If you haven’t already read my Call of Duty: Black Ops PS5 review, here’s the TL;DR: it’s a rip-off.
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 on PS5 is also a rip-off, carrying the exact same issues and drawbacks. It’s completely overpriced, the DLC is a separate purchase, and it’s a straight port of a 14-year-old game — you don’t get any technical enhancements.
I don’t recommend you buy this, but if you have to get one of them, make it Black Ops 2. The sequel has some of the best classic multiplayer action going.
It’s an all-encompassing effort that represents the franchise at its online peak for so many. Some of the best multiplayer maps were born here, strong balancing saw matches play out fairly (most of the time), and it debuted the “pick 10” class system.
Just like its ported predecessor, this is the kind of multiplayer anyone sick of live service and Battle Passes would love. I think you’re being charged far too much for it, but Black Ops 2 is the better of the two for online fights.
The campaign and Zombies support the main attraction, though they’re not quite the sub-series at its best.
Treyarch went up a gear with complex ideas and mechanics in Zombies, leaning into its hardcore playerbase over casual players, who struggled to work out what to do next.
The single player spans two timelines: one follows on from the events of Black Ops during the Cold War, while the second is set in 2025 in the midst of a second Cold War.
Jumping into the future allows the campaign access to wingsuits and grappling gloves for a more varied offering that’s still fairly gripping to this day. It’s good; it just isn’t quite on the same level as the first Black Ops.
All that Black Ops 2 has to offer is of a high quality; it’s just showing its age — especially in the visuals department. The PS5 version is a basic port of a 2012 PS3 game without any graphical improvements that’s sold at a comically high price. It isn’t worth anywhere near the $40 asking price in 2026.





Comments 68
Same opinion as BO1: I'd rather have the ability to play these than not, but not bundling the DLC is crazy greedy on Microsoft's part.
I don't think that games need to have a remaster in order to rerelease them - a resolution bump is really all that's required (I don't demand new VFX in my rerelease of the LotR movie trilogy, for example).
But, as I said for BO1, if you own the PS3 version, they should have given this to you for free.
I didn't realize Push Square was in the business of grandstanding in their "reviews". This reads more like an opinion piece than a real review. I don't know how you expect anyone to take your future reviews seriously when this is obviously emotionally fueled and written for clicks and engagement. Especially when you don't even go into the real issues the port has, like input lag and server connection issues.
@wildcat_kickz I get what you're saying but, films get restorations and remasters - the picture and sound quality are vastly improved - rather than VFX being redone (I guess that would be akin to more of a graphical remake).
I agree having the ability to play them is welcome, but charging that sort of price, EACH, is tantamount to literally robbery. And people blindly buying into it are only going to allow these companies to keep taking the piss.
I don't get why people would buy this, when the PS3 disc probably costs like a fiver at most.
Actually I know why this is the case. A lot of people have sold their PS3s and are in the mood for some nostalgia. It's still a terrible deal though.
Same reply as the one from Black Ops 1 article tbh, in that this is a bad review. In fact, it shouldn't even be a review but instead a 'preview' or something.
It wasn't advertised as anything but a port and you're complaining you didn't get extra bells and whistles, that were never going to be included.
Should these have been cheaper, definitely. Should they have been free, maybe - but to be rating these classics as 4/10 is just pure farming.
@YoureTooSlowBro A review is someone's opinion. You do realise that, right?
@LiamCroft You can't be serious? This is obvious deflection. Of course a review is someone opinion, everyone knows that. But complaining about the price for a few paragraphs and slapping the word "review" on there, doesn't make it one. You turned it into a value proposition, instead of talking about the actual faults the game has. That's not a review in a way we have come to expect.
@ShadowRJ the servers on consoles are also hacked to death so having it on a console with less hacks is a god sent if you wanted to play multiplayer again. It’s been a ball I definitely have gotten my $30 worth
@YoureTooSlowBro This is a Mini Review — which we've been doing for years and is labelled as such — and is designed as more of a quicker glance at a title we wouldn't usually have the resources to commit to a full review.
I will quench my nostalgia thirst with Gears reloaded. Solid MP too.
@YoureTooSlowBro reviews are opinion pieces
@LiamCroft Why another review??
One was already done?
Or is this a review of the review?
Don't remember seeing this before anywhere?
Maybe it's a bit more popular than you guys thought it would be considering the drawbacks!
You were too nice on the score, @LiamCroft. The games are among the best CoD titles, but they deserve criticism in a big way. This and BLOps 1 are potentially the laziest and most greedy ports we’ve ever seen. Thank you for giving Microsoft the criticism and your opinion.
@LiamCroft I'm well aware of what it is, I've been a reader for a long time. Since it's made for a quick glance, I think the games actual problems should be stated. You didn't do that. That's my whole point. You completely ommitted the games real problems besides it's price. No mention of input lag. No mention of server desync and disconnections. The things that are actually worthy of a quick glance and harm the experience of the game.
I actually agree with everything you stated in your review. In fact, I wish you would have been meaner about it. I just think it's a bad look to review it based on it's price. Something thats deeply subjective, personal, and unique to everyone.
@JB_Whiting I don't know if I'd go as far as saying it's robbery - you are getting something for your money. I also think Liam is being a bit harsh on the score, but that's his prerogative. Even if the games are old, a lot of people love them; a game being old doesn't inherently make it worth less. It's just up to you to decide if it's worth the investment. I personally don't think it is, so I won't be buying them, but so it goes. I'll happily try them if they come to PS+ Essential.
The people screaming boycott playstation bought black ops 1&3 and all the dlc. Sony knows it's customers well😂
Do you need a goofy Activision account linked to your PSN to play these?
Not that I'd ever buy them, but if they pop up on PS Plus and I still have it, I'm sure I could waste a weekend on them
Imagine leaving bad reviews due to pricing lol
All us 2000s-early 2010s COD players are having a blast playing these ports!
I hope MW2/MW3 ports come next!
The real story is these are selling like hot cakes. Making easy money. Now hopefully Sony see’s the value is bringing more locked PS3 games over to PS4/PS5. I would buy some of them. I don’t need these as i have them on Xbox BC.
Hey EA are you awake? BF Bad Company 1 & 2 please?
And I still say: Keep the price out of the score. Prices change, and everyone has a different budget and willingness to pay.
I‘d pay 80 euros for a Bloodborne with 60 fps in the blink of an eye, even if it’s only 1080p.
@Max_the_German maybe if the reviewer didn’t cancel his PS Plus, he’d have the huge discount
@Max_the_German I agree the vast majority of the time. However, there are certain cases where the price becomes a factor, and this is one of them, in my opinion.
@YoureTooSlowBro it's the exact same game as in 2012, you realize that, no? So there is no need to go into more details really ...
Liam is right, it's a rip off, that's what's new (ish) ...
@BeenGamingSince_83 rip off is an opinion
I mean when Nintendo had virtual console I didn’t mind re-buying N64 and SNES games that were straight ports. Anyone playing COD probably has ps plus which makes it a $20 buy. Really not that bad of a deal.
I can tell from the comments that fools and their money are easily departed.
@YoureTooSlowBro agree its not a review of the actual game its a review of the value proposition
and it topped the ps store in sales over the weekend. the people buying this garbage are the real problem with the industry. no standards. no integrity. no will power. this enables publishers to treat customers at large like crap. nicely done! i'll be laughing in 10 or 15 years when this industry has regressed to a streaming-only dumpster fire where gamers are entirely at the mercy of the publishers in ways you cannot even comprehend.
that's IF you continue to go down this path and support the big industry with your wallet. plenty of other games to play from previous gens or options to support the smaller developers. seems like a no brainer at this point.
Get used to the inflated prices when digital is your only option.
@LiamCroft thanks for the review!
While I do think people should point out what they agree or disagree regarding the reviewer's opinion, you should definitely ban people who do not do it respectfully. It's exhausting. The level of the conversation would certainly improve without the agressive attacks
@Porco there’s literally people buying ultimate editions of Madden and NBA every year… I don’t wanna hear about Rip Offs when people be playing the same EXACT game every year with little tweaks lol
@Gaymer90 I don't see in these comments any disrespect or aggressive attacks as you put it, let alone anything that would warrant being banned
I like how you guys (the writers of these articles) don't take no %$#@ from any of us commenters! Seriously, no sarcasm, I like it! Much respect!
Already one of the best sellers it seems. That's why reviews don't really matter.
Just keep buying the slop so we can get more slop 🤦🏻♂️
They made a small review off it it's to expensive for what you get.
You pay €40 for a resolution bump with probably a new layer version of MT and monetization. That is what they can do it guess.
I had fun over a decade ago I have not bought a new COD in over a decade so ill be fine forgetting to buy them.
I already find COD to expensive for what you get already with the monetization I rather go play Warframe.
I tried to play a old COD they make it so difficult to play a old one I just gave up starting it up. Even the pickup and play is ruined.
@danzoEX You just gave the whole reason why gaming is getting worse and worse why we look at small studio's to give us real quality.
Just drown us in slop people will buy with the fanboys attacking for having a opinion.
In the end its the same of stuff with nothing but a resolution bump at €40 with monetization.
I find the new stuff boring already the best and the last good one is the COD MW remake on the PS4 with already to much monetization.
It's the game that made me think with the passes why am I giving myself a second job.
this isn't a review! it's a personal opinion about a value proposition!
lol.
Wonder what the parent company thinks about this....
Loads of lay offs and lazy reprints that work on a ps5. And people will but it, easy money for Microsoft.
@-wc- wait, isnt that exactly what a review is supposed to be?
It isnt an in depth analysis, it isnt a critique its a review of a comercial product.
And considering that it is the exact same game as 2012, with no changes whatsoever, there is no need to adress it any other way than just "is it worth your money 14 years later?"
And as someone who bought this and is loving every second of it, no, absolutely not the game IS great but 40 bucks is too much for a 14 year old game.
I swear to god, people see something bad being said about a game they like and act like its a personal attack on them.
Great review Liam, pay no atention to fools.
@Porco Honestly its even more shocking cus i have all this game and world at war for only 10 pounds i paid for it on xbox (thanks to backward compat). Microsoft are smart they are turning playstation fans into legit cash cows for cod.. honestly to me this is concerning cus it shows every tim buck devs they can rerelease the bare minimum and ps fans will buy it as ling as they dont have the means to go back and play those old game.. wow just wow
@YoureTooSlowBro A review being an opinion? Who would have thought 🙄
@Balie3000 black ops 2 is far from slop
@nomither6 The minimum-effort re-release of these games and the price they're charging is the slop. Read between the lines.
@ShadowRJ The original PS3 lobbies are now filled with hackers so playing the game on those servers just isn't fun
@DennisReynolds an opinion not on the actual quality of the game but rather being miffed that the game has no differences from the original release. The reviewer is acting like this is a remake or a remaster when it is just a simple port, which is only needed because the PS3's weird design decisions make porting a nightmare that no other game platform has issues with. Even Sony themselves have yet to find an easy way to port PS3 games over to newer console. This would be like reviewing Jurassic Park being rereleased in theaters and being critical of the fact that none of the special effects were changed and that you had to pay the price of a modern movie ticket for it.
@-wc-
How are you even able to divorce one from the other in your logic?
Price should ALWAYS factor into the equation - only fools wanting to be dearly departed from their money would demand no consideration given towards the price (Think of the "Shut up and take my money-meme).
There must be something I am missing, you can lecture me on?
I can understand feeling it’s overpriced given how little they did here, but the way PS players are buying these games AND playing them, all ABK is hearing is they “undercharged”.
@Balie3000 it’s the same game just ported over. It’s no different than it being literally backwards compatible except there’s a price for this. and the price has always been this much, CODs are never cheap no matter how old they are. they’re still expensive to buy on ps3 and pc.
there’s no line to read between
@PloverNutter I think its more they're charging £40 what's the issue.
"It's so bad, overpriced, and digital only!!! NO DISC NO BUY!!!" but then it becomes top seller and crashes the PS store. Wow, you guys really showed them! LOL
@ghostofkutaragi It's almost like the people complaining about physical games and the people buying Call of Duty aren't the same people. Weird, I know...
@nomither6 Ok dude... now run along and buy the slop
Removed - trolling/baiting; user is banned
@ghostofkutaragi I don't know what you're trying to prove. Physical "crybabies," as you call them, may be a minority, but it doesn't mean their argument is wrong. Restricting choice is not a good thing. It's inevitable, but doesn't mean it doesn't suck. Call of Duty always sells well, so Black Ops selling well isn't proof of anything other than the fact that people like Call of Duty.
@wildcat_kickz The point is that they have no argument and they are simply riding outrage because their peers and influencers told them to. Most of them don't even understand WHY ownership is important because if they did, they would be looking into options for unrestricted digital ownership instead of begging a corporation to put their slop on a dying format, which won't even have the "complete" game because of day one updates and patches. And as I explained above, the "crybabies", as I call them because they are just that, already admitted to buying these ports. All Sony has to do is dangle the right slop in front of them and they fold like paper. Case in point, Black Ops topping the charts and the record breaking amount of GTA 6 preorders. I think my point is quite clear, but yours seems to be nothing more than attempting to legitimize a performative, empty non-movement that only exists on twitter and one that has already failed. It's okay bro, I already know you've got that Ultimate Edition preorder LOL
@Balie3000 id rather not listen to you about anything
@LiamCroft like the resources committed to the 3 titles reviewed in all of June? Or maybe it's 2.5 as one was a mini-review.
@hi_drnick We don't just review games for the sake of it. We're a small full-time team, and we strategically select titles we believe our audience is most interested in coverage of. June and July have always been the quietest months of the year, hence the few reviews we published.
@EfYI @LordOfTurnips
I was echoing some other comments on here in an attempt to lampoon them, and kind of dryly show how ridiculous their perspective is right on its face.
anyway. mission accomplished I guess, lol.
literally, a review of any product is a personal opinion vs an MSRP. what on earth else could it be? 😂
I'll add a "/s" or something next time ✌️
I don't know about MP, but SP was almost farcical in how boring it was for me.
Also, super glad the rando CoD folks are showing up to remind us how easy it is to back the status quo and pretend that means they found the winning team! Stunning and bold! Like you aren't Nostradomus over there championing an inevitability.
@ghostofkutaragi yeesh. You are insufferable. Good riddance.
@-wc-
Hahaha! You nailed it - my guard was just down due to the sheer idiocy spouted from COD buds.
Take the "cOd iS aLWays exPENsive-logic" spouted somewhere in this thread. I couldn't write derisive satire on the subject better than the cod buds earnestly do.
I have less than zero interest in the Call of Duty series but I am genuinely curious why when I looked at the store today both were half price for Plus+ members. Why does my subscription entitle me to that much of a discount when someone without would have to pay twice that? It's ridiculous enough not having demos free but that pricing is pure predatory.
Also loving the mini-review format, and the personal POV.
@HonestHick I agree there should be more.
What I think has been overlooked is this is just bringing the PlayStation library in line with Xbox in terms of digital backwards compatibility.
Would I have loved a 4K remaster with 120hz option? Hell yeah!
However this is just a port. At the moment we can’t buy digital games from PS3 on the store so this “PS5” version is the only way to get it.
Because the Series consoles are backwards compatible to the 360 era I can get a digital copy of the Xbox store…and guess what the price is the same and the dlc are offered separately.
I personally think it would be great if there was more PS3 games available to buy on the PlayStation store. I wonder if this was labelled PS3 rather than PS5 people would have treated it differently as they wasn’t expecting anything other than the original game.
Do any PS1 and 2 classics available on PS5 get this much hate?
I feel the review score doesn’t reflect the content of the game, the campaign seems good and so does the multiplayer.
As someone who hasn’t played the original two BO games as I stuck with battlefield after COD MW2 back in the day and I understand it’s a straight port I’m more interested in the quality of the game and if the port has any issues affecting playability.
I’m not interested in the price as much as value for money is subjective and I don’t think many new releases get judged against their price in the same way.
@ghostofkutaragi I don't buy physical, so this doesn't affect me. I'm just not as unsympathetic as you seem to be.
@YoureTooSlowBro I'm not sure you understand what a review is. A review is an opinion of the person writing it, and informed opinion but an opinion all the same. It's not an exact science
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...