
The Until Dawn movie adaptation made its debut in theatres over the weekend, and while its reception has been mixed, an omission in the credits is riling some people up.
Larry Fessenden and Graham Reznick, the pair who wrote the enormous script for the PS4 horror adventure and its branching narrative, are not mentioned in the movie's end credits.
Speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, the writers say they "aren't surprised" about the exclusion, but the way they talk suggests they're not thrilled about it either.
"I didn’t assume anything, but I thought somebody would have bothered to throw in our names, even during the end credits," says Fessenden. "But there's no courtesy in show biz."
Apparently, despite the pair's considerable work on the series, they're not seeking credit, but would've been pleased to see acknowledgement nonetheless.
It appears the issue broadly sits with the Writers Guild of America, which seemingly doesn't have established rules about writing for interactive media.
"In TV and film, the ‘written by’ credit is a very specific term that is part of our union contract with the studios," Says Rob Forman, a member of WGA West Board of Directors. "Unfortunately, in video games, that kind of guarantee and protection doesn’t currently exist, so credit can be more arbitrarily determined by individual game companies."
Kim MacAskill, who is a former narrative director at PlayStation, made a statement on LinkedIn about this topic, showing her disapproval of the snub. In her view, the credits stating "based on the Sony game" is far from sufficient.
"They spent years breaking their brains to make something incredible, and the world deserves to know their names," she writes.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, Fessenden and Reznick "do not have sore feelings" about the Until Dawn movie, but worry that things aren't moving fast enough to ensure other writers are given the credit they deserve.
"I truly think that the guilds are not keeping up with how fast the industry is moving away from traditional media formats," Reznick says.
This has of course sparked debate online about whether those who worked on an original game should be recognised in the credits of its adaptation, which is of course its own project with its own staff and contributors.
Some fans argue that the pair didn't write the film, so it makes sense their names aren't present. Others take the view that the movie wouldn't exist without the beloved game and so a nod to those that made it would be appropriate.
Where do you fall on this? Should the Until Dawn game's writing team get a mention in the Until Dawn movie? Discuss in the comments section below.
[source hollywoodreporter.com, via gamespot.com]





Comments 16
Honestly they’re better off. Stay associated with the game and not this POS.
Hasn't it got like nothing to do with the game apart from the title lol
@StylesT No apparently they do something to actually connect it to the game's lore.
Low you could atleast give them a little credit.
I'm on both sides. Having seen the movie, there's not a single piece of narrative connective tissue between the two. Unlike others, I had a good time with the movie, thought it was okay but not great, and have no problems with its massive divergence, but yeah...there's essentially no similarities.
But I would expect at least a "Special Thanks" shout out, or better yet a "Based on characters created by", seeing as Dr. Hill features prominently and there's a few blink-and-you'll-miss-it references to other characters from the game. Sure, the studio didn't necessarily do anything wrong by not mentioning them, but it's not a great look either.
I get it but the film is an adaption in name only. The story is completely different from the games and an original story by the films writers. Take away the IP name and no one would think it was based on the game. So yeah why should they be credited? They had no input on the film and films story is an original story.
Oh no! Anyway.
(This comment is not too short it has the perfect number of words. Push Square pushing its garrulous bias 😉)
They should be given due credit, they started the story, it's been adapted from their work.
I understand why they didn't have them included in the "written by" section or similarly "writers". But you'd have thought they could have been thrown in the "with special thanks to" section, even as a small gesture.
I am not particularly interested in this Until Dawn movie. I just do not see the point in it. The interactive experience, the player’s decisions, are what actually matter.
Why bother making a mediocre movie, based upon a clever game? A game that was openly influenced by far better movies.
But I agree entirely, that not giving credit to the original creators of the work is awful. Is it a money issue? Royalties?
But this happens a lot in Hollywood, doesn’t it? How many films are remakes of previous work, and do not acknowledge the original writers?
For instance, did Martin Scorsese and William Monahan credit the writers of Infernal Affairs, when they wrote The Departed?
The movie is a completely different story, why would they get a credit or anything, it's just a new entry in the franchise as a whole. They seem entitled. Let's be honest it's not like the game was super original anyway.
This is an oft recurring theme with Hollywood.
They are so bereft of talent they just keep taking other creatives ideas and
" making it in their image" and 99.9% of the time it's terrible to the point of heresy.
Gods I can't stand this new class of creatives( boy if that's not an oxymoron)
Personally, I don't think they should have credits. They are not apart of the movie. They are writers for the game itself. Now if they actually did any work on the movie itself, then sure, include them.
"Give credit where it's due" is true, but they are not due any credit for a project they are not involved in. Just being based off of the game itself is not enough reason for it.
They worked for a corporation and the corporation gets the credit, get over it.
@GirlVersusGame @Flaming_Kaiser @Bingbongboyo They do get credit, just not by individual name, The credits say it is inspired by Until Dawn by Supermassive Games or words to that effect.
The trouble is that the game writers aren't the only ones who created those characters, it's a teamwide collaborative effort of back and forth between writers, designers and other departments that end up shaping the final characters, their look, their words and their actions. Should we credit them all by name? (Game credits can be over half an hour long)
Frankly I think we should either credit all of them by name, or just keep it as "Supermassive games", why should writers be singled out?
If this movie was based on a novel called "Until Dawn", the author of the book would be in the credits.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...