Update: Following the leak earlier today, DICE has officially unveiled Battlefield 2042 with an announcement trailer. The gameplay reveal will take place on 13th June 2021. Check it out above, with extra information and screenshots available below.
The game will not have a singleplayer campaign, and neither will there be a Battle Royale mode. On PS5, online bouts will feature 128 players. On PS4, the number is reduced by half to 64. The maps themselves will also be smaller on last-gen consoles. It will cost $60 on PS4 and $70 on PS5. In order to qualify for an upgrade from the PS4 version to PS5, you must purchase the more expensive Gold Edition.
On the topic of the game lacking a campaign and Battle Royale mode, design director Daniel Berlin told Eurogamer: "I think that's just something that enables us to really lean into what we are best at. If you look at the DNA of the studio, what we've been doing for so long, we just said you know what, we're not going to have a traditional single-player campaign this time around, but we're going to put all that emphasis and all those resources into building depth into the multiplayer. Because that is what we do best."
Original story: After months of waiting, the next entry in the Battlefield franchise has leaked in its entirety hours before the reveal trailer is set to drop. It is called Battlefield 2042, and will launch for both PlayStation 5 and PS4 on 22nd October 2021. The game heads to the near future, the year 2042 to be precise. That is if the title didn't already give it away. Key art for the title and screenshots are viewable below.
The leak comes via Reddit, with the site sharing details that were uploaded to the Origin website ahead of time. A description of Battlefield 2042 is as follows: "U.S.A. and Russia stand at the brink of war. Proxy wars have waged for decades, generating experienced but displaced combat veterans. These Specialists use their skills to shape the future — a future worth fighting for."
It will have seven new maps that support up to 128 players, from "Seoul’s cities to Egypt’s deserts, every map offers a unique experience based on the natural environment". A new Specialist system allows you to pick from four different classes, each with its own Specialty and Trait, while weapons, vehicles, and gadgets are all fully customisable. You can even "summon a robotic dog built for battle, employ a grappling hook or don your very own wingsuit".
There will be an open beta, a Year 1 Pass complete with Battle Passes, and three editions to choose from: Standard, Gold, and Ultimate. While the information isn't confirmed at the time of writing, the leak absolutely looks legit, with high-resolution screenshots and all. We think it's very safe to say this is all the real deal. We'll update this article once the reveal trailer drops later today too.
What do you make of all this information? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
[source reddit.com]
Comments 91
This all looks and sounds very cool! Can't wait.
Hard pass 👎
FPS that are multiplayer oriented are basic, repetitive by nature and design and just as boring as batshi t
I usually don't play multiplayer FPS, but this one looks absolutely gorgeous!
I might even pick it up.
Of course it is a war with Russia. Never mind China is a much bigger threat. China owns American corpos so we can't have that. Them again Russia is allegedly responsible for Last Jedi getting Metabombed so why not go to war with them?
That may be the most original cover art I've ever seen!!!
Seriously though been playing a few of the games in the franchise for the first time lately and curious to see how this on is. Hopefully has a great campaign!
It's called 2042 b/c that's when they expect enough people to own next gen consoles to have 128 online players. 😂
Cool! I'm not a fan of COD but really got into BF with BF Bad Company and love destroying buildings with enemies hiding in them on online multiplayer. Fingers crossed the series is still fun to play online and offline!
Sounds cool but I get less and less excited for cross-gen games everyday...
Anyway, I wish they had the balls to let us play as both USA and Russia in the singleplayer, but I doubt that
Those shots look amazing. Hopefully they are screen shots not bull shots and the other elements like gameplay are equally impressive.
YESS!!! Lets go! a futuristic battlefield!
Man , I can't believe im excited about a BATTLEFIELD game because , i'm usually a COD person ; but COD's been ''meh'' for so long and , BF's been M.I.A for awhile so , I'm actually glad about this .
@Solidocelot Yeah, it’s all one massive conspiracy. DICE are colluding with Hunter Biden and everything.
Sure looks pretty but none of the Battlefields I tried clicked with me for some reason (I did enjoy Battlefront though).
Looks great, but until the Cronus Zen and similar devices are outright banned I won’t touch online shooters anymore.
No mention of a campaign is more than telling and 7 maps seems a bit small but I’m only in it for campaign so not sure how many maps games like this usually have.
Robotic dog and wing suit? I read that and the internal sigh was audible.
@ElMarko have you ever even played a Battlefield game?
Because it comes across like you’re hating on something you know naff all about 🤷🏻♂️
@ScottyG Yeah anyone go watch Maxiq on YouTube play BF5, top ranked player who is full of complete BS and should be the face of Cronus Zen.Most players do play legit so I can still enjoy the BF games but to die to obvious cheaters does make me question why I play just to get my blood pressure up.
Can't wait!!!!
Looks awesome so far....oddly enough mostly sceptical about the size of the player count and size of the maps.
Larger maps sound awesome, and imagine that due to the size of them they'd feel like multiple maps depending where you are fighting within them...just hope the density, detail and destruction capability on the maps isn't sacrificed for that higher player count. But lets see!
Leaks point towards extra emphasis on "team/squad play" so curious to see if that is true. Really liked the squad points on BFV to unlock perks - although did think in practice it was quite pointless. V2 rocket was cool but rest were underwhelming.
Been playing a lot of BFV lately but more often than not dipping back into BF4...really happy with the setting of this new one! Jets, helicopters...Wonder if the vehicles now like jets will have cool second seta options like the helicopters?
Too much hype!
@Jacko11 just 1, 4 and 5
So its just multiplayer? I enjoyed 5 and Ones MP but i always enjoyed the campaigns. Hopefully they will be single player although after 5 im not surprised they went MP only. 5s campaign was very short and it released without the last chapter
Official reveal was supposed to be happening now but turns out it's just a countdown and it's actually in an hour lol
@Voltan That’s a d*** move.
@Voltan
Haha I know right! Thought it was going to be a short vid or something to set the scene...like fake news broadcasts or something.
Instead, after a couple mins of glitchy action just the countdown.
Should have thrown in a Rick Roll
Robot dogs, wing suits and grappling hooks? How do you do fellow kids?
@Diani_beachboy Far Cry pulled the same thing except they had a countdown to start the stream, followed by a generic 2-minute YouTube countdown and then another 30-minut (iirc) countdown lol.
@ElMarko Bruh, do you not have anything better to do other than come in an article about something you clearly don't like, and talk trash about it?
Battlefield shawn kemp and vin baker.this battlefield should be interesting.word up son
@Daveuppercut I thought the same 😂
Wingsuit aside, they were in Necromunda and that released like last week.
It's funny how these humongous AAA franchises like Battlefield are too big to fail or even risk, so what do they do? Poach everything from every other game under the sun.
I'm not saying pulling ideas from other games is wrong, the contrary, but the methodical way in which trends have been employed these last few years makes a lot of AAA games look bland and all alike to me.
At least we got id and DOOM keeping the old school alive 🤩
Why damn future.
I hope they will not make it sci fi over the top.
@redd214 haha it's terrible isn't it. As if their MO was to have the game blend in to every other shooter like wallpaper.
Cover art aside though, dead excited for this one!
Updated with the trailer and screenshots!
I don't know what I was expecting. It's just more braindead war FPS action. Snore-fest.
Never was a fan of the online in Battlefield games but the Single Player has always impressed me and this game is no different.
I hope it's this robot dog
Why is there a quad bike on the top of a narrow skyscraper??
Would of been good to see just a little bit of gameplay. Trailer felt about 4 minutes too long.
No BR mode? Was really hoping for this to be the game that killed Warzone....
@Arugula what looked incredible? There's no gameplay
@Stocksy Same. Hope this game gets Single Player otherwise I'm not that interested. Still though that doesn't mean I won't consider giving it a shot at some point, I'll always prefer Single Player.
It’s €70 for both the PS4 & PS5 versions on the Irish store.
Really like BF, but I can’t really see myself spending €70 on a game with only MP.
WTF ?!! what was that trailer? how many man-hours have been spent doing that... I guess nothing from the trailer is actual gameplay so it has nothing to do with the game itself. What a waste of resources.
@General_Spiller How else are they gonna take out the helicopters?!
$70 on series x 😅
No single player or battle Royale? So half the content from the last game gone? I fully expect this game to be cheaper then
Just read about the lack of a campaign. Def a bummer there. Will play it when it eventually comes to one of the sub services next year some time :/
@General_Spiller The trailer was taking aspect from online matches that you normal see players do like 'jumping out of a fighter jet and blowing up the other fighter jet with the rocket'. So knowing gamers... Some one was probably too lazy to walk up the flight of stairs, so they rode the quad bike up which ends up being harder to do then just walking up the stairs.
No campaign story means a hard pass.
$70 for less content then previous games or the competition, if there ever was a time to not raise the price it would be now that you're selling half a game
7 maps for a full price game will wait a year and get EA play
in-engine footage but impossible to draw any conclusions from this, so yeah, great...
I've already lost interest...
@UltimateOtaku91 agreed. unfortunately, this will cost 70USD with 50% less content. yet people are happy about this announcement. welcome to hype machine culture, where people cannot form their own opinions anymore and just go along for the ride
@ElMarko and not to mention, cash grabs and ridden with lifeless cheaters.
No battle royal no buy.
Gold an ultimate editions come with a year 1 pass so i take it from that the dlc maps wont be free like they were in battlefield V
Looking at EA's official pre-order price links the UK prices for the standard edition are:
These prices are absurd for a multiplayer only game and even worse for console owners who have to pay for PS+/Xbox Live just to play the game.
EA have also hinted at cross-play, making the console pricing all the more laughable when PC players get everything the current gen consoles offer (128 players, 4K, 60+fps, RT) and now potentially the entire console playerbase without the paywall to play online.
I downloaded Battlefield V from Plus and have enjoyed it. Weirdly I started off with the single player campaign but struggles so thought I'd hone my skills in the MP and haven't returned to the SP campaign since. I'll provide give them all a try at some point but the MP scratches my itch well enough.
More players is good, there are some really big open maps in V but they kind of feel empty, almost like there are only a dozen soldiers on each side fighting a key battle from WWII. Some maps condense the action and are better for it.
I'm hoping they're working on Battlefront 3 but maybe they're reliant on Disney producing more new Star Wars content. Might be a while then!
Wow. Seems like this will have less content than Star Wars: Squadrons, which EA only charged $40 for.
And yet, they freaking want $70 for this crap?!
@truerbluer Would you say the same thing about a single player only game? Why is it that if a game is just multiplayer, you don't think it justifies full price despite the fact you're likely to spend more time playing it than the average campaign?
@truerbluer this is the way gaming has been headed for a while just pure greed
@LiamCroft no internet connection - can't play it , once the servers get shut down it's useless , have to pay a subscription on console to play it
That would have made a great trailer for a co-op story campaign.
Maybe next time.
@RubyCarbuncle Wow, they just confirmed no single player. Baffling.
I wonder if the same people complaining that Sony charging £69.99 for the new games will have anything to say about this game. The Ultimate Edition (the one you need to get if you want all of the 1st year of content) is £110. You'll be expected to drop further coin after the first year and all the goods skins that they don't put in the battle passes.
The small size and no single player screams they are planning to hide remaining content behind DLC paywalls.
Hard pass. Honestly I was really wowed by battlefield games initially, but they have become repetitive garbage designed to create recurring revenue through addiction, riddled with cheaters that remain un addressed on a meaningful scale.
Is this going to be full price?!
They ruined a potential comeback in every conceivable way tbh
@LiamCroft I personally can never justify paying the same or greater price than a single player game because a multiplayer-only game's lifespan is entirely reliant on the number of people playing, which will eventually decline over time. If you look at the most popular multiplayer-only games today you'll see they're largely free-to-play (Fortnite, Warzone, Apex Legends) or annual sports games that have traditional single player modes.
Once the game population dies down you're left with an expensive paperweight with little resale value (even worse if you go digital). I suppose those that only buy 2-3 games a year and devote their time solely to those few games can probably justify the price but personally I can't justify spending that much money on something that has a guaranteed limited lifespan.
@KundaliniRising333 Ahh that is a shame. Oh well I guess I'll wait for a Sale then because to me a multiplayer game isn't worth it at full price considering the fact they have expiration dates.
@truerbluer That's fine, that suits the sort of games you're into playing. But having that single player story campaign tacked on (which is how it's been for Battlefield games for many entries now) is going to add maybe an evening's worth of playtime to your purchase. Would you want to endlessly replay a Battlefield campaign just to feel like you've got your money's worth?
@LiamCroft I'm fine with them not including a campaign, it has never been the draw or strength of the series anyway. They simply haven't justified to me why the price has increased by £10 when there's seemingly less content than the previous game. For me I just find the price to content ratio lopsided.
I understand that MP is their strong point but this looks like garbage. I've enjoyed every BF up until now. Wait for the microtransactions, loot boxes and other greed.
@JechtUltima BF4 featured China as an antagonist faction in the campaign, and as a result, the game was not sold in China. I wouldn't put it past EA to tailor the story in a way that doesn't cut out large chunks of profit.
128 players? Hell yeah, can't wait to pick this up.
No thanks. F*ck EA.
I think this looks awful. It’s been a while since I played Battlefield, but I thought one of the strong points of the series was that it is somewhat more realistic than the rest? Let’s just dive between parachuters with my wing suit, jump out of my billion dollar fighter jet to shoot another plane with a rocket launcher, and let loose my robotic dog cannon.
And, while no bearing on gameplay, why are all the soldiers in the trailer so «passive» looking? How light are the guns and equipment in 2042? When you go down a corridor with guns ready, you are really focused and keep your gun steady, ready to down the enemy - you don’t stroll along like you’re on your way to the beach for some serious relaxing (see 1:10 onwards, for instance). Most soldiers just looking around waiting for the enemy chopter to get the guns ready.
I mean, the trailer was as Battlefield as it gets BUT, need some gameplay with it too... you can show us all these crazy effects in cinematic but means 0 without real gameplay look.
No Battle Royal??? Day one.😁😁
Well that is a very bombastic trailer. Used to play loads of Bad Company 1, 2 and Battlefield 3, 4. Did have a go at 1 and V but couldn't get into them and hardly touched the single player campaigns.
Day one baby!!!!
Can't wait for it.
YES super storms!
No campaign mode, no purchase from me. Shame, looks decent as well☹
why oh why,,, BF1 and BF5 had good single player.
70 quid for an mp only game...nah
@Sinton the jumping out of Jet to shoot the Jet is an Easter Egg. I remember someone doing in on BF4 I think. It's a tribute to an amazing play by a gamer.
You're being too literal, this is just a reveal trailer, you'll see more in the Gameplay Trailer on 13th June.
Battlefield is just more realistic than CoD not a realistic shooter.
@Solidocelot Oh boo hoo hoo American it must suck ass when capitalism doesn't always work in your favour eh? Agreed about Russia being a stale enemy though, and besides they are our friends so I don't wanna fight them even in video games.
Online multiplayer games are by design money oriented. It’s the video game industry way to interpret John Warrillow and all this subscription mania all over the world. I just want to play games on my couch against my computer or my console like in the old days.
I wanted current-day or near-future. But I also wanted a campaign.
Online-only and multiple battle passes per year means I'm 100% out.
Far Cry 6 is looking far more attractive, as is Six Days in Fallujah. And I know Guerrilla have moved on, but I'd love another Killzone. Too few single-player FPS games these days.
Bit gutted no campaign but if the multi player is back to bf3 and bf4 with those only in battlefield moments I'll probably get it. Always think the price and value of multi player only games is subjective. Me and my friends put hundreds of hours into bf3&4 online.
Going to need to know them DualSense and 3D Audio features asap. Don’t be lazy on those. I don't care if MS has the marketing rights, no excuses on doing a half assed job. Take advantage of the PS5's features.
I still don't know how people can still be excited with CG trailers. This showed nothing about the game...
They must be insane if they think I'll buying half a game with microtransactions for £70, I wait to pick it up once it's dropped in price.
Tap here to load 91 comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...