Well damn, I never thought i'd agree with Satan, but I don't have issues with Sleeping Dogs. It has super fun hand to hand combat. Funny you brought that game up as I started playing it again last night.
@LikelySatan You're Satan, you're full of lies and deceit. So you saying that everything is fine in GTA5 just proves that I am always right, GTA is a mess, and has been a mess since 3.
As for the horse testicle reacting to temperature, and that being some kind of ambitious game design, it is not. It doesn't make the game any more fun, and has 0 impact on anything, you can take it out of the game and no one would notice.
Character switching being ambitious? It's a pretty common mechanic my dude.
As for the shooting and driving being fine in 5, it's not, look at the previous replies I got, pretty much everyone of them say the game is a master piece, but that the shooting and driving leave a lot to be desired.
@REALAIS Yep, but the difference between me and you is that i'm always right. GTA games are made for the lowest common dominator, so i'm not even surprised of its popularity.
@REALAIS Nope, i'm not. As for the game being 12 years old, that's irrelevant, everything i've said was bad, was bad 12 years ago. Like I said, R* are still working with game mechanics that were fine in 2000. GTA6 will continue this trend, if I'm wrong and they actually make the gameplay enjoyable, i'll admit that I was wrong, and i'll stop bashing them.
But, just like Bethesda and Starfield, which I predicted would be super average due to Bethesda habits of streamlining everything in their games since Morrowind and by proxy removing a lot of what makes their games unique and fun.
GTA6 will be a prettier but clunkier version of GTA5.
@solocapers It's not a wild take, anyone that isn't a sheep following the hive mind agrees, GTA games have been bad since 3. R* are stuck in the 2000 era of game design. They have some clunky, outdated game mechanics running under state of the art graphics. And since it looks good, you guys lose your mind and think pretty graphics = good game. GTA has bad driving, shooting, a huge open world where you have nothing to do, there's literally no world interaction, the AI is bad. With all those thing being bad, you can't turn around and claim it makes a good game.
The funniest part of all of this, almost every gameplay complaints about this game can be made towards GTA too, and yet those game get praised to high heavens.
Don't misunderstand what i'm saying, i'm not saying Mindseye is good, I am saying GTA is bad.
But for whatever reason, GTA gets a free pass on everything.
Comments 8
Re: MindsEye (PS5) - GTA Producer's Latest Is a Futuristic Faceplant
Well damn, I never thought i'd agree with Satan, but I don't have issues with Sleeping Dogs.
It has super fun hand to hand combat. Funny you brought that game up as I started playing it again last night.
Re: MindsEye (PS5) - GTA Producer's Latest Is a Futuristic Faceplant
@LikelySatan You're Satan, you're full of lies and deceit.
So you saying that everything is fine in GTA5 just proves that I am always right, GTA is a mess, and has been a mess since 3.
As for the horse testicle reacting to temperature, and that being some kind of ambitious game design, it is not. It doesn't make the game any more fun, and has 0 impact on anything, you can take it out of the game and no one would notice.
Character switching being ambitious? It's a pretty common mechanic my dude.
As for the shooting and driving being fine in 5, it's not, look at the previous replies I got, pretty much everyone of them say the game is a master piece, but that the shooting and driving leave a lot to be desired.
So take your lies back to hell Satan.
Re: MindsEye (PS5) - GTA Producer's Latest Is a Futuristic Faceplant
@Artois2 Yep, fortunately for me, i'm always right.
Re: MindsEye (PS5) - GTA Producer's Latest Is a Futuristic Faceplant
Removed
Re: MindsEye (PS5) - GTA Producer's Latest Is a Futuristic Faceplant
@REALAIS Yep, but the difference between me and you is that i'm always right.
GTA games are made for the lowest common dominator, so i'm not even surprised of its popularity.
Re: MindsEye (PS5) - GTA Producer's Latest Is a Futuristic Faceplant
@REALAIS Nope, i'm not. As for the game being 12 years old, that's irrelevant, everything i've said was bad, was bad 12 years ago.
Like I said, R* are still working with game mechanics that were fine in 2000.
GTA6 will continue this trend, if I'm wrong and they actually make the gameplay enjoyable, i'll admit that I was wrong, and i'll stop bashing them.
But, just like Bethesda and Starfield, which I predicted would be super average due to Bethesda habits of streamlining everything in their games since Morrowind and by proxy removing a lot of what makes their games unique and fun.
GTA6 will be a prettier but clunkier version of GTA5.
Re: MindsEye (PS5) - GTA Producer's Latest Is a Futuristic Faceplant
@solocapers It's not a wild take, anyone that isn't a sheep following the hive mind agrees, GTA games have been bad since 3.
R* are stuck in the 2000 era of game design.
They have some clunky, outdated game mechanics running under state of the art graphics.
And since it looks good, you guys lose your mind and think pretty graphics = good game.
GTA has bad driving, shooting, a huge open world where you have nothing to do, there's literally no world interaction, the AI is bad.
With all those thing being bad, you can't turn around and claim it makes a good game.
Re: MindsEye (PS5) - GTA Producer's Latest Is a Futuristic Faceplant
The funniest part of all of this, almost every gameplay complaints about this game can be made towards GTA too, and yet those game get praised to high heavens.
Don't misunderstand what i'm saying, i'm not saying Mindseye is good, I am saying GTA is bad.
But for whatever reason, GTA gets a free pass on everything.