Battlefield 6 is the best the series has been in years. EA and its collective of Battlefield Studios are clearly keen to get this one right. And while this military outing isn't a slam dunk, it easily delivers on its promise of high-octane, cinematic, and explosive multiplayer action.
Battlefield 6 marks the return of the modern military setting, and it does so with its most comprehensive offering in some time. With a full campaign, the return of Portal, and of course, the multiplayer, there’s a little something there for everyone.
The campaign is easily the weakest of the bunch, though. Across roughly six hours, you’ll blast your way through the mountains of Tijikistan or sneak around the alleyways of Cairo. Its visual flair, combined with stellar gunplay, keeps things fresh enough.

From a daft blockbuster perspective, we enjoyed working our way up the townhouses of Brooklyn or going hell for leather as we made the advance on an enemy base.
However, if you’re hoping for a searing military narrative, you won’t find it here. The Battlefield 6 campaign takes itself a little too seriously and tries its very best to come across as a grown-up military thriller.
Whenever the game cuts back to its cinematics with a political figure, interest dips. There are little pockets of narrative intrigue, but most of the time, when people started yapping, we just wanted to get back to shooting. Suffice it to say, you shouldn’t buy Battlefield 6 solely for the campaign. It’s an alright side dish, but nothing more.
Something you certainly should buy Battlefield 6 for is its multiplayer. After the simplicity of the Battlefield 1 and Battlefield V era, and the almost sterile feel of Battlefield 2042, Battlefield 6 just feels right.
Movement is slower but feels deliberate. Weapons are heavy and powerful. The visuals are packed with VFX for smoke, explosions, debris, and the new tactical destruction, which can tear the faces of buildings down. If you’re looking for those classic Battlefield moments, then Battlefield 6 has them in abundance.

Whether it’s the roar of a jet as it tears through the sky above you, or the whizzing of scattered bullets as you dive for cover, there’s a magical sort of carnage that can be found in the multiplayer offering here. It has an electric energy that we haven’t felt in the series for quite some time.
The multiplayer offering is fairly substantial, too, with a variety of modes, from returning classics like Breakthrough and Conquest, to new ones like Escalation. They all work the same, more or less; go here, shoot that, capture or defend the point. But the toolbox of weaponry, class perks, and vehicles give each its own fresh, dynamic feel.
We suppose that some may feel the current roster of maps is somewhat lacking. There are our favourites like Siege of Cairo, Liberation Peak, and the remastered Operation Firestorm. But some are a little samey, like New Sobek City, or the one-two punch of Manhattan Bridge and Empire State. We’re certainly keen to see new maps as post-launch content kicks off.

However, the inherent grind and gameplay loop are simply too good for a lacking map roster to spoil the fun. The levelling and weapons grind is slow yet steady, making time invested in each weapon and class feel purposeful and worthwhile. We loved slowly shaping our favourite carbine into the perfect killing machine, with numerous attachments that can vastly change the feel of a gun.
Whether it's weapons, gadgets, or even the plentiful amounts of weapon camos, there’s a grind to be found for all levels. We reckon some may bounce off this as it’s, dare we say, a bit more hardcore than Call of Duty’s levelling system. But we reckon this will give Battlefield 6 more longevity.
If you need a break from the main multiplayer, Battlefield 6 also sees the return of Portal, a custom level and map maker. Via a PC app, players can design their own maps and custom game modes, and this has been severely upgraded from its debut in Battlefield 2042.

We’re still not entirely convinced it will end up being anything other than an XP farm, like it was in 2042, but there are some fun examples tucked away in this mode. Like a recreation of Call of Duty’s Shipment map, or wave-based zombies modes, or even silly stuff like hammers and knives only. There’s a noted lack of polish, which contrasts with the rest of the Battlefield package, but we’re excited to see if anything cool comes from the community down the line.
All of this is wrapped up in what is easily the most polished Battlefield launch in recent memory – potentially ever. Even after extended sessions with the multiplayer, the biggest issue we came across was the dropped frames when the game transitioned into gameplay at the start of a match. Otherwise, it runs flawlessly on both PS5 and PS5 Pro, with 60 frames per second as a baseline, and 120Hz modes available too.
The PS5 also goes a long way to amplify the experience, with stellar DualSense haptic and adaptive trigger support. The rumble of explosions on Sony’s pad is incredibly immersive, and you can feel the chunkiness of LMGs through the triggers.

What we love even more, though, is the sound design. The default mix is impeccable as it dynamically shifts from bombastic and expansive soundscapes to echoey and tinny corridors. These play off excellently with the 3D audio available on PS5, especially with a decent pair of headphones. The War Tapes mix takes things even further – we highly recommend checking that one out.
Conclusion
Battlefield 6 is a phenomenal multiplayer experience that immerses and impresses with its chaotic mix of tight gunplay, best-in-class audio design, and the cinematic flair that made us love the series in the first place. The campaign isn’t anything to write home about, and Portal has yet to fully prove its worth, but they act as additions to what is easily the best Battlefield in over a decade.





Comments 97
Love that Tony Curran is the baddie, he was in Modern Warfare 3 as well so clearly gruff Weegie works for military men. Big Celtic man too, might just side with the baddies instead.
There was talk of the campaign still having it’s basic elements worked on like 6 months ago, so yeah, pretty much what I expected in that regard.
Boooo No buy for me then campaign wise.
I thought they may have a bigger show piece campaign to show up COD.
Such a shame as to they don’t make many battlefield games.
A military shooter campaign just makes me yearn for Spec Ops The Line remaster.
I never buy multiplayer military shooters for the campaign. Just very happy Battlefield multiplayer is back into form after many years now. The beta was great. COD's not so much, cut and paste as usual. Between this and ARC raiders that's all anyone would need
Unless there is gyro aiming implementation, "Brilliant use of DualSense features" should not be included in the pros column.
I don't buy multiplayer military shooters, unless I'm doing it just for the campaign - so I'm rarely interested in Battlefield or COD.
For those of you that love this stuff, hope it's good.
Let's be honest. Who is also going to spend £60/£90 on this just for the 6 hour campaign? Definitely not me, I'm all for the multiplayer on this, can't wait.
Well it seems better than most Battlefield games in recent years but won't take the crown of 'best' BF camp[aign ever - which currently is held by BF:BC2 in my opinion.
I do enjoy playing the Campaign before jumping into 'Competitive' Multi-player - I like to get a feel for the Game, the vibe, the weapons etc before I face opponents - although I did enjoy the BF6 beta.
It seems the MP is the best since BF3 but I also think the lack of Campaign was a big mistake for 2042 - who thought that their MP/Portal would be 'enough' as few played or finished their Campaigns. I expect the campaign will be somewhat generic and relatively short, but I'd rather that than nothing...
I preordered it and will receive the game tomorrow! Will go directly into the multiplayer with my mates
EDIT: feel free to add me
Thank you for the insight, much appreciated.
BF campaigns were always a bit ¤%&#, with the lone exception of Bad Company 1. That campaign was more open-ended and played to the strengths of the series, while the rest simply copied COD with awful results.
I wont be buying it at all due to who now owns EA. I cancelled my preorder which was a shame cause I was looking forward to this game.
Bot filled lobbies? You are aware the servers don't go live until tomorrow so how the bejesus do you expect to find online players? Am I missing something here?
@Tasuki they don't own them yet..
Does anyone honestly play these type of games for the campaign?
If I buy this at some point down the line, I'm 100% buying it for the single player campaign. I've never really been a fan of the multiplayer in BF even if Bad Company had a decent multiplayer component.
We're you at all able to make use of the gyro aiming? That was the one thing I wanted to use from the beta but it wasn't working.
I haven’t really played a military campaign in a while. I stopped playing COD years ago so for me it’ll be a slight change up from what I’ve been playing recently. Hopefully I’ll enjoy it. Obviously MP is the main focus but I was also looking forward to the campaign.
I have basically hard quit most military FPS games for the better part of a decade. Last one I played was BF4 and before that, Call of Duty Black Ops, the first one!
Despite my issues with them and the fact that I tend to get burned out fairly quickly, I am giving this game some serious consideration. I should have jumped on the beta when I had a chance.
Nobody buys Battlefield for the campaign surely ? The previous campaigns were mediocre at best, not that I ever finished one.
Multiplayer only for me, this one looks like a return to form
@StitchJones yeah I've preordered this to tide me over till the Arc Raiders server slam and then it's launch.
And here I am. Waiting for HLL:Vietnam. Ill play this when it hits ps+.
@Nepp67
Arma has it. Turned it off in 5 seconds. My soldier and me got a stroke.
I DO usually buy games for the campaign...so this is a bummer for me. That said, I do play a good bit of Portal even if it's not why I buy Battlefield, so I'll still probably pick this one up on sale down the line.
@Northern_munkey Other people with early review copies
I only buy these kind of games for the campaigns. Battlefield have had some really bad campaigns though recently, no generic story, just random levels which i hate. COD have been ok with the blops games, but i miss games like cod aw and ghosts.
I actually dont understand why people like playing the mp components, but thats just me.
Yeah i was buying this for the MP not a 6 hour campaign, its a nice extra but never the main meal.
@ElkinFencer10 I get that but the servers still don't go live until tomorrow and even if the early access servers are up they ain't going to find a huge amount of people populating them..it really was a silly comment..
I buy these games for the campaign. Mostly because I am far too bad to bother playing online multiplayer. So this is very disappointing to hear 😩 Another PSPlus wait then.
@old_gamer74 I'm the same, but my buddies and I set up Portal servers full of bots that we put a password on so it's just us and a bunch of bots. You get the multiplayer gameplayer without getting killed five seconds after spawning.
Say what you will about COD but you gotta respect that they still put in some effort on their campaigns. Sure they aren't always good but they've hit more than they missed. BF campaigns have almost always missed outside of Bad Company.
@ElkinFencer10 this is a cool idea 👍
@Northern_munkey The servers were online for most of our review process, but there weren’t enough people with access to the game to fill them. This is why we’ve done the right thing and gone with a review in progress that’ll be updated with a final score next week.
When did Battlefield start single player campaigns? Definitely didn’t start out that way. Not a core part of BF. BF Bad Company 2 had a fun, but short campaign if my memory is correct. Moot.
I bought it for the campaign, and the bag you get for pre-ordering.
It’s an EA game. Is anyone surprised the campaign has no substance?
@HRdepartment Kind of a weird comment when Split Fiction released this year.
@DennisReynolds that was made by hazelight, i guess EA is the publisher?
So is it bot matches but no mode for it? Just 'fills in with bots' hmm. That's my guess, not surprised but worth asking.
Also Battlefield Studios? So not DICE? Not Criteion assisting? So just as shortened thing for the site/fitting space, understandable I guess. If regular enough or people wanting to know more can elsewhere.
Interesting choice of Circle symbol/image in the review there. Understandable the setting, the theme, tone and what they are going for or inline with older Battlefield which is a good thing.
Campaign being a bit particular on it's theming/story sure, but what is the GAMEPLAY, seriously what is with reviewers doing the bare minimum, maybe it is just the shooting, stealth, door breaches, I don't know, the trailers are only so much.
I know they won't do the swap feature from 2 Modern Combat again, but who knows, maybe they just don't show it in the trailers.
I've played so many PS3/360 (not as many on Wii, PS2, Xbox or GameCube but getting to many of them over time) with plenty of mechanics. Battlefield may be what it is but you never know.
Heck I remember the 2042 gimmick whatever that was? Or the battle royale? Is that what Portal is, barely know what that is, I didn't play it but I'd still like to know.
Is there squad commands? Or is the squad just 'there' around you. Who knows.
I don't buy a game to play 'cinematic, themes and story' regardless of the audience it's for.
I buy a game for gameplay, so knowing if it's heavy, or floaty or typical Battlefield but slight (if the reviewers know depending on who gets put to a game or the last time they played the series sure that factors in).
Sometimes they may have a hacking minigame, how am I supposed to know?
I get it's a review in progress, I get this more applies to multiplayer but if most of the game is clear how it feel before launch or day one patch, or even prototypes, people want to know. I want to know.
Heck if I see a prototype with different level design I think it's cool ,let alone how a character's moveset of options is or feels.
It's why I find most games suck, some are fair on heavy, but most aren't and put me off. At least for 3rd person games more then 1st person ones.
I expect the game to be 'typical' but you never know, how am I supposed to know, it's not mentioned.
It's like with racing games I have to check the menu footage (the rare people that do which is annoying as I don't care what the graphics/physics look like all the time, I want to see the menus, what it is like, what dumb lobby syncing garbage, it slows down the game and is pointless if playing singleplayer, so it is going off because they can't be bothered to put a sub menu for it anymore just annoys me), and I end up just giving up or buying the game to see the menu modes/progression structure. Or emulating it if it's old enough. Modern games barely offering much modes anyway, some shooters have but most others that have that focus, are generic and too low on modes or progression excitement at all. Just 'bare minimum, play for 20 hours, snore'.
6 hour campaigns don't bother me at all. If they have the story/ideas they want to present by all means. I'm not bothered by that.
@ReacH EA has an Indie funding/publishing program, thing so yes. The case with all Hazelight releases pretty sure, was the same with Unravel, the same with Fe, or any other Indies they have given funding too.
There is the odd ones we see this with from time to time from big companies besides more Indie or lower budget or any other region publishers that fit that scale.
When has anyone ever bought a Battlefield game for the single-player? Multiplayer has always been where it's at.
@ReacH Yep publisher and funded by them.
@Deadp001 Yep only the singleplayer here. Never tried Battlefield multiplayer I think before. Tried some COD multiplayer (offline modes more so, odd online but not much). So I don't pay for any subscription for PS+/Xbox Live, never have never will. Just not the type of play/motivation I have for games.
Rather campaigns, side mission modes, etc.
Did campaign co-op when it used to be a thing, last I remember was either COD BO3 or maybe some Dialbo clones like Nine Parchments or Enter The Gungeon. Haven't done offline family multiplayer since maybe Halo 4 I think.
Racing games same thing, for event/mode variety, not multiplayer, arcade/campaign modes for singleplayer yes.
Party games not as much and even then singleplayer.
Bot matches in the older games sure, even Killzone bot matches, Unreal Tournament. Star Wars Battlefront more 2004/2005 versions.
Space Marine 2 was ok was just a Space Marine 1.5 to me, in good and bad ways.
Buying up PS2/3 era ones, Titanfall 2 was probably the last great (year wise, of course still buying/playing older ones older then 2017 in 2025) one I enjoyed, besides Splatoon 2 (more a platformer with guns campaign but still, will get 3 eventually, 2's was the most smart use of a grapple in a shooter I had fun with, and that's saying something as more grapple uses I find boring in games other then maybe Ratchet and even then the momentum doesn't do much)
Even then most if not all I'm playing nowadays is older shooters singleplayer for their weird mechanics (Singularity has been a blast with it's time device mechanics and weapons, tone/atmosphere, Time Shift was fair but got awkward at points, Legendary was ok for it's mythology to contemporary idea, then again all of Spark's games were hit and miss but still bought them all, Vanquish/Binary domain were fun, Bodycount has it's issues but I still enjoyed it, etc.),
Even Psi Ops for PS2 has been fun. Maybe or maybe not a shooter and more action adventure but Alice Madness Returns was fun. Wolfenstein 2009 or Clive Barker's Jericho started.
odd stories, themes and such, that and also more mutliplayer shooters means less singleplayer ones coming out these days, that or many haven't been that great, new or existing IPs.
@LiamCroft fair enough but maybe you should just wait until the game is released then publish the review..
Was gona say the last good BF campaign was BC2, but then I remembered the different story missions in BF1 were very good. I usually just play the campaign for spectacle and to get a feel of the guns without getting absolute hammered by other players.
As usual the campaign seems like an after thought. When will devs realise not everyone wants to play online. Maybe I'll pick it up when its in CEX for next to nothing.
@stefan771 "I bought it for the campaign, and the bag you get for pre-ordering."
More money than sense then? 🤣
Ironically the only reason I would buy such a game would be for its campaign and this explains why I've not bought this or COD for quite some time now
The older I get, the less interested I am in mindless multiplayer. I love a good fps campaign but we've had slim pickings with only Doom, Wolfenstein, Halo, Farcry Titanfall, Metro and a few others doing it for me in the last ten years. The cinematic and bombastic COD campaigns were fresh in 2009 but always lacked a sense of progression which is kinda key for many video games not to mention they have poor/predictable/repetitive AI.
I was hoping for a return to form a la Bad Company only with contemporary production values but the money is in the MP these days.
Edit: I will say Ready or Not is still great fun in single player (if better with friends).
@16BitHero That's the difference with COD and Battlefield. COD is mindless running around like a headless chicken, trying to get kills, where-as BF can feel tactical. The atmosphere is second to none too.
I caved and ordered it today even though I expect I'll end up regretting it. Whilst I really like having something multiplayer that's just pick up and play I do find these games increasingly difficult to play. Skill issue or not, I don't care. Either people in general have gotten better or I've gotten worse or maybe the matchmaking isn't what it was but I certainly don't find them as 'fun' as when I played them back in the day. Both COD and BF...I was never any kind of elite player. In fact far from it. Probably worse than average if I'm honest But I still enjoyed many a drunken hour playing with friends and random people. These days I just seem to get outplayed and outgunned every single game I play. I figure there has to be lots of players around my mediocre standards and yet I never seem to find them and instead just have to be happy propping up the bottom of the leaderboard. One thing I do like about BF is that you can be a useful team member in different ways beyond just being a KD ratio jockey but that's also not as good as it once was due to the paucity of voice chat.
Removed - flaming/arguing
@CaptainWow this is why I've decided not to get it, especially at launch. I always remember being reasonably competitive back in my younger days but now I'm 40...something? I actually don't exactly know. 42 or 43 my reaction times just aren't what they were. I just get increasingly more annoyed when I spawn, die, spawn again, die again. It happened in the beta and my wife said "i don't know why your playing that game because you just swear all the time" made me think to myself If was actually enjoying it or just playing it.
@Kidfunkadelic83 I'm in the same boat. At our age, I just cannot be bothered to entertain randoms. I'm happy with the campaign & maybe some co-op with mates, but that's it.
I'll buy this solely for the campaign, but I'll happily wait 12 months at least for the sale I want.
LOL. Placed in a queue of 250,000 to wait and play the game I've already exchanged actual money for. Modern gaming is absolutely f***** (and anyone replying to this with 'What did you expect?' or the usual desperate attempts to rationalise utter nonsense? It's your fault it's f****** btw).
@CaptainWow Well... What did yo... Oh crap! Never mind.
Chances are so many are allowed at once whilst they slowly increase the numbers so not to overload the servers at once.
I've spent the last few hours playing the campaign and have enjoyed it quite a bit. I haven't played a military FPS since Modern Warfare 2, so I don't mind that it does nothing new.
@Kidfunkadelic83 I've got 10 years on you buddy and I'm having a blast. I guess it takes us senior gamers to show you whipper snappers we still have what it takes to be competitive..especially on EA wrc rally 🤪
@HallowMoonshadow thanks, I feel it's slightly too easy so far on story mode but I don't want the frustrations of a poorly implemented hard mode as reports say it becomes this nearer the end of the game. I'll stick to story for now and I'm enjoying the game so far.
The most frustrating aspect of the campaign is that you cannot play it if the servers are full!?!?
I'm around halfway through and it is dull as dishwater. Laughable characters. Really bad from a military training aspect, everyone is so dumb. It's like a fox network drama. Every other Battlefield Campaign is leaps and bounds over this, and actually fun too!
The saddest part is that I'll probably do it a few times over for the Platinum 🤣🙃
@Northern_munkey "especially on EA wrc rally"
Come back when you know how manual gears work 😜
Glad your enjoying BF tho mate. I may get it soon to get some games in with you bud.
@Kidfunkadelic83 I've been slowly getting used to manual gears..
@daveofduncan Obviously you did because you commented.
I've seen a few reviews and countless videos of this, mostly seeming to praise it as the 2nd coming of BF. Can someone explain to me why it's so much better? I honestly can't see much difference between this and every other modern BF game..? And with the smaller maps it seems to be going even more towards being a COD twitch shooter.
Didn’t manage to get on BF6 today at all, the campaign kept getting stuck and sitting in a black screen and just didn’t connect to the online servers, I’m sure it’ll sort itself out in time and no rush to platinum this one - guess there’s a stuff ton of ppl trying to play this one,
Also single player being unpolished is an understatement, sure BF was better at doing SP before
All in all, a great game
@WobberleyBob Thing I always find is people were ok with it in 7th gen when it was $50, you check the HowLongToBeat or longplay videos length times ok. What were 7th gen lengths? What was Space Marine 2's length? Titanfall 2? Any others? Immortals of Aveum was a bit more.
Did people play other modes in any games at all? When they had 3 modes? Or just the 1 mode?
Vanquish was no multiplayer just campaign and side challenges, Space Marine 2 has 3 modes.
People seem to forget the 6 to 10 or a bit more, whether defeated by enemies a lot, intel to collect and more.
People need to wake up and realise that yes the cost is high, the hour counts were similar, the set pieces and cost is a lot and people expect too much.
But there is a reason I play many genres, look at the evidence or what gameplay I want, not some worlds/themes and ignore the math.
Borderlands series like any RPG has sizeable length in teens to 20s to whatever else you choose to do. Sometimes horror games did too.
Collectors pay attention to this besides how the annoying second hand market works, tell the good/bad games, etc., it seems most people that move on seem to forget, they remember the memories (or if new to gaming they don't have that reference) but otherwise people seem to forget what games actually had.
Just because people want value for money/play a bunch of open worlds doesn't mean all games are the same length. RPGs were inflated back then, still are now of hour counts and limits locations (depends on the scale, what quests, etc.), grinded, progressed, watched cutscenes, even padded out battles in hack n slashes add up.
People seem to forget this. That & I'd rather a shorter game with good mechanics then padded out boring skill trees/dull set pieces and more, but we don't get that anymore, if the set pieces are good enough and short I won't mind.
Even Uncharted is reasonable length, Last of Us 2 is inflated of hour length.
I won't spend full price on Battlefield 6 either just to make that clear, but for what they are pulling off yeah, look up prior games in the series/other genres/games and what they offer in the games or hour counts.
Besides Ghost of Yotei was cheaper to make then Spiderman 2 or many others, different hour counts, budget and more, yet it's full price, is anyone questioning that at all NO! Not everyone sees the budget or compares that and what it goes into. Do they?
Does everyone want a 3 hour movie with filler? No.
Versus how other players buy it, play it on whatever difficulty, understand the game enough, be defeated a few times, understand what the games wants the player to do, etc. fire fights, directions, paths, whatever the case.
Part 2:
I own literally so many PS3/360 era shooters, many of the trilogies, one offs, popular ones and forgotten games, they all were 6 to 10 maybe 15 hours, depending on what you did, sure I get defeated a lot, I may look for intel/other collectibles, I may misunderstand what the game wants or I maybe give up if I can't beat a section, come back and either still can't or can. Depending what the game is asking from me.
I beat Battlefield 3/Splintercell Conviction each day 1 weekend, never done that since or with MOST games (those 2 just were an exception that time) and I never try to beat them all at once, it's not fun and I can't be bothered to go that long playing, I take breaks with the games across a period of time.
Sure I get games cheap so there is that nowadays and it's not comparable I won't deny that, but even still, back then full price or nowadays the hour counts don't lie with longplays or howlongtobeat stats, what other players that beat them will experience quicker.
I literally played games back in PS3/360, and I still am collecting all or most of them for perspective of the trend, I enjoy the games, what they offered in the games as ideas, what can be done/has been done and because I enjoy the mechanics in them not the different game design or themes/otherwise these days of this modern era changes.
That and due to lackluster shooters or many multiplayer ones nowadays not being my thing, so for campaigns, it's actually NORMAL it's just audiences forget.
I focus on game design, no always the themes, set pieces or emotional/other enjoyment so to me I hate a padded campaign but that's usually for ones with mechanics to show off, which Battlefield/COD aren't as much about that more the stories and set pieces as the gunplay or breaches and other stuff happen a lot in the games.
I said this to someone else and pointed the evidence out too. I don't disagree with you or them of the cost but if you look at the evidence, it's already laid out.
@morrisseymuse Besides the return to form, even if I mean, if we compare to say Battlefield 3 or 4 or maybe Bad Company I guess. Maybe the gap with 5 or 1 and 2042. Not sure.
That or it's maybe the 'it was a better time or that's what I experienced back then'. I mean the amount of things people don't get of hour counts, versus remember the memories but don't other details from back then as much.
While as a collector and buying/playing to understand the trends, the themes, the mechanics, a lot of it is clear to me how games were then and are nowadays and what design elements I miss, Indies don't capture (the style, but not the gameplay as much, their skill or budget sure, but not always it's because they can get away with it as it doesn't matter to people, same with how accessible games are these days or more RPG elements or basic movesets, well compared to say any other genres or sci-fi shooters or other ones of PS3/360 I've played that aren't contemporary and COD/Battlefield like, I know I've played /bought most of them so far it's clear how games are now versus then, same with platformers, and racing, and many other genres, trends or not, I prefer good movesets/level design so you bet the skill trees or more basic movesets in some genres bores me to no end, but COD/Battlefield they are continuing with what they were going for all these years, in a way).
Besides that like COD I assume people don't care for sci-fi as much that buy these games they want the more past or contemporary, something 'sigh' grounded or realistic enough.
Same happens with Tom Clancy games, the more realistic or movie like scale. It's why people didn't like Extraction. But then again they had to attach an idea they had for another game so they 'HAD or chose' to use it in Extraction, the goo idea.
Audiences get particular about that. Long running especially or what they originally got into a series for and it's movie/real like identity not it's COD any IPs it can offer skins like Fortnite.
Because we have to have that these days. Some consistency or familiarity is good, other times not. It also limits creativity too. Hmm same as appealing to casuals so it's not too weird. Cough cough current era of gaming and why I find it boring. Mechanically or personality wise (story, world design, etc.)
I'm only generalising but it is easy to pick up on some signs of people, I mean look at sitcoms or dramas or other action stuff, how much some stuff gets by, others don't, because it's close enough to their real lives versus other scales of fiction anymore or if they ever watched them.
That or if it was from their childhood and how much they do or don't expand off things anymore to let new stuff in. That aside.
People experience something, they narrow focus on what they see the series as or what they enjoy. No everyone experiences everything, they don't need to but I mean, it's not hard to see the signs is it if you think hard enough how people are. Their expectations.
Alternate history no clue but I mean if Wolfenstein does well sure but the amount of people that buy those versus what's recognisable with COD/Battlefield/Tom Clancy games I think is enough to make that clear.
The way it plays not sure maybe it's comparable. I haven't played anything newer then 4 so I have no clue yet, but till I get to them.
Maybe the nostalgia? Maybe the messaging? Maybe what it looks like then what it feels like?
So after a rather solid weekend of BF6 playing a bit of the campaign and a lot of multiplayer I can hands on definitely say that most of the issues relating to the campaign are being somewhat exaggerated here. The game is very,very good. It does have some quirks but compared to how call of duty releases this game is performing exceptionally. The que times to get into servers are none existent and take less than a minute and to be honest they were very,very short waiting times on launch day. COD usually takes at least a couple of weeks to become stable. If you love BF then buy it and enjoy it and don't be swayed by the hyperbole surrounding server wait times..
@Northern_munkey Glad you're enjoying matey. I had a blast too and can't wait to get work out of the way today and jump back on 🤣
At launch, it felt like the internet couldn't wait to jump on the BF hate wagon about launch issues, when in reality, the launch in my opinion was impeccable. Sure, there was wait times on launch day, but sheesh! On steam alone, there was over 600k players waiting to jump on the servers.
@WobberleyBob yeah it's awesome buddy.
Not my kind of game but I respect what they have done here ive heard nothing but praise for this game
It’s the maps that are the only thing that’s stopping me from getting. The ones in the beta were flat and uninteresting. Trying to get a friend to jump into the beta and the first map he tried he got hammered. we both sunk over 1000 hours into the flawed 2042 but it at least it had some really fun maps. It concerns me that none of the maps In the BF6 beta had anything memorable happening within them that made me want to tell friends “this is a battlefield map!”.
@Axelay71 I mean, it's Battlefield. The entire hook is the multiplayer.
It's like getting an awesome steak and complaining the side salad was an afterthought.
@OldGamer999 Im playing the campaign and it's not bad so far. It has a summer blockbuster movie vibe to it. I see nothing wrong with the campaign so far. It's like if Michael Bay did a military movie.
@OldGamer999 Don't buy do not support Saudi Arabia and MAGA. My ***** pre-ordered the game a little bit ago out of an impulse buy and thinking the game would actually be good. If I knew that EA would have been purchased I would not have bought the game.
I’m playing the game and I find myself more frustrated than enthused. I’m not trying to be a complainer but the shotgun at ranges from 40 yards out to up close is automatically one shot kill.. I can’t stand responding and being shot as soon as I respond in. lol
Definitely played BF before and was decent with BF BC2 BF 3 and BF4..
I’ve even tried to look up videos to get my settings better.
I’m not trying be a baby but boy it’s frustrating the games I’ve been playing.
Yeah its pretty fantastic and can easily see it lasting me for the rest of the gen. Here's hoping EA don't screw it up.
Beta felt like Battlefield 3/4 in the best era for Battlefield MP and it seemed fairly solid and polished back then - which led me to believe this would be the Best Battlefield for years - but I had concerns they would not match the best Campaign in BF - BF:BC2's campaign is the best.
Still don't know how they intend to finance their long term Post Launch content, that's surely going to be funded by the sales of season passes, cosmetics and other MTX's so that could break BF6
I'll probably buy it on sale at some point - unless they screw up with MTX, or wait for EA Access - there is only so much of Battlefield MP I can play before I get fed up with the game and as the campaign is mediocre, there is no rush to play from my perspective - not at its current price anyway...
@Tasuki Same here. I won't be buying any more EA games, ever. However, I think it would be an interesting discussion to think about how and if the Saudis are going to mandate game content in the future. I don't want to get into the politics of it, because God knows I'm so sick of the same arguments from both sides. But I imagine games like the Sims and Dragon Age will now be out for having gay characters. Split Fiction? Nope, it's woke. Can you imagine a Battlefield mission where you have to save an American citizen from torture from a hostile foreign nation? Is that allowed now? Will they have any effect on the types of narratives that are presented? With this, Tencent, and Ubisoft you have to wonder if this could be another misinformation campaign that they are investing in for the future. We always hear how videogames cause violence, but what if they could be used to affect our thinking by presenting false narratives?
overall I’m happy with it but just feel the amount of maps in mp was very limited in variety and quantity. So therefore a bit repetitive imo. And yea to you older gamers losing your sharp skills with age, I feel you big time. Man is my reaction time terrible lol.
Definitely a future buy for me. I don't mind a short campaign at all - Titanfall 2 is one the best FPSs that I've ever played, and its campaign was insanely short. It was only $12 on Amazon though, so it was well worth it. For a similarly low price, this will be a good get.
@MidnightDragonDX Very honestly absolutely yes. I don’t get at all into multiplayer anymore for years. 5h campaign for £70 is i no for me.
Is there a METRO map?
In a few years time when BF6 has a larger map roster and the Portal has proved itself, this score is irrelevant.
I really don't think that these should be considered and reflected in the final score.
Had a couple of games last night (Rush) which I really enjoyed. Either I suck or the TTK/TTD seems a bit off. I'm sure it's the former.
@zebric21 No, there are 7.
I enjoyed Battlefield 2142 back in the early 2000s. The mechs and future combat was fun. It’s the only one in the series that I have played.
@Propaperpusher soo in one comment you say the game is alright, but then you tell someone not to buy it? For a lot of gamers, if it’s a good game it doesn’t matter who profits. If you can’t enjoy a game because you FEEL it MIGHT enrich your political/ geopolitical opponent, then coloring books may be a better option.
@Steeleye50 "We always hear how videogames cause violence, but what if they could be used to affect our thinking by presenting false narratives?"
This has been happening for years, you just fail to notice when it involves the false narratives you personally favor.
@Troubbble Example please.
Just bought it yesterday, i have no intention of playing it, i just wanna support the saudis.
Does that mean the next good battlefield comes out 10 yrs from now?
Best battlefield in over 10 years is a bold claim.
BF1 came out in 2016 and is often regarded the best in the series along with Bad Company 2, bf 3/4.
@Steeleye25 LOL
@Troubbble So you've got nothing. Typical.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...