
Everyone expected it to be Rockstar and GTA 6 to drive up the prices of games yet again, but in an unexpected twist, it’s Nintendo that’s taken the plunge.
In case you missed the news, Mario Kart World will retail for $79.99. In fact, so will the Nintendo Switch 2 Editions of Super Mario Party Jamboree and Kirby and the Forgotten Lands – although there will be upgrade paths for existing owners.
If you’re in Europe, you’re looking at even higher prices, with the physical versions of select games rising as high as €89.99 (~$98). And this, we hasten to add, is all prior to any impending economic issues caused by the introduction of US tariffs.
Subscribe to Push Square on YouTube166k
While we’ll allow our colleagues at Nintendo Life to dig into the details of what all this means specifically for the Switch 2, there are wider industry repercussions at play here.

If Nintendo is successful and sells another 67 million copies of Mario Kart World at $79.99 over the course of the generation, every other publisher, including Sony, will follow.
And that’s going to price a lot of people out.
Now, we understand there’s genuine economic context at play here. Inflation, for example, means games have generally gotten cheaper over time, as the $59.99 you paid for a PS4 game in 2013 would cost about $82.17 today. But this doesn’t take into account the stagnation of salaries over the same period.
Of course, we also appreciate games are getting increasingly expensive to make. Ex-PS Studios boss Shuhei Yoshida recently talked at length about how all of Sony’s oft-criticised remasters are required to balance out its spiralling development budgets.

But none of this makes the pill any easier to swallow.
Many people point out that games in the Super Nintendo era could cost upwards of $100, but that’s a different situation because they were often distributed on expensive cartridges, some of which included additional hardware inside. That’s simply not the case in this era of games.
There’s also an argument that games offer considerably more “bang for your buck” than other forms of entertainment, like a movie ticket. But while true, it feels like many consumers are already aware of that reality, with box office sales tumbling over the past few years.
And this is all while the industry has been quietly trying to push up prices, offering premium Early Access in an attempt to extract more dollars through FOMO. But now Nintendo’s potentially given publishers an excuse to push up the base prices as well, while they can still sprinkle expensive Deluxe Editions on top.

Our view is that the push to drive up prices is only going to trigger more industry turmoil. If we are truly entering an era of $79.99 software, then you’re going to see consumers become even more selective, and that means even fewer titles will succeed.
It’s worth noting that games don’t release in a vacuum. Free-to-play evergreens like Fortnite and Genshin Impact are taking up an increasingly large piece of the pie, and there’s an audience of players who’d rather spend their money there than on the next big budget release.
So, there are publishers who’ll be happy with Nintendo’s announcement; the higher-ups at Take-Two will likely be slapping each other on the back today as they line up GTA 6’s price. No longer will they be the ones to take the heat.
But where does it all end? We follow the financials of many of these publishers, and most of them are posting record profits, in spite of the challenging economic environments they face.
Gaming is already an expensive luxury – but at what point does it simply begin to price you out?
What are your thoughts on $80 games? Do you think they represent reasonable value for the amount of entertainment they offer in return? Or does it cross a mental and financial barrier for you? Let us know in the comments section below.
Are you willing to pay $80 for new games? (1,740 votes)
- Yes, I don't have a problem with it at all
- I'll only pay it for select titles, and grudgingly
- Meh, I'll just wait for discounts
- Nah, there's no way I'll ever pay that much





Comments 156
People will respond just as they did with £70; they will either continue to buy at full price, or continue to wait for a sale. If people want the game badly enough, they'll pay top dollar. If they can wait, they will. I don't see much change with an individuals behaviour if prices go up still further, and after a while, we will just accept it as the norm...
I don't care how much they cost. I'll always wait for a decent price cut, unless they're cheap to begin with (e.g. most PSVR2 games). Patience is a virtue that most people, unfortunately, lack.
With the price ever growing, this will just lead to people being more selective of the games they purchase.
So rather than buying all the wanted games on release, people will end up waiting for sales until they reach a price that matches their willingness to pay. I see this myself in my game choices, where as i would buy all games i wanted on release, I am now waiting until there is a sale and the game reaches a price I am willing to pay.
A game like GTA won't have to worry about this as it will be bought regardless but if smaller studios or AA games do this, they may see a decline in the number of sales they will achieve.
just my two cents
In general I’d like to see tiered pricing, with more games exploring the middle ground. The huge big budget titles like GTA can be at the highest pricing, but smaller projects shouldn’t be charging the same prices.
Fortunately the AA and indie space still has lower priced releases (games like Split Fiction and Clair Obscur recently, or Balatro, Vampire Survivors, etc) to fill the void. But the problem is when AAA studios churn out garbage or some iterative annual update that should be DLC and then ask for premium pricing.
@Aussiemike90 This is how I see it too. Weirdly, there are arguably too many games these days, and not enough time and money to go around to all of them.
So, like you say, people will be more selective. It means a handful of the biggest games will make more money than ever before, while others will simply fail.
I'm lucky in that my brother has my account on his PS5 also, so if we both want the same game I get and we go halfers on it. But if a game that only I want is at £80, good f'ing luck prying it from my fingers
I think Nintendo just screwed all of us even more.
They've just set a precedent for other companies to do the exact same.
I will wait for sales and hope most people do the same.
AAA games have been failing left and right and one of the reasons is the unwillingness to pay £70 for a game when some cost £30.
I think this will put even more pressure into the quality and scope of AAA games and even more will fail like Veilguard did.
It might be a crazy prediction, but I think a lot of big publishers/developers will shut down due to the increased pressure and a lot of smaller developers will thrive by offering a solid game at a cheaper price.
Something tells me people will be willing to pay any amount for first party Nintendo games like Mario, Zelda, and Pokemon, but not for third party games.
The 2nd hand market is sure to look a lot more attractive, if the price of games goes up higher. But who's going to buy them in the first place, to trade them in? Some of last year's biggest releases, I've still yet to play, because they're all in the £50 region. I will simply wait, and spend my money on cheaper alternatives.
The problem with waiting for a Nintendo game to drop in price is that you'll die first.
Wait for a sale.
130$ cad after taxes is a hard no
My ability to resist FOMO is legendary. I'll play your game eventually, but it won't be for £80 I can promise you that.
No change for me; I'll continue to wait 6-12 months after release and buy the fully patched version for 60-80% off.
BTW, isn't "meh, I'll just wait for discounts" and there's no way I'll ever pay rather much" basically the same question?
I won't take chances on buying games I am not 100% sold on.
I have taken chances on a lot of games in the past. Sometimes I get a pleasant surprise and sometimes disappointment. It's starting to get to a point that the gamble wouldn't be worth the loss if it doesn't click
So in my case it will be less day one purchases for sure and more waiting on sales to try things out.
Gamepass for Xbox looks a good option too with it's day one releases. If PS Plus did that I might be more inclined to sub at ultimate as that would certainly be a clear incentive to do so.
Same as it currently is with £70 games, but it will just make me even MORE selective about what I buy Day 1.
I already buy very little day 1. This isn't just due to pricing, it's because most games simply aren't finished day 1. Often new modes, better performance, bug fixes and other QoL features are added months after release. Plus DLC later which i'd rather play all at once if interested. It comes down to a simple question.
Why would I pay the most money for the worst version of the game?
Therefore i'd rather wait a 6-12+ months to play most games. The fact they are half the price by then is just the bonus.
And then companies are surprise they don't reach their imagined sales figures hmmmm and then they implode🤷♂️ the stupidity sometimes is unbelievable
It’s not good for the industry I feel, it will lead to revenue being redistributed away from smaller games towards the behemoth releases. That would make it even harder to survive on the fringes or with second tier games.
Who’s funding the Alan Wakes and Ico’s in that industry?
no game in the world is worth $80
@Splat it’s consumers fault
The only full priced games I buy are €20 indies that I really want. PS plus extra usually has everything I need.
I won't support Nintendo on this, hopefully the Switch 2 sales will suffer because of it.
Nintendo has always been a company that thrives when it's struggling imo, they always seem to mess things up after a huge succes.
I rarely buy games on release so it doesn't affect me either way.
Companies can charge what they like for games. I've got something like 40+ high quality games on my wishlist. I can wait and I'll buy it at a price I feel is good for me.
Doesn't affect me that much, since I always wait for deep discounts and have a seemingly never-ending backlog anyway.
I'm not bothered about £75 games, really. There's loads of games where if you looked at how much I got out of them they'd be worth way more than that. I got Cyberpunk 2077 for £12 and I got the DLC free. I've played it four times. I've spent hundreds of hours with it. It's a disgrace I got it so cheap. I should be able to buy it again because I feel so bad about it.
It's all about value. Would I buy Mario Kart World for £75? Absolutely not. Because I'm not going to sit and play Mario Kart for more than five or ten hours. It ain't happening. I'm 40. I'm not sitting and playing Mario Kart with friends. I'm gaming in my pyjamas and talking to my cat.
But a GTA VI? Sure. I can see the value. A Witcher 4? I can see the value in that. Honestly, if you told me The Witcher 4 was £100 I could make a case for it because I know how many hours I spent - and loved - with The Witcher 3. Different games have different value to me and so it's a case by case basis.
As said above, I'll be extremely selective with day 1's
I would say this is Sony's chance to one up Nintendo (I know this is cope) and keep the price of games £70.
@Aussiemike90 Totally agree, I’ll buy Doom and GTA6 day one as I really want them, but games like Atom Fall I’ve not and will wait for a discount. I used to be more trigger happy and buy more day one but it’s a more expensive hobby now. Smaller games like Shinobi and that T2 retro game if they are around the 20 mark I’ll still probably be more inclined to pick up day one but the bigger games I’m more hesitant these days
Nintendo really went there didn’t they lol! Did not see it coming with the Switch 2!
I already rarely pay full price for games. Last game I paid full price is Outlaws. Wish I’d waited. But I learned my lesson.
@LordFunkalot Nintendo knows it doesn’t matter for them. People will pay.
Does anyone remember when Sony tried to charge 60 USD for psivta games? Consumers weren't having it, so they quickly lowered the price to be more aligned with what psv owners were willing to pay for a new game.
@AhmadSumadi Never a truer post typed
Nope I'm not paying for a 80$ game.but Playstation games goes on sale fast not so much on Nintendo side.word up son
I buy maybe 1 full price game a year. I don't have the time to jump to a new game straight away so usually when I finally have the time or feeling like playing a certain title, I can pick it up physically new for 20 euro.
A game like Ghost of Yotei though I will be buying DAY ONE =D
@ChrisDeku Possibly. Though if AAA games are going to be £80 that leaves a large window of pricing options for smaller AA and Indie titles. It could be seen as an opportunity for them.
I would pay it for a few selective titles like GTA6, but im already doing that now and the amount of games i would buy would only become less than i do now. It would be buying more titles in sale or just wait till they hit PS Plus Extra and not buy them at all.
Personally? Up to $100 it doesn't affect me since I usually buy one D1 release per quarter and wait for a 35%+ discount on anything else.
But it might affect those that buy more than one newly released game per quarter or even more than one per month.
While I can see why companies need to hike the prices, like, for real we oughta be paying close to $120 according to the last report I saw on development costs x inflation rate since the 90's, I can also see that there is no market for that kind of price because its not benefical for consumers.
Just call me Mr sales, or 2nd hand, but games aren't that good, the best ones make their money back, the bad ones I don't buy. Bring back Codemaster copies at £1.99 a cassette.
The thing is when looking at inflation games have actually got cheaper as time has gone on. In the 80s and 90s we were paying £50-£60 for cartridge based games with a lot less content and much smaller development costs. So actually prices of games now are actually a bit of a bargin.
@johncalmc Yeah, this is why I advocate for a better tiering to game prices. The enjoyment per hour metric should roughly align with the cost. It is a slippery slope however because game length is really only one component of the value. Otherwise we might see even more bloating and filler content being put into otherwise good games just so the producer can charge $80 instead of $60.
But yeah, the Baldur’s Gate 3, Elden Ring, Witcher, Cyberpunk, KCD2, GTA, etc type of games that ooze production cost and dozens and dozens of hours of quality content should not necessarily feel obliged to sell at $60 like an Atomfall, for example.
Between games getting bigger and PS+ Premium, Epic, Prime Gaming and an extensive back catalogue I rarely ever buy Day 1 and at £80 it would just reinforce waiting for sales. I also only tend to play 1 game at a time on a platform, and only buy 1 or 2 games to have waiting in the wings. That way games just get cheaper or can land on sub services by the time you are ready to play them.
Given how many people wait for sales its shows how ridiculous the current trend is where we judge a games success or failure after only 7 days.
Even at $80 new that’s cheaper than when I was a kid. I am fine with it. Will continue my current habits. Games I am excited about I will buy full price and games I am interested in I will buy later on sale. Unless I’m bored and then I will buy them earlier.
I have paid £80 for a game before, that was when I was a kickstarter backer for Pillars of Eternity (and £80 back then was more than it is now due to inflation). I didn't regret paying that much for this extremely not AAA game because the amount of enjoyment I got from that game was worth it. That's what determines how much I'm willing to pay for game- how much fun I think I'll get from it.
So, yeah, if the game really, really appeals to me on a "need to play this ASAP" level, I'll pay £80 for it. But games like that only come out once or twice in an entire console generation.
Perfectly fine with me. That’s hardly any inflation in 25 years time.
I figure prices would go up. I figure gta 6 would be the one. But not Nintendo games. They don't even push the boundary nor the industry forward. Ps4 tech games should not cost more than current prices.
The problem in case of Nintendo isn't 80$ games. It's 80$ games when you consider fact that Nintendo games never goes on sale.
Like. Ubisoft can charge whatever they want at release, because I know that few months later I would be able to buy their game for 50% less at worst.
But honestly I like that they are charging more for physical games. That should be a standard long ago. If you have less expenses for creating digital game then you have for physical it should be reflected in price.
No game will ever be worth 80 bucks. Dont let yourself get f… by these companies
@Splat where do you live? Here in germany, nintendos games are on sale a ton. And im talking every game. They even do 3 for the price of 2 sales and ao on. This notion that nintendo products dont drop in price is not a reality in europe at least
@Frmknst Lol, wait.. what are the other two levels? 😂
Honestly, it is what it is. I remember buying SNES games for up to £50 in the early 90's ( well, my parents buying me them anyway, usually just birthday or Xmas ), so it really comes down to how much you want it and how big your games budget is.
As someone now who has a mortgage, a partner, growing bills, and a host of other financial responsibilites and aims, I have a tough time justifying a £60 game which I can get for half that price a year later, or even less down the line. But that's just me.
Obviously not happy to see it but I was expecting $80 to be the standard going into this generation so I'm not too bothered. It is getting to the point where I will have to be much more selective on what I buy at full price though.
Especially with Nintendo games in particular. I'm shocked they were the first to do this considering they usually don't bother with motion-capture, cutscene direction, VO, etc. Most of their games are strictly in the for fun only category. They aren't putting out narrative heavy games that require all that stuff so I am a bit surprised they went above $70 first.
It's a no from me.
Sale or eBay.
New games are already too expensive. I very rarely buy a game on launch these days. Here in Brazil specially. So, NO.
I foolishly bought the digital version of Starfield for £100, enamoured by the promise of early play, an open world space adventure, and my love of Skyrim. Never again. The game is mediocre and I can't even resell to recoup some of that money. At least with expense physical version you can always hit eBay or CEX at a later date.
@Th3solution I should clarify, when I say value I don't just mean hours played even though that was the only example I gave. Value isn't just time spent to me. Ten hours spent wonderfully is a better value proposition to me then sixty hours in which half of it is tedious busywork.
So I would pay more for The Last of Us Part II, for example. I relatively short game but one that I think is the best at what it does. I'd pay a lot more for What Remains of Edith Finch than whatever it costs.
I agree companies should be exploring the spectrum of pricing more. It's ridiculous that we just decided AAA games cost £70 and that's that. Some games are simply worth more than others and if you've made The Witcher 4 and you're confident in it and you think you can sell it for more, then I say sell it for more.
I wait for sales on 40 dollar games and 30 dollars many times. Nintendo never has sales either I'm good
I think it’s common for a lot of gamers to wait a couple months for things to be patched, and if the price goes down there’s no hurry. It’s important we keep pushing for physical releases, when it goes all digital we’ll see fewer price drops I imagine.
But £80 is too much for a lot of people, £70 is a lot, it has been great for the popularity of indies though!
No thanks, but I'm not worried about it since I can wait for a discount, I worried about nintendo games because their games rarely discounted 😞
I guess my answer is "I'll wait for a discount" for 3rd party games, and for a very small set of games, "I'll only pay it for select titles, and grudgingly".
New 3D mario, donkey kong, mario kart world, elden ring 2, and maybe final fantasy 17 if it's good, yeah I'll pay $80, but for others I'll wait for a discount.
Well even nintendo is pushing for all digital. I’ll just have ti start holding off on day one purchases all around. Most western devs already not making stuff of any interest. Its most egregious as nintendos games are so cheap to make and dont need the price hike
The problem is that people will pay $100 for GTA 6. They will pay $80 for Zelda and Mario. Publishers know that they have titles that people will complain yet buy anyway. Meanwhile, they can release smaller titles with current price to sort of justify the $80 price as an added value. There is no escape here.
And for Nintendo fans, it’s even worse since Nintendo never ever cut the price of their games. You can bet that Switch 1 games will increase their price in the future.
@johncalmc Oh yeah, I figured that’s what you meant. But game length is a factor, no doubt. But also the quality of the experience during that time in the game. Totally agree.
Of course the poster child for the opposite of large bloated games that don’t justify their cost is The Order 1886, a game with high production-per-square-inch but only lasted 8 hrs so when it launched at $60 at the same price as Witcher 3, Fallout 4, and Bloodborne that year, it was DOA. I bought it for $10 and loved the game. If it would have launched at $30 maybe we’d be getting a sequel and the legacy of the game and of Ready at Dawn would have been different.
It just surprises me that executives who are obviously a lot smarter than me don’t know how to better calculate a good price point for their games. 😄
lol. I mean what is there to say? No one likes paying more.
I actually wonder if the price hike in AAA will benefit indie more. People might not want/be able to afford £80 on a game but a couple of £20 games in a similar genre might suddenly be a lot more appealing.
I paid £69.99 for Virtua Racing on the Megadrive with the SVP chip years ago, but the big difference nowadays is the sheer wealth of titles begging for our attention. Its so much easier to wait for heavy discounts or buy an indie at a reasonable price, as most of our backlogs are rediculous in the first place.
>Inflation, for example, means games have generally gotten cheaper over time
Try living in a country where video games permanently go up in price every year.
Microtransactions and all other BS would have to be gone. Than sure, why not.
My thoughts on it are a combination of answers from the poll above - I’ll only pay it for a very few select titles and grudgingly at that but I’ll typically do what I already do now and just wait for sales and discounts.
As hobbies go, gaming (especially on a console) is really cheap and offers great bang for your buck, even at £80. It does seem a lot of money to charge for a game though, especially when you see the same software a few years old on sale at under £7…
I would spend £80 on a game, but it would just make me a lot choosier and I would be much more inclined to wait for stuff to go on sale, as I already have been after other recent increases.
I still can’t call it an expensive hobby though… I cycle as well, now THAT is an expensive hobby 😵💫
I've been getting more selective about which games I buy at launch. Further price rises will just increase that, and I'll be waiting for the sales more often.
I've had most consoles in my life starting with Intellivision (I'm old!). I think this is where I jump off the boat, $80-$90 is completely ridiculous for a single game, especially when you know they are still going to microtransaction the hell out of everything and still charge extra for DLC. It's out of control. Thank God I have plenty of older systems and games to play, way more than enough to last me for the rest of my days.
I wouldn't pay that price ever. Would wait for sales and be far more selective which games I buy. Only the best of the best.
Since Nintendo doesn't do much of a worthy sale, that means I would be cutting out a LOT of purchases. No more 2D Mario, no more Yoshi's Woolly World, no more Fire Emblem, or Smash Bros, etc. Games I don't buy have a chance of being on PS+ but for Nintendo I'm okay letting a lot go
I can't say that I am shocked that it's Nintendo putting up the prices.
There games always stay full.proce way longer than they should.
Crazy to think Nintendo the company who just dominates sales all the time have chosen to raise prices.
The problem with raising prices is the fact games aren't really getting much better and alot of games just aren't worth the price tag even now. So it just opens the door for poorly optimised and generic games to be sold at a higher price.
9/10 times though Nintendo games are normally pretty polished they have that.
But honestly I don't really pay full price for the newest games now let alone at a higher price.
Are they even on this planet.
Most of us are struggling financially and things are just getting worse. Esp here in the UK and parts of Europe. How is upping the price going to help people.
For me it's just greed.
I would say I’ll wait for a few months and pick up the game second hand. That option is getting less and less viable. In future my gaming will become 12-24 months behind release and waiting for a sale
No change for me, I'll continue to be 3 - 5 years behind in terms of games I'm currently playing.
I never buy full price to begin with.
I’ll just play more games from Gamepass and PS+
If everyone is waiting on discounts how is a service less money for the devs?
In November us Americans decided we wanted to pay higher prices for everything. So it's only fair we get what we wanted. It's gonna be a really long four years if an extra ten dollars for a game is getting so many people upset.
unless I really really want to play the game on day 1, I'll just wait for a sale or buy 2nd hand
@Ultimapunch it depends. Remember, people who complained about egg prices haven't complained about them since November, despite the prices increasing considerably. So, I'm sure at least some people won't have an issue with more expensive video games, because they don't mind it if it's from the person they voted for.
In my country, $80-90 = 1.4-1.5 million IDR and those amount of money can fill up your own stomach with good foods at least for 1.5 weeks. So i voted no, i can't afford that much for just one game. I'm just gonna wait for a big sale or secondhand.
But it's kinda sad really. I remember back in PS2-PS3 days where i can buy physical games on day 1 with affordable price. But now, just one Switch2 game has a price of almost 2 weeks worth of foods. sigh...i guess this is a sign where video games is not in line with my income anymore.
sony games will always come down in price months later switch games will not even years later that is a huge difference.
Doesn’t really matter games aren’t actually finished anyway until they’re fully patched and by then they’re discounted by quite a lot.
Easy!
Begrudgingly and only for select titles.
I am completely immune to the 100-200 dollar premium editions of sports games or the like. I just don't bite anymore.
The same goes for games like Siege or its likes. I sure as hell ain't paying (full price) for skins (might pay if it is part of a bundle that expands the game slightly).
Now, that rule is bent for games like KCD 2 although I didn't react fast enough to enter streams for extra content, I MIGHT buy them but you can't get what was offered through streams I think.
@HRdepartment not Nintendo first party games, though
The stance has not changed and I have seen 80 euro games around already.
My stance is that I will wait for a price cut.
It's just what it is. Thankfully I come across retailers making up the difference, but they are trying to screw them over too.
I simply don't buy them. I simply can't justify it. I have never bought a game over 65 euros and I never will.
Nintendo dont discount their own games hardly at all still being almost full price years after release.
so what if not discounting games becomes a normal for other publishers as well?
I think the developers would/should show some common sense. Not ALL games are going to be worth the top price-point, and they should align their products within the market accordingly - other wise they'll just be at risk of pricing themselves out. And those that don't buy on day 1, do so knowing that it's not long before the cost of the game drops in price anyway.
And using Nintendo as an example, their (first party) games hardly depreciate at all and still sell years after release. I think ultimately, If you have a good, solid product, people will pay for it.
@trev666 Then it's time to stop modern gaming. I got a collection for a reason. I got gaming to keep me happy till I die. 😁
BTW I will push back on the notion a bit. Nintendo games did go on sale on the eshop on occasion. It's rare, but it happens.
Not potential, inevitable.
While I’ve selected the second option ‘I’ll pay it for select games, and grudgingly’ honestly I mostly wait for games to go on sale these days. I have way to many games in the backlog and besides GamePass releases hardly looked at new games these past two years.
At this point I'd almost rather see the game industry crash than continue to opt into these continued price hikes. I already have more than enough games to keep me entertained the remainder of my lifespan, and they are making it ever harder to crave new releases. As others have noted, these days I'll patiently wait for price cuts. My days of pre-ordering are long gone.
@Nem its rare and not much of a discount either. they dont disount anywhere near the levels of other publishers
@Nem You could always sail the high seas if you're on PC...
I said similar yesterday, but £80 is perfectly acceptable to me for a big budget AAA game, which has no microtransactions, looks and performs (fps etc) excellently, and has been well tested for bugs and optimised well.
Significant and well thought out Pro enhancements would also be a must, but this really comes under the above anyway.
I actually think £80 for the above would be preferable to me, than £70 for the unfinished rubbish we often get now.
£80 games are coming, but will we get the rest...
@naruball the problem with nintendo is that they rarely go on sale (zelda tears of the kingdom went on sale once since release last december and it was 30% off). and even when they go on sale they never go below 30% off.
The big difference is most PlayStation and Xbox games always start coming in price just months, or even weeks, after they release. Nintendo games rarely come down in price, even years after release.
Why would anyone be willing pay more when the games being released now aren't worth that unless they come with dlc and everything included them I might other than that no chance complete rip off anybody willing pay it is part of the problem
I'd have to really want the game to fork out that much.
As an example, with today's exchange rate, Assassin's Creed Shadows would cost me $87, 44 US, so I'm used to the $80 mark already. With a general $10 price hike across the board, I would probably be looking at close to $100 for a new game.
So, a continued hard pass from me. I suppose I will have to wait even longer for a sale to hit a price I'm comfortable with (as an example: I still haven't seen an attractive sale price for Spider-Man 2 or GOW:Ragnarok, two games I really want).
Luckily, I've got a backlog to see me through several years, so I can wait
@get2sammyb that last sentence is a depressingly realistic assumption.
Personally I won't be spending that much on a game. They go on sale relatively fast, especially on Steam. If I was 21 and playing Call of Duty with my mates every night then I wouldn't think twice about it. Nowadays, backlog is the name of the game so I can wait for a GTA 6 price drop just like I do for every other big launch.
For me the RRP of games and the amount I will actually pay for them are completely unconnected.
They can try to charge £80 if they like, I'm no more likely to pay that than I pay £70 now.
I will continue to pay around £20 for fully patched and complete games 1 to 2 years after release. It's not like my backlog is getting any smaller in the meantime.
Once I've finished my current play-through of Dragon Age: Origins I'll be starting Death Stranding Directors Cut which I bought last week for £13 😁
I buy physical so my games are always cheaper. How long for who knows
Some have sold at that price previously, albeit mainly deluxe types. I suspect even if price went up generally there would still be some, as there are now who charge less.
Personally it means I'd be a lot more selective, less day 1 purchases and more wait for sales, and probably less digital where can, given physical from some retailers are cheaper.
Might be enough for me to finally rein in my game spending, but we’ll see what comes of it first.
It's time to pick a lane. Either video games *are" the most amazing art and entertainment medium that exists, and they're completely fantastic and worth paying for, or they're not. Put your money where your mouth is. Games are cheaper than they've ever been relative to quality and including how they go on sale over time, and for a few dollars more Ghost, GTA, DS2, etc. are all gonna be totally worth the money. There's no goddamn way you people are this frugal in all aspects of your life...
They bring down the price of games so fast that it conditions gamers to just wait. This just reinforces that. Sell games at $60 and don't drop the price so steep during the first year.
I'll just keep enjoying PS Plus and GamePass and ignore the $80 games until they go on sale.
I used to be excited and pre-order most games I wanted.
But I realised I was paying full price to beta test someone's partially finished & bug ridden games.
I now wait around 6 months and pay half the launch price, the game has more features, less bugs and there's usually a guide if I'm stuck.
I recently picked up Star Wars Outlaws cheap and whilst it was bobbins at launch, waiting 6 months gave me a much better experience and not at a premium price.
If games are going to be this expensive they need to launch in a lot better state than they do now.
The industry has been given the greenlight to increase prices to $90/£90 now.
I can't justify that. I'll stick to PS Plus games and buy the odd game day 1 like GTA 6 and sell it once i beat the story to recoup some costs.
The biggest issue if more and more people wait for price cuts or discounts , Sony sees this and they’ll make less and less games that come with risks. Games like resistance , infamous , and killzone don’t sell enough copies to justify a high budget so they’ll make more horizon games because they sell.
People spend more on free to play games lol
With the games being USD $70 right now, I’m already learning to be selective with my purchases or just waiting for sales. If Sony ends up charging USD $80+ for a game, I may have to consider finding another hobby.
Been boycotting the $70 since it started. This $80 thing doesn't phase me. They can do what they want, I've learned to wait and get a better more complete game for less anyways.
@adge_uk Exactly the same for me with Outlaws. What a great game. I bet it would get solid 9's if it was re-reviewed.
Only play on launch day if you can pay for 1 month of a subscription that offers it (game pass, ubisoft+) - cheapest way to go about it.
Or if you already have such subscription active for a longer period, ofc.
Or you manage get your title at a lower price on a cd key site (mostly valid for pc versions, though...).
Otherwise, be smart and wait for discounts.
A lot of titles get 40-50% off after 6-9 months, some even earlier, especially triple R games (remakes, remasters, reboots).
With so many games around nowadays, surely you have a hefty backlog formed up, and you can get into that while you wait for price drops.
Should I mention 90% of titles launch with bugs, and only get corrected after months of patches? One more reason to wait.
I almost always wait for sales anyway. First party Nintendo games rarely are on sale, whereas PS5 prices drop over time. If digital games start releasing for $15-$20 less than physical, I may be switching over.
This is the same as anything else, in my opinion. If you think the cost is too high, either shop around or refuse to buy the game.
It’s a hard pill to swallow. I understand that times are tough in games but I’ve been made redundant from my last two jobs, and am now looking at positions almost half of the salary I had 3 years ago. Same work, less pay. Ultimately it means I’ll buy less games, or focus on indies which are much more keenly priced.
I ALWAYS wait for sales anymore.
Games come out half baked, undercooked, and full of holes most of the time anyway. It is rare to see a game come out of the gate functioning at top notch.
Most of this is probably due to my heavy bend toward the single player experience. I'm sure multi experiences are day one purchases for many people and this might be a huge difficulty for them.
For me, it may end up affecting me in the "sale" price. Instead of a good deal being 40-50 percent off, it may end up being 30-40 percent off.
@ILikeStake YES!! Just started playing Outlaws and I am in love with it. I had to go back to read the reviews to understand why anyone wouldn't have loved it. But again... games come out half-baked.
@adge_uk Agree 100%
Sony has already pushed the price to 80€... digitally. AC shadows, monster hunter, death stranding 2, mgs delta... All 80€ on PSN. You're acting like this is some new crazy scheme Nintendo came up with. I'm not happy about these prices, but I'll always vote with my wallet as these are luxury purchases and not necessities. Physical retail only at max. 60€ if I really want it at launch and support the studio, otherwise 2nd hand at max. 50€. Digital only if it's under 10€ or DLC.
Acting like victims here is just stupid... get worked up and oppose oligarchs and fascists instead.
@Juvenlast outlaws was soo good! Felt bad cheeping out on Ubisoft getting this 2nd hand so I got the DLC. It's also good!
I'll wait for a massive sale for PS5 but my PC Steam is my main gaming rig now has been for over a year, CDKEYs sell games really cheap after 3 to 5 months after launch
Nintendo has done a great job for itself by being able to keep their prices high. For example, Mario Kart 8 came out in 2020 for $59.99. Its price five years later is…$59.99 (though it’s on sale at Walmart currently for $47.44). Compare that to, say, anything by Ubisoft, where 3 months after release the $69.99 game has dropped to $39.99 or lower…and by six months to a year later, the game is likely between $10 and $20.
Long story short, Nintendo can probably get away with charging more per game, and that’s largely because of both the fun factor and the replayability factor. You’ll come back to Nintendo’s games again and again; consumers know that, and they’ll pay for it…some begrudgingly, but pay for it they will.
It is a bitter pill to swallow
Funny enough it just makes me want to stay physical even more. At least then there’s the option to recoup some of that cost by reselling if I want to.
I think GTA 6 is the only game I’d pay that much for - because I know it’ll be relatively polished & contain lots of quality content.
If it’s a Ubisoft game, I’ll wait until it’s on sale just because I know it’ll be slop on release. In saying that, it’s been a while since I even bought a Ubisoft game.
No way I’d pay that for an EA game too.
The thing about this is that I still want to buy Mario Kart because I’ll get $80 worth out of the experience. It doesn’t feel right, but that’s one of the few games that doesn’t feel awful. That said, I’m not happy about TotK having an $80 version or Kirby. I’m not upset about DK being $70 though. That seems fine. However, Nintendo is usually the cheaper option, so I think they’re making a mistake by abandoning that. Also, this will certainly cause an increased price in some PS5 titles by the end of the year.
Imagine if Yotei is $80 at launch now… Truthfully, this price jump will hurt the third parties the most though. When I think about games I’ve gotten this year, i wouldn’t have made the risky decision to purchase KCD2 at a $10 hike. I wouldn’t have bought AC Shadows either. Of all the games I bought at $70 over the last 4-ish years, most of them I’d have passed for $80, honestly.
I thought GTA was going to do this, not Nintendo. I expect GTA is going to be ready to 1-up Nintendo on price very soon.
Oddly enough, this may be the way Xbox starts to regain traction with Gamepass by being the affordable option in the digital future…
I will continue to do what I've always done.
I'll only buy around 1 or 2 games a year at full price and they have to be the sort of games that I can't wait to play.
The rest go on the wishlist and I wait for a 70% sale. It never seems to take that long for games to hit that type of discount.
I'll wait a year when they are on-sale
@Aussiemike90 Just your two cents??? 😂 You basically regurgitated the article written by @get2sammyb as your own comment.
This seems like Nintendo forcing people towards digital. From the ugly cover design (It may grow on me. PS5 cover design has.) to the Game-Key, allowing third parties to send us a cartridge with nothing on.
It isn't a good look for them and I don't think a lot of these decisions would have been made under Iwata San.
I pay on day one about once every two years, RDR2, Cyberpunk, Far Cry 6, GT7, and next will probably be GTA6. I'm happy with the backlog bought at a max of 40 quid each. Thank Goodness You're Here was a great weekend purchase, 9 months after release 🙂
All it will do is create a wider gap between the blockbuster system sellers making even more money and everything else struggling further. People aren't going to pay £80 for titles they aren't 100% convinced on. So that means fewer new IP and fewer new devs as reluctance to take a chance on something will intensify. For the likes of gta 6, cod etc, people will moan but they'll still pay it because they know what they're getting, that isn't going to be the case for everything else and so you'll get a lot more flops and more closures and lay offs.
They'll be a time where there can't be any new IP or new studio without the financial backing of a first party or a subscription service.
Seems like the quality of games keeps declining while they keep trying to charge more for them. It's a bad trend that's been turning me off supporting consoles in the future.
There is no way I would pay that much for a game and not even 90€.
No game is worth that money no matter how good it is.
@dBackLash "Nintendo has always been a company that thrives when it's struggling imo, they always seem to mess things up after a huge succes."
Sounds like Sony with PlayStation
Okay, so digital games will be a few dollars cheaper than physical ones at the start. I wonder is it possible to find good deals later on?
Generally speaking, I am barely impressed with the digital PS games discount.
The last time when I found a good deal was Cyberpunk Ultimate for £25. It arrived within days. I think I never saw it on PS stores under £40.
@LifeGirl I remember as a kid with the ps2 and the ps3 and xbox 360 I would get one new game a month if my grades were good I instead got multiple pre owned games for the price of 1 new one fomo is a real bitch some people need better self control mind u I have a current backlog of last count 72 games I'm never running out and on my current wishlist is like 30 games and I just wait for significant price drops like half off or more
Gamefly
It made sense at $59... it really makes sense at $79.
Nintendo can charge what they want because the wait between their first party games is so long, people are willing to pay anything just to have something to play.
Sony is going the same way, especially with all the live-service nonsense - their good first party games are scarce these days. We shouldn’t have to pay more because of their poor, misguided investments.
I’ll just wait for a sale or borrow the game off a friend.
PS5, no. PS6 and that’s just inflation. Which means I feel the same way as I did PS4 to PS5. Which is fine. Same reason I won’t buy a 5Pro. Don’t upcharge me mid-gen.
That being said it’s only one game, that is being bundled by the way much cheaper, at 80 stand alone. The rest are 70 or less. I see the S2 as the start of a new gen so I’m fine with 80 in that sense because I expect MS and Sony to be 80 with their new systems, but not current.
That being said Nintendo only had one outlier game on Switch and that was TOTK (which is massive and I bought the CE for anyway. ) So considering other announcements are saying 70 for other games I think this is more of the same. But easily solved by buying the bundle that puts the game at 50 bucks.
I’ll continue to wait for deep sales. Enough games that I don’t care to be caught up with the newest.
@TruestoryYep Yes, I have a PC and I can always retreat into steam. But, I only like to play certain genres on PC. There's room to go further there, if I want to.
Why pay full price when the publishers don't have faith in their own products pricing and slash off $20-30 within a month? Yup, I'm patient and I got a backlog. I'll see y'all at BF
I stopped pre-ordering/paying full price back in 2023, now I patiently wait for dirt cheap sales in a few years.
Also helps I am currently unemployed and broke, so don't have the money to waste on full priced games anyway...
Outside of GTA VI ain't no game getting bought by me day 1 at 80.00
We as gamers never asked developers to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on game development.
As sales of titles like Hades, Stardew and Balatro will attest, graphics are still second fiddle to a game just being fun.
The answer to spiralling development costs is to just not spend that much money on making a game.
I haven't spend full price on a game probably since FF7 Rebirth, I'll probably do the same for GOT. id usually just sell them straight after, quite easily the best way if you want to try more games at full price.
@KougerKing
You are describing the pricing model accurately but then inventing a bogus motive to apply to the creators. Why do that? They have faith that some people will pay $80, and they have faith that more people will pay $40, and that even more will pay $20.
If they don’t offer all three prices over time, they would leave some money - your money specifically - on the table. That would be bad business sense that has nothing to do with the faith they have in their game.
It's coming whether we like it or not right? And I really don't think boycotting gonna help either...I think certain big boy games like GTA6 could be $150 and it'll sell 150million copies
Hard pass for now. My grouchy old-man-brain-goblins insist that videogames cost $60 brand new; If it's less then it's a good deal, if it's more then I'm being taken for a ride.
AAA-games are on a decent sale when they cost $40 and if I'm curious about one, it's an insta-buy at $20. I like these numbers, and I think I will keep them for now.
Considering $80 is just over £61 then yes, happy to have a reduction in game prices
I'd wait for a few weeks and pick up a disc from an online retailer for £10-20 less than the price on the PS Store.
As you say, @RadioHedgeFund, we never asked for game development that cost more than several blockbuster movies.
I mean look at Atomfall. £55 on the store, £45 for a posted disc on Amazon, Game Collection, etc. And that game shows up quite a lot of first party output.
Digital deluxe editions hit $80 on the regular, I’ll do exactly the same thing I do with those editions. Not buy them, and if it happens to be up for sale during some promotion, I get it for cheap.
In the case of Switch2, a base game’s price needs to be even across the board. It shouldn’t feel like you’re at a flea market, bargaining with the publisher.
If Im getting that system, it’ll be with Mario Kart World bundled in for $50. Otherwise, I won’t be picking it up.
@tameshiyaku I didn't feel bad for getting it cheap... but I did buy the DLC too. I was enjoying it so much I was like... Sabaac with Lando! I'm in!
@McDosy dont try too hard to read between the lines and don't be so naive as to think it's the creatives in charge of the financial decisions. This is modern economics, Investors and other stake holders drive the horrendous decisions that hurt them in the end. Maybe u shouldn't assume lack of faith but there's certainly impatience from those at top to try to show numbers on those sheets. Again if they won't protect the value of my purchase for even a month, there's no way I'll buy into it till it's at a reasonable sale price ... Weeks after release
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...