapons and maybe an explanation as to who put dinosaurs in space and her on the menu. And she does it all while the camera gets up close and personal with her rump. Oh dear.
The space dinosaur narrative is deeply silly, but the voice acting and storytelling are presented with deadly seriousness. It's like if you put Christian Bale into the 1960s Batman TV show and told him to just do the voice. Tonally, it's weird, but that honestly makes it pretty funny in parts.
The laughter stops once you start playing the game, though. Literally the first thing that happened to us once we had control of Violet was a glitch that got us killed.

We were told to run away from two hungry raptors only for the controller to become totally unresponsive, while the dinosaurs ran around in circles like idiots before nibbling us to death seemingly more through luck than actual judgement.
Once you get your hands on some weapons things don't get much better. The third-person shooting is limp, with guns feeling weightless.
Shotguns should boom, but firing one in Code Violet feels like when you bite the end of the paper off a McDonald's straw and blow through it so the wrapping flies off. Less of a boom, and more of a wildly unsatisfying thwip.
Hit boxes seem erratic, and visual feedback is largely non-existent. It's often unclear if you're actually hitting your target or not until the dinosaur you're shooting at unconvincingly keels over.

Similarly, when Violet is attacked, she doesn't respond in a way that really says, "Hey, a dinosaur is eating me." She just kinda stands there while a dinosaur bashes into her with its mouth open.
Helpfully, Violet has a little armband on that displays her current health, and so even if she's no-selling the attacks from her dino-foes, when the number starts dropping you at least know you're dying.
None of this is helped by the camera, which we're pretty sure in some jurisdictions would be considered a hate crime.
Violet met her demise on more than one occasion while we stared at an extreme close-up of her back because the camera is utterly unprepared to deal with confined spaces, which is problematic in a game that mostly takes place in narrow corridors.

There's not much in the way of guidance either, with no quest-log or anything. Characters tell you to go places, and then you go there. Sometimes doors are locked and you'll need to find a keycard, which means wandering from room to room scouring the floors until you find one.
Occasionally, there'll be a basic puzzle to solve, such as shining a black light on something to find a code or copying button prompts to open a door. It's all pretty standard stuff.
Enemy variety is similarly unremarkable. Velociraptors are the dinosaurs you'll go up against most, but there's a couple of bigger ones too.
There's also some of those little tiddler dinosaurs that chomped Peter Stormare in The Lost World: Jurassic Park. And then there's some of those frilly, spitty dinosaurs like the one that chomped Newman from Seinfeld in the original Jurassic Park. Spoilers for a couple of thirty-year-old movies there.

Real Jurassic Park fans will undoubtedly know that the dilophosaurus — the one with the frills that spits blinding venom — didn't actually have either of those traits in real life, and both were fabricated for the book and the movie.
That means either Code Violet is a stealth Jurassic Park sequel, or the devs based their research into dinosaurs on Steven Spielberg's 1993 blockbuster. We're probably putting too much thought into this.
Another thing people seem destined to spend too much time thinking about is the vast number of saucy costumes you can dress Violet up in for absolutely no reason.
You can dress her up like a 1950s pin-up in a low cut shirt, a sexy secretary in a low cut shirt, and other such costumes, usually in a low cut shirt. Sometimes there are bum cheeks on display.

None of these should be considered practical attire for battling a horde of hungry dinosaurs, and they only add to the aforementioned tonal confusion Code Violet suffers from, since Violet as a character isn't remotely fun. She's dour, and sour-faced, and so she ends up looking like someone who just found out their hamster has died while they're at Comic Con.
In a pivotal moment in the story, Violet bawls at the death of a comrade. The comrade was killed by a space dinosaur, incidentally. And as the tears stream down her face, and the voice actor puts their all into each wail, the camera pans back to reveal Violet is dressed like a sexy cowgirl complete with arse-less chaps.
Actually, it really is quite funny. Maybe you can head-canon that Violet is running a cosplay themed Onlyfans in space and it'll make a little more sense. Whatever. The horny outfits are there if you want them and can be ignored if you don't.

Anyway, all that said, Code Violet does look pretty good in parts. Animations are weird, but some of the sights once you get outside are quite lovely, and Violet has cool looking hair. It's a shame you spend 90% of the game in samey corridors with barely any lighting.
Another thing Code Violet has going for it is brevity. It's roughly six hours long. And we actually got pretty lost at the beginning so it might be shorter for non-morons. At ten or twelve hours this would be a slog. At six? It's still a bit of a slog, actually. But less so.
Conclusion
Code Violet is a mess. Crummy combat, tedious exploration, technical problems. The sexy costumes and horny camerawork seem at odds with both Violet as a character and the tone of the writing. Even at six hours long it's tough to recommend, because in six hours you could just watch Jurassic Park three times. And if you did that, you’d never once feel the need to justify what’s currently on your screen.





Comments 163
Where will the "sex sells" crowd be when this doesn't even blip on charts or the gamer zeitgeist?
Ooof! That’s bad.
@RoomWithaMoose
When you compare this to a game look Stellar Blade it visually looks awful. For sex to sell it actually has to, you know, look appealing.
Damn, I knew it would be poop. I was hopeful of a Dino Crisis-esque romp. Even Regina had silly costumes way back when, but the gameplay was always, sorry still is, fun. Well still no new game for me, living off PS Extra again. 😂
It looked rough from trailers but was expecting it to be passable not a disaster.
It's not the only non-Jurassic Park dinosaur themed franchise to copy Jurassic Park s version of a dilophosaurus. My kids are Dino made and if you buy any toy dilophosaurus it looks like the JP ones
Worst game of the year I bet or maybe Not we will see?
Funny, I remember "warning" people about this Dev and their previous work when people on here where getting all hype ("Ooo it's basically Dino Crisis, and a PS5 Exclusive, this game is gonna be great") well look at that... 4/10 😂
What a freaking review 🤣 the true Jurassic park sequel we have all been waiting for!
Amazing, might have to buy this. Seems awesome and very realistic!
I think the real reason they refused to bring it to PC was to avoid Steam reviews destroying this garbage. The line about not wanting mods was just a lie. I'm pretty sure modders would do a better job at sexy than the developer anyways.
These devs are well known for putting out horrible games, so no surprises here
I knew this would suck, and I'm very disappointed because I really wanted a fun Dino action 3rd person game with a sexy protag. The concept is good, they should have spent another year on development and not take themselves so seriously. This is also the dev that stated they wouldn't release the game on PC because modders are unhinged.
@Dan12836666
For worst game of 2026, the hottest contender is Neo Berlin.
So, halo level floaty shooting, Stella blade level eye candy, and Yakuza level ridiculousness? Sounds great! I joke (partially) but do appreciate the review. Especially mentioning the glitch at the beginning, all too often reviews ignore such things in pre released games (or just released), after the dev promises an early patch to fix them. Either the dev failed to do so here, or this reviewer has higher standards for games that dare to show arse cheeks.
I’ll likely pick this up on sale when patched a bit. Sounds like an amusing weekend.
Hilarious written review, made my morning! Will skip the game though.
I'm gonna buy Ebola Village instead
For a site like this which seems to revel in perving over Stellar Blade and all number of creepy anime games, this review seems weird.
And I lost count of the number of pop culture references. 😂
Damn... Welp guess I'm waiting for a DC remake or sequel
I just watched TheRadBrad playing this game and i thought it was a demo because it looks super janky and stiff as hell like the 1st trailer. But the video said "full game" lol.
Anyway. I've said it back then that people should just get Dino Crisis 1 and 2 over this game, which based on this review i was right.
https://www.pushsquare.com/news/2025/07/dino-crisis-inspired-shooter-code-violet-gets-a-ps5-exclusive-release-date
The funny thing: this game is one of 40+ games that people should follow in this new year 😁
https://www.pushsquare.com/features/40plus-ps5-games-to-play-in-2026
Too bad the good qualities start and end with booba. I was really hoping we might get another Tormented Souls or Parasite Mutant out of this one. Shame.
Never laughed so much at a review. Very well written and will definitely avoid this rubbish.
A couple friends have always told me to play Dino crisis but never really had the interest even though I love the survival horror genre.
Maybe I’ll bite the bullet at some point. 🤔
Gooner game pretty much
Are we really this surprised considering the game was made by the Quantum Error devs lol
If anyone has any questions about this game for some reason you can ask and there's a good chance I'll answer them because I have nothing else to do today.
Never heard of this game before or any aesthetic arguments about it.
So I just watched the MKIceandFire play through.
Looks like a typical third person shooter from 2012 but with better graphics. Albeit retaining the stiff animations of something like RE Revelations.
End Of.
Not remotely seeing much in the way of any sexy elements. Just looks normal to me.
As someone who has been gaming 40+ years, including the 90’s and 00’s, it’s something I’ve seen a thousand times.
A total nothing burger. I’m extremely embarrassed for younger generations of gamers if they find this a big deal one way or another.
@ATaco or! "Sex sells" is an oversimplification. Stellar Blade sold well because it was a good game with a visually appealing protagonist. But if you don't have both, it's clearly not enough.
@naruball quite obviously.
There are websites that give you a highly concentrated dose of it for free, so no one is spending money on a game exclusively for such elements.
It’s like buying a car just because you want a digital radio. I’d just go out and buy a digital radio from Amazon for £50 and save £25k.
But if I want a car, then a car with a decent digital radio, is better than one with a tinny old cassette player.
@Dogbreath yup. Very well put.
Had never heard of this game.
...
Now I wish that I hadn't.
@naruball
It sounds like we're giving gooners more credit than they usually get in that case. Though this is just one person's review, whether people actually buy it will be more telling. I've already seen some trying to defend the flaws away on other's video reviews so there is a contingent of consumers that truly will buy the game just for the...other content, even after hearing the actual gameplay sucks.
I'm not sure the reviewer understands what time immemorial means.
wtf is a gooner
@FredBiletnikoff Ha! You're totally right! Can't believe that one slipped past the goalie. I'm going to put that one down to post-Christmas blues.
Was kinda hoping the game would turn out decent on release, sadly it doesn’t look that way. Think I’m gonna pass on this one.
Not a surprise if you saw the gameplay demo a while ago.
From the first trailer I knew this was going to be a flop.
They didn't stop to think if they should
I was expecting a 3 before scrolling down.
People see a pretty women in a game and immediately shout gooner. It’s getting tiresome
@Toot1st I can't say the word in here but it term use for something that man like to do in their free time
@KillerBoy welll u know we all know someone going to goon to that game just like they did with stellar blade and nier and every game with sexy women
Great review 😂. I almost feel like getting the game just to see how awful it is.
Almost.
That’s a shame, this was quietly looking an absolute blast. I mean how do you screw up shooting dinosaurs in the face in space with a shotgun?
If the gameplay was fun I’d be tempted, but I’ll wait for the inevitable PS+ drop instead. Ridiculous stories that take themselves too seriously is one of the great joys in life.
@naruball nah, Stellar Blade sold because it was Asian studio, good looking dolls and gameplay ripped of soulslikes, but that the same time the world felt empty and uninteractive, filled with some enemies and bosses here and there and minimal interactions. Story wise was.. well.. generic. It sold well mainly because of the dolls. If that game was released with main protagonist looking normal or being a dude, it would not sell well and we all know it.
@Toot1st In the UK a Gooner is an Arsenal fan
I didn’t avoid the Mindseye disaster, but glad I avoided this one. Fool me once, but not twice. At least, I’ve got Avowed to look forward to next month.
@Leinad7 plenty of games have "dolls" and don't sell well. So facts suggest otherwise. Whether you personally felt like the game was empty is irrelevant. It has high scores with reviewers and gamers praising its gameplay.
"If that game was released with main protagonist looking normal or being a dude, it would not sell well and we all know it."
You may want to read my post again.
I'm not defending this game but the reviewer is misleading readers with regards as to why the protagonist wakes up in a state of undress.
I saw the begining of a game on a walkthrough. The reviewer clearly ignore the fact she is captured and it's those who capture her that take her clothes.
The game looks dumb enough as it is without having to mislead to make it seem even more so 🙈
@rustym82 I get the impression that it's because the explanation doesn't really matter. Like Kojima's explanation that a female character couldn't wear clothes because she was breathing through her skin?
@johncalmc I have a question - how does it feel to have written review of the year and it's only January 9th?!
I could not stop laughing.
The best thing about this game is that we get to read one of John’s reviews about it. This has been the highlight of my day.
Well played on the subtitle, that gave me a good laugh.
@Jammer Agreed mate, too many haters these days and they are entitled to their opinion of course but don't be telling us what we should and shouldn't like or creatives how their characters should look.
If others enjoy it and it hurts no one - let it be
@Leinad7 Stellar Blade would have still sold well if the protagonist was that Adam guy instead of Eve. And if it didn't have overly sexualized female characters. People would have treated it just like Lies of P, or Phantom Blade Zero, or something.
@Leinad7 "Stellar Blade sold well mainly because of the dolls"
Senran Kagura was developed by Japan devs and has cute anime girls with booba & asses but it still doesn't sold as well as Stellar Blade 🤷♂️
"If that game was released with main protagonist looking normal or being a dude, it would not sell well and we all know it"
What a weird statement. There's plenty of games with normal looking female protag (or even a dude) that sold well such as:
etc
@PuppetMaster Yeah, except some of these you mention didn’t sell that good as you claim and as good as developer or Sony expected.
…calling it a “gooner shooter” is a LITTLE on the nose, is it not?
That aside, aren’t these the devs who were all “oh nooooo, we can’t release on PC, people might mod our character to look sexy!!!”
Somehow I’m unsurprised this is a buggy mess.
@SeaDaVie Sure, in which country was developed and in which coincidentally sold mostly? That’s the answer.
@RoomWithaMoose
thats only the case when a game is woke unfortunately.
when its not and its bad, its ignored
@ATaco I played Stellar Blade because it was a good game.
All the gooner qualities it has I found painfully cringe.
Turns out sex isn't enough. Your game needs to be good before it'll also sell. Who knew?
@Jammer I wonder when we'll actually see something from JP Survival. They pushed out some vids a while back that only featured footage from the original trailer.
I knew it! From the videos and gameplay they released I knew this would be terrible. Surprisingly, the screens posted here are not pitch black blobs like the shots and videos I’d seen previously.
This is the best title in any article ever. Congratulations
I'll play it on plus and laugh at its absurdity.
The difference is Stellar Blade has great visuals, interesting world/story and actual good gameplay. Whereas this game has none of the above and so had to sexualize the main character to make the game appealing, they are trying to polish a turd.
I suspect that I enjoyed reading this review more than I would have enjoyed the game.
I'm hoping the devs update and fix the game by the time I get to it. So many rpgs to play right now >_<
@Leinad7 Which games that i mention didn't sold well?
This review is one of the best I've seen from this website. Pure gold also: 'Another thing Code Violet has going for it is brevity. It's roughly six hours long. And we actually got pretty lost at the beginning so it might be shorter for non-morons.'
It just sounds like it has ***** level design. Pure aesthetics, nothing functional just like the character. No wonder they delayed the game to re-design her. The whole game feels like an inside joke for 9-10 year old horny boys.
As a Tottenham Hotspur fan, this headline made me laugh more than it should have! If you know, you know.
While I agree that this is nothing but incel gooner slop, you were extremely disingenuous about the opening, or just flat out lying because the main character doesn’t just wake up in bed and need to walk across the facility in her underwear every morning just to get breakfast. Not sure why you spent so much time incorrectly describing the opening few minutes.
@ATaco In the end its still had to be a good game Stellar Blade is a good game with a high grade of polish. Its kinda disappointing to see that her being sexy is the only reason also one of the very few games that doesn't have the 1.0 on the disc.
@SeaDaVie I mean. Men are allowed to be ugly and be the main. Hell, they’re even allowed to be monkeys apparently. But a monkey female protagonist would’ve flopped miserably! In Black Myth though. If you were to put a female monkey protagonist in a game like Sly Cooper, it would do fine.
@Dogbreath
There's definitely some pretty revealing outfits but nothing that should bother anybody as much as it seems to bother this reviewer. I guess there's the whole 'nobody would wear this while battling dinosaurs' argument but the way I view it, it's optional outfits in a game with a futuristic setting and dinosaurs. People take things far too seriously sometimes.
Fanservice is the garnish, not the whole meal.
Thought the subtitle was a jest, alas not, gooners going to goon.
Just to clarify on the outfits - I thought I made it clear but maybe I didn't. The problem isn't the sexy outfits. The problem is that the outfits contribute to the overall confused tone of the game.
Stellar Blade worked because the outfits - whether you liked them or not - aesthetically fit with the world (mostly) and felt in keeping with the stylish action. Here it's like they just threw some saucy outfits in without rhyme or reason. And that's why I said they're fine if you like them but can be ignored if you don't, and even listed customisation as a potential positive at the end.
I just found them bizarre but if you want to play the game as a sexy secretary then go for it!
Gooner poppers sounds like a hoot
Giving the Devs this isn't too shocking.
Bargain bin buy it is!
@ATaco and Stellar Blade is a legit great game and It doesn't rely on sex appeal alone.
Graphics look pretty impressive but…. Not into these kinds of games that lie heavily on, or use as a crutch, “titular” heroines.
On one hand part of me wants to try it because it does sound like a proper 90’s game stuck in a modern title but the glitches and lack of mechanic polish are just too much to warrant a purchase out of principle.
I'm tempted to buy this not for the horniness - if anything, that's a turn off for me in games - but for the bizarre goofiness of it. Maybe on a deep sale.
These devs are severely incompetent and lean on console tribalism to allow gullible fanboys to defend them just because they're PlayStation exclusive, which in turn makes them look like complete fools willing to defend any garbage as long as it's exclusive.
Hilarious as always. Can unpin this from my wishlist of a perfect dark clone gone awry.
Meanwhile AI be like "another human slop".
@johncalmc this was such an amazing review (albeit for a really bad game). Read it out loud to the missus and we were both nearly crying from laughter!
Honestly this review kinda makes me want to buy the game…
@Jammer Well, maybe not Adam the character, but more so if the player character's model was Adam's instead of Eve's. That way, "Adam" would basically have the same personality and role in the story as Eve currently does in the game.
To top it off it isn’t even a nice rump
@rustym82 : really ? I thought someone had asked grok to take off her clothes
Personally I found the review hilarious
Must have been fun to review this pile of Dino do-do.
@janineking I found it ok but just surprised me them purposefully misrepresenting aspect to make a joke
The portions of the review focusing on the ridiculous and revealing outfits don't bother me. Sexy outfits can be fun, or in the way, and as long as they're optional then I don't care too much. Same with the ridiculousness of the plot - does anybody remember the plot of the original Doom? You can't get more basic or meaningless than that, can you?
The portions of the review criticizing camera control, enemy AI, hit indicators (for both enemies and the player character), and weapon feel all hit a lot harder.
If it's not fun, who cares what it looks like? Games need to start with fun. Sprinkling in sexy (or not) is fine, even gaping plot holes or unbelievable scenarios are okay, but without the fun, there's no point.
@rustym82 : poetic licence
@SeaDaVie ha ha! Nothing can take the edge off being a Spurs fan. If we stick with current owners and managers we will soon follow West Ham down
@ATaco Well yeah. Makes you think that quality tends to sell better than sex.
@janineking to quote Alan Partridge "a lie is a lie"
@truerbluer
Anecdotal, obviously, but it doesn't seem like many people are defending the game. I think most realize it's not a great product. And that's not me going to bat for PS fanboys either, definitely seen plenty of people defend games simply for being exclusive in the past, this just isn't one of those times.
Didn't have very high hopes for it being a great game, but was at least hoping it would be passable enough to get when it was cheap.
It's an easy pass then given how much is out there to play.
Another delayed game releases in a bad state. When will people learn?
I was not expecting to read that word here.
Anyway, I believe the game should be reviewed as is. As crazy as some people may think, there is actually good games with heavy adult materials out there. I know there's one on Steam with downright extreme NSFW/18+ content (Code VIolet seems to be very tame in comparison), I think that game is a Metroidvania, and I won't mention the name here (neither do I remember it).
The game is apparently so good that some fans have requested for a SFW option so people who aren't into 18+ stuff can enjoy the game as for what it is. Perhaps keeping the sexual nature of it but censoring some aspects it (like black bars and the such).
It's easy to pinpoint a game with those features if the game itself isn't up to standards, and yeah, said games can sell due to the economics of "Sex Sells", so people will say that such nature are an easy quick buck, but still.
I'm not really that type of person to be honest, and it is a little bummer when there's a good game with excessive sexualization. However, I try to keep that aside as I'm usually not the true target audience, and I'd still play the game if the core gameplay is fun, though I might avoid excessive games like that one I mentioned on Steam.
Which is why I like when games gives you options for such things, Bayonetta 3 did that and I thought it was a welcome -optional- setting (not censorship, mind you, just an option that you can enable if you would like).
She’s runnin around in her skimpies god knows what after her
I thought it was AI slop, but now you're telling me actual people made this?
Put about 3 hours into this. Enjoying the B movie feel of the whole thing. I’ll finish it, especially at 6 hours. Just a good amount of dumb fun mixed with jank.
I try put in words wheres everybody understand...
How the hell some devs can build a game like this? I mean in 2 ways... show boobs and but and a so bad copy of the incridible and classic dino crisis?! They think that boobs and but can sell? Serious. For virgens maybe. But cmon!? Be realistic... why the hell should i buy this crap?!
@Gamer83 You can look at the replies to the dev's X posts, there's a few rabid PS fanboys defending the game solely for console war ammunition with a complete lack of self-awareness of how bad and desperate it makes them look.
However bad and sexual in nature the game itself is, the headline used here is just incredibly tasteless and unnecessary.
@RobN very well said. I was thinking the same. A patch or two and I might purchase this for some mindless fun. As bad as Mindseye reviewed I had a blast with the game and this could be similar, at least for me.
Is this a PS5 exclusive? Is it digital only?
@MrRhysReviews Not surprising when I recall there being some users on here hyping up games like Mindseye, Lost Soul Aside and even Concord, only for those titles to come out with disappointing scores and now those same people either went quiet or acted like they never supported the game to begin with. Total hypocrites lol
Controls yeah thats bad. Costumes. Uh might I remind you Fatal Frame 5 on Wii U also had weird costumes in Japan but Nintendo ones in the west. People can't have fun?
Eternights via Sony's state of play gave me different impressions from the actual game.
To many others are very clear what they are. It varies per marketing, intention, audience.
If its bad yeah I get that. No cover up of things it wants to present will hide those issues. A good game can be in one with other tones.
Also there is plenty of 2000s dirty comedied they weren't made for reviewers they were for audiences.
Some.games are made for audeinces not snobish critics looking for ghe next art piece woth particular stotires to appeal to other literary idiots but in game reviewer form. Sigh.
Its a dumb fun game is what I see but awkward controls/AI that does need fixing yes.
Plenty or seen or heard of many ecchi games or particular tone games that still land in other areas. Not some next big blockbuster movie appeal.
But I find jank varies. To bad or chamring. Depending.
Whether other games to compare to player excitement aside. That I have no reference for.
I saw ghe game awards ttailer and I barelt even remember it just the name is all I can go on.
I get yeah its space dinosaurs, thanks for the frill neck/spit detail there. Not the really bad intro paragraph though to set the scene for the review.
But it also proves a point. Its a video game do we need serious/silly or cohension. I mean games are so serious and dull these days or want to be movies and I struggle to find a game that is gameplay first, but happy woth those that are ok with sillines sif done well.
Many action games have silly plots and crazy scale for a reason.
Also fhe subtitle/headline is a bad joke please edit it.
The game has issues clearly cotnrol , glitches or enemy AI wise and thats pretty bad.
But tone I mean who expected tbis story to be good just entertaining in its own way clearly is good enough.
But not from reviewers expecting a movie spectale like games have to be nowadays. Stigh.
Wow games have to be some particular art. Typical.
A word of warning to reader as a review yes I am ok with that.
Snore give me gameplay that works sure. The personality seems hit and miss for the game but of some appeal, and this review is just a joke and not very helpful.
Pitch: this is the spiritual successor to 1998’s Trespasser: Jurassic Park which also had a female lead where:
@SuntannedDuck2 did ai write this because if not im worried
@johncalmc To be fair, the suit you have to find at the beginning isn't "her" suit specifically, it's just "a" suit. I'm guessing whoever put her in the tank disposed of her clothes, but I just started the game. All said though, it's definitely not a game to be taken too seriously.
@SuntannedDuck2 where's part 2..your posts always have a 2nd part..I feel as though I'm missing out.
Oh boy... I was kinda looking forward to this. It had potential to be something at least half decent... Ah well. At least I save some pennies.... Appreciate the frank and honest review. It was almost funny in places as well!
Just saw Noisy Pixels 2/10 review 😬, less that two weeks in and we are already looking at a strong contender for worst game of the year.
@PuppetMaster
Yōtei, sold much worse than first part in same time, few weeks after release and sales dropped, we no longer even see any noise about the game on media.
Hellblade (first one sold decent, second one landed on GamePass hence sold rather poorly).
Control.. for a new IP 5 mln copies in its lifetime isn’t bad, but it is not really a good sales compared to titles selling 10, or 15 mln copies.
@SeaDaVie which is ridiculous because Horizon series is so dumb, characters, dialogs, lore.. only combat and exploration is fun. But at the same time „PS exclusive” tag makes sales getting higher. Violet game will also sell, even being so bad.
@Leinad7 I think you forgot the context here that i didn't ask for your personal opinion or irrelevant stats like "noise in the media" lol. I asked for official statement from publisher or devs.
Yotei was Sony second fastest selling game since Spiderman 2 and it outpace Tsushima in the same timeline. Sony was happy and claim it as a huge commercial success in their financial report. The game only cost $60 million and it already made them profit from the 1st month. The noise in the media? You mean last month it got multiple nominations including GotY in TGA? And this year when Legend mode released it definitely will get more noise?
https://www.gamereactor.eu/ghost-of-yotei-becomes-sonys-fastest-selling-game-since-spider-man-2-1633723/
Hellblade 1 was a commercial success. It broke even in 3 months and after that it made profit. Ninja Theory fully paid for the devs cost as well published the game by themself. No report about Hellblade 2 but if it's a flop the blame should be on MS.
https://www.pcgamer.com/hellblade-sales-better-than-expected-will-break-even-months-ahead-of-schedule/
For a new IP, selling 5 million copies alone is a great achievement. Now compare Control numbers with some Nintendo games like Xenoblade 2 who has big booba anime girls and Bayonetta 3 with sexy Bayo, both games only sold 3.5 million copies combine for their lifetime sales aka they sold a lot less than Control 😊
With all these proof, i think it's crystal clear that games with booba and asses alone are not enough to sell a game and games with normal looking female protags / dude can still sold well even better than games that rely on booba and asses.
Not gonna lie, I actually like what I've played of it so far.
Looks like a healthy dose of steam indie slop on ps5, I'm in lol
i love to buy this game at...80% discount. So that'll support to dev
Is it ok that you reveal the story saying a character important died in the review? Is it professional?
@Balie3000 Make sure to play the first three Ebola games or you won't have any idea what's happening in Village.
@Almost_Ghostly Lol thanks for the heads up!
@Balie3000 Haha. No problem. 😂
@Gamer83 I think when you read the comments, almost all of those criticising the game have never played so much as 10 seconds of it.
Reminds me of how it was back in the 00's, when all I heard in the pub were guys arguing about which was best out of the Mitsubishi Evo and the Subaru Impreza, and absolutely none of them had driven either car, and they were just regurgitating what they’ve heard on Top Gear whilst they had some crummy Vauxhall Corsa out in the car park.
Taking anecdotal views from forums, doesn’t really gain us much as 99% of them are just regurgitating the review above.
Those who have played the game seem to say that it’s passable, and maybe be worth trying when it drops to 20 quid.
I've only watched play through videos, and what I’m seeing seems to align with the views of those people who’ve played it.
I will probably pick it up when it’s half the current price.
@RoomWithaMoose
Sex does sell, but only in addition to a good game otherwise people will simply watch pron.
One broken, overpriced, boring game doesn't mean that people don't prefer looking at attractive protagonists in their games and other media (male or female).
Or are we still doing that prudish 2020 thing where we pretend all females have to be unattractive to appease that 3% of people that don't actually even enjoy games in the first place?
@TheBloodyNine Blah, blah, blah — same trite stuff as always.
The point was that things don't sell exclusively on sex alone. They never have. Games don't need sex to be successful, and sexy games aren't successful by default. Ergo, "sex sells" is an inaccurate, flawed outlook with which to perceive mass appeal.
Code Violet "ps+ essential, here I come"
@Leinad7 "which is ridiculous because Horizon series is so dumb, characters, dialogs, lore.. only combat and exploration is fun. But at the same time „PS exclusive” tag makes sales getting higher. Violet game will also sell, even being so bad."
Man, this is hilarious. There are so many ps exclusive games that haven't sold anywhere near as much. Not even a 10th of Horizon's sales. Being an exclusive doesn't always help.
@RoomWithaMoose
How is what I said trite? You literally just agreed with me.
You’re being incredibly obtuse by pretending the people saying “sex sells” are simply meaning “put boobs and butt in a game and it will fly off the shelf”. No. No one means that.
They mean that making attractive characters that people like to look at is a bonus that most people prefer, instead of the intentionally ugly, masculine female characters that were the norm a few years ago. This has been the case with media since its inception, which is why the beautiful people have always been prioritized in casting positions.
This is just the reality. People like looking at sexy things. There is nothing inherently wrong with that. I know insecure people hate to accept this.
@RoomWithaMoose also, no one has ever claimed games “need sex” to be successful. And other than the ACTUAL Gooner games in the adult only section of Steam, I can barely think of any games ever made that have sex in them. What are you on about?
"Spoilers for a couple of thirty-year-old movies there."
why do writers continue to employ this "feigned, fake spoiler" trope? is it supposed to be funny? i dont get it.
why not just make it a real spoiler alert? you could use the same exact sarcasm and everything, just before the segment in question rather than after it.
PSA: there were people born every day in the last 30 years that havent seen Jurassic park, or whatever other "common" media you want to think of. ✌️
@Dogbreath
I bought it at full price. Not far enough along to have a real opinion on it yet.
@TheBloodyNine Sigh
I'm not being obtuse about people's intent when platforming sex as the main selling point of a game, you're being ignorant to the droves that literally think this way. Saying no one actually believes that is being incredibly generous and naive.
So fundamentally, you're just wrong here. You can argue that I'm the one ignorant to their assertions, but I'm fairly certain I'll have a much easier time showcasing my proposition than you would moderating the worst takes one can find online. There are, after all, legitimate misogynists in this world.
So, to clarify: YOU mean that making attractive characters that people like to look at is a bonus that most people prefer. Which is a much more modest claim, but still one I reject. I don't give a s*** how attractive my avatar is, and I think the majority from the vast gamer population would agree rather than disagree. Which is admittedly a harder thing to prove, but I would posit that most of the best-selling, well-renowned, iconic games and game characters are not sexy.
As for people having a preference for attractive female characters over "masculine" types, again, no one gives a f***. Ignoring how this is an inherently sexist thing to say ("women can only be attractive if they absolutely adhere to contemporary standards of feminine beauty"), if a game's good, it can star anyone. I don't think most would humor the thought-experiment of Hellblade, but sexified to 11. It's irrelevant to the game, and hence isn't a general preference. Some people would prefer that, I'm sure. People that think an unconventionally attractive woman has no reason to exist, or instance. But for most people, most characters — female or otherwise — do not necessitate sex appeal. It's not a "bonus" if they're sexy, either. I don't play Bayonetta and think about how t&a makes the game better. I play it 'cause it's a good f***ing game. The t&a is fine, but it isn't where the game derives value.
Again, saying "people like looking at sexy things" is myopic. This is how a terrible, passé-for-the-'50s ad man thinks: "just put some boobs next to your vitamins and it'll sell like crazy." When used effectively, sex can be an effective selling point. It isn't effective by default, however. Otherwise, Carl's Jr. would be the #1 fast-food restaurant in the USA (if you're too young or grew up in another country, just look up their old commercials on Youtube and you'll immediately see what I mean).
And that's for something as cynical and artificial as an advertisement. We're talking about video games, here — we're talking about art. Your opinion is to say, "Sure, the Mona Lisa doesn't need cleavage, but I think a lot of people would prefer it if it had cleavage."
Removed - inappropriate; user is banned
@TheBloodyNine Are you saying misogyny doesn't exist apropos gaming anymore? That's comforting to know; I'll be sure to let any women recently offended by games or gamers know that.
Oop! Comment removed. I was in the midst of replying to the rest, but that's all gone now. I think this opener sufficiently and elegantly said just about everything I needed to say, anyway.
To clear the air a bit, though: Try to understand, I'm saying sex doesn't guarantee success. If you agree with that statement, which you have on several occasions, I don't really understand what the point of arguing with me is. It seems to me that you legitimately don't understand why normalizing sexy woman might be problematic. I implore you, go find someone smarter than me who's an actual authority on womanhood both in and out of fiction. Actually absorb their ideas. You don't have to agree with them, but try to understand and sympathize with a different perspective from your own. Believe me, gaming as you know and love it will remain unchanged from just hearing out differing opinions.
Removed - discussing moderation; user is banned
Removed - unconstructive feedback; user is banned
Removed - flaming/arguing
@RoomWithaMoose Ditto.
@TheBloodyNine I'm imploring empathy. You're denying misogyny exists, consider the position that overt sexiness can be problematic problematic per se, are having a tantrum over a removed comment, and completely ignored my hope that you might try enlightening yourself to different perspectives.
You kinda suck not because I disagree with you, but because you kinda suck.
@RoomWithaMoose Lmao, no you're virtue signaling, gaslighting and throwing strawman arguments out there as an objective fact while trying to take some passive aggressive moral stance.
I don't need to "enlighten" myself to your vague claim that fictional media is somehow harmful to you. Everyone outside a tiny, heavily moderated echo chamber knows you're full of sh*t.
If boobs and butts in a game is so offending and "problematic" for you, don't play it. Trust me, you'll be ok. Not everything is the societal dilemma that you think it is.
@TheBloodyNine You know, "virtue signaling" implies feigning virtue for some selfish gain or status. It is not the same as just being virtuous, and it's a weird way to insult anyone for expressing an opinion that you are asserting has objective virtue.
There's no gaslighting here. I'm not trying to recontextualize any of the conversation to obfuscate what actually happened. I referenced misogyny, you said that's not a thing in modern gaming. You quoted my "problematic" comment as though it proved something bad about me,etc. These are all things that actually happened.
Strawman. Gosh, did you learn your entire vocabulary from pseudo-intellectuals arguing on the internet? I'm not misrepresenting your claims to beat down easier ones. You said misogyny isn't a problem, I argued that. You said people have a preference, I argued that. I did start ranting more about the topic in a general sense. But I still very clearly targeted specific things you said. Honestly, had a bit of a hard time consistently rebutting your comment when you seemed to contradict your intent by deemphasizing the necessity of sex appeal (so why even respond to my first comment to begin with?). But that's not me strawmaning — that's not what strawmaning is — this isn't what any of these words mean!
Sexist media isn't harmful to me; I'm not a woman. But I understand how it can be harmful to women. Because I'm not in an echo chamber (I'm not the one with the Reddit-alumni vernacular). I understand there are many different perspectives in this world, and try to value any I don't see harm in.
I never said boobs and butts are offensive — they aren't. Something, something, strawman (now I don't have to engage with your claim! Isn't it fun using pointless, weightless words to dismiss arguments without actually having to refute them!).
And, to finish: Literally everything is a societal dilemma. Just because something isn't problematic for you, doesn't mean it isn't problematic for someone else. And, funny thing, society is meant for everybody, not just you.
Removed - discussing moderation; user is banned
"I was in the midst of replying to the rest, but that's all gone now."
Never said I didn't read your comment. I didn't read ALL of it, but I was reading it and responding to it. So no clue where the, "you apparently didn’t read it because it was removed," accusation is coming from.
So, immediately, you're approaching this from some overly paranoid, self-victimizing position. "You conspired against me and are lying about it!" Not what happened, dude. I didn't flag your comment, and — guess what — I've also had comments deleted on PushSquare before. I didn't throw a fit about it; it's their platform, they can delete what they want. Pertinent to your claims at their expense, I can confirm they don't exclusively delete comments of a certain ilk.
Between what was said before, this new paranoia, and supposedly 'Ignoring' me because we had a disagreement on a gaming website, I repeat: You kinda suck.
@PuppetMaster Man, that was too long, I admit I read only 30% I stopped reading when you tried to convince Yōtei is some kind of best seller or something, while having a price tag $10 lower than Tsushima, it falls far behind it in sales numbers in similar time period. You may want to check that before you start arguing, after release it sold well, then dropped and sells slow now. It will not reach Tsushima sales, just like most of their sequels did not reach original game sales (Forbidden West, TLOU2, SM2, Ragnarok.. they all sold much worse than the first game). Why? Because (you will pretend you do not see that) after few years man start to notice they are all similar, lazy sequels with little efforts and evolution, no creativity at all. I am getting tired of playing the same all over again.
PS. If you reply, please try to make it shorter
@Leinad7 You stopped reading because i provided all the facts that proof you wrong and it hurts your feeling. Now you just repeating the same line like a broken record 🤷♂️
You even forgot the topic isn't about sequel vs previous games sales but games with normal looking protag vs games that rely on sexed up dolls sales. Now, you go watch this game sold a lot less compare to Ghost of Yotei or Horizon.
PS. If you don't have anything new to add to the argument, please DON'T REPLY. You already make yourself looks like a dumbo with your ignorant statement 🙏
@naruball I think he lives in different dimension than us where every PS exclusives always sold really well with Horizon numbers 😁
@Hi569 I post long sentence or in small amounts. Why is it it's always AI when someone posts in small amounts or long posts and has something to actually elaborate and say something. Whether my points are intelligent or not, it says a lot I can't make long posts without everyone have some shock about it.
I think outloud and break comment section limits of Youtube and news sites character limits to say things, I don't care. I don't small talk.
@Northern_munkey Didn't have a part 2 for this one. I may edit it later I may not.
@Dogbreath mitsubishi evo hands down. Does driving them both in Dirt 2.0 and EA wrc for over 500 hours combined count as experience?
@Toot1st a gooner is an arsenal fan.
@SuntannedDuck2 oh come on its like waiting for the godfather part 2..the suspense is killing me.
Removed - offensive remarks; user is banned
Removed - discussing moderation; user is banned
Lol @ GOONER SHOOTER 💀💀💀
@Northern_munkey Maybe in the next article XD Or I'll come up with something.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...