This week, a report revealed that Sony plans to disable the PlayStation 3, PS Vita, and PSP’s storefronts for purchasing. According to the article published by The Gamer, the PS3 and PSP shops will go offline from 2nd July, and the PS Vita will be disabled on 27th August. We’ve asked the platform holder to elaborate on its plans, but at the time of writing have received no response.
We can probably infer from its silence over the past 24 hours that the reports are accurate, although official confirmation is still required. There are many gaps in the original article, however, that the manufacturer will need to address: will download libraries be retained, for example? Nintendo closed down the Wii’s storefront on 30th January, 2019 – but purchased content remains available.
Communication from Sony is going to be key here, but the news couldn’t have come at a worse time. The perception around PlayStation is that it cares little for its legacy, and many fans point to the lack of PS1 games on both the PS5 and PS4 as an example. The organisation spent a short time porting PS2 titles to PS4 a few years back, but this initiative was irritatingly short-lived.
It doesn’t help that its competitor, Xbox, has committed to unifying its brand’s history under one umbrella, with all of its generations playable on the current Xbox Series X|S – and many titles from that catalogue available as part of a single Game Pass subscription. It’s not hard to envisage a similarly strong offering from Sony, spanning Twisted Metal through to Resistance: Fall of Man.
While the manufacturer has done a good job celebrating its back catalogue with blockbuster remakes of cult classics like Demon’s Souls, some commentary from executives like Jim Ryan has not helped matters. In an interview with Time, he famously asked “Why would anyone play this?” in regards to the old-school Gran Turismo games compared to the newest entry.
It’s always been clear that the PS3 has represented a noose around Sony’s neck, and jettisoning that ancient infrastructure will presumably allow PS5 to flourish in ways it currently can’t. However, if the manufacturer does intend to take the console offline in roughly three months, then it’s not giving much of a heads-up – it feels like this should have been communicated at least a year in advance, especially with new titles continuing to launch on PS Vita.
Furthermore, the platform holder is going to have to deal with the repercussions from enthusiasts. It’s unlikely the disgruntlement on social media will impact the organisation’s bottom line, but there’s a growing sentiment that Sony cares little for its history and is reluctant to celebrate its past achievements. If that’s not true, then it’s going to need to act to prove otherwise.
Comments (68)
Pretty much agree 100% with this article.
On a side note (and because I've seen this issue brought up A LOT on this site recently), I think I speak for a lot of people when I say criticizing Sony for (alleged) decisions like this isn't "Sony bashing". I personally get no enjoyment out of seeing Sony make (allegedly) bad decisions like this and drop the ball when it comes to clear communication and consideration. And I certainly don't enjoy holding their feet to the fire after supporting them since I could hold a controller as a toddler. Criticizing Sony means you care about what they make and their legacy. If you just bury your head in the sand and get angry at fair criticism, then you're part of the problem.
You know a console wasn't a success when its shop is shut down the same year as the previous generation.
Also Sony should really hire a new communication team. They have made way too many mistakes this past year.
For years, I known I could not trust Nintendo with digital purchases because every generation they make a new store and shut down the old one.
Sony had me just worried, that worry intensified when they removed ps3/Vita from the we page and now here we are.
This, in my book, places PlayStation in the same box as Nintendo. I'll never again buy a digital game from Sony, because it is certain they will eventually do this again.
Only one I feel I can trust with digital purchases is Steam, maybe GOG, and so far XBox has been maintaining their 360 store (they kinda have to, it's needed for BC) so that's a bit reassuring.
@RBMango I think the problem with the Internet is that criticism quickly goes overboard — and this happens with everything, not just gaming.
Obviously, I'm unhappy about this as well, and I also wish they would have spent some time to get (at least) PS1 titles running on PS4 and PS5. However, while I'm irked by it, I'm not willing to act like this is "end of days for PlayStation", which is where a lot of the criticism goes.
I think the Internet in general ventures far too quickly into hysterics, which drowns out the legitimate criticism and leaves people rolling their eyes.
That said, if Sony planned to do this, I think it's very poor that they didn't give at least a year for people to get used to it. These services should be shutting down on 31st March, 2022 if they're only getting around to announcing it now.
@get2sammyb it's obviously not "end of days", but for many, this is going to cause a big drop in trust.
@get2sammyb Sure, I get that. This doesn't spell the doom of PlayStation. I don't believe in that kind of hyperbole.
But, this case is just yet another small thing to add to the pile of already questionable things Sony has said and decisions they've been making for a while now. We have a saying at my place of work: if you keep racking up small screw-ups, you'll end up with one big, noticeable s***ball eventually. And that's what I fear Sony is going to have in a few years down the road. Imagine what would happen if Xbox finally closes the gap with high-quality exclusives. PlayStation would look really lackluster compared to their competitor regardless of how many great games they make this generation.
@get2sammyb Thanks for this article, it is spot on. I have talked about gaming preservation a lot in the forums and it is a topic that personally interests me.
As a side not Nintendo will make Wii eshop downloads unavailable in an undiscosed future time: "The ability to re-download WiiWare and Virtual Console games will also stop at some point. We will announce specific details as that time approaches."
https://en-americas-support.nintendo.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/27560/p/604#s1q2
I think the legality of this in the European Union is questionable.
This just gives more doubt of being able to play any past Ratchet and Clank games without paying a lot of money.
Insomniac better be working on a collection or I'm going to go mad.
If Sony aren't commenting on this then it must be true. Where is the denial? We'll have to wait and see what happens over time.
I think this just epitomises the problems with Playstation under Jim Ryan's stewardship - they clearly haven't got a plan or a clue as to what they're doing.
Removing the PS3 and Vita titles from the PS Store is one thing (somewhat stupid but I can sort of see why) but actively disabling the consoles' stores shop fronts? At worst, leave them alone if there are no more games coming onto those platforms.
Otherwise, we can hope that the PS4 & PS5 get a facility to download games to the console and then allow transfers to a handheld. Other option is that they add a Retro page to the dismal PS Store so we can download games.
One final thing: how long before the PS3 and Vita get kicked off the PSN and we can't get to our games saves? That'll be the next step.
@sanderson72 Jim Ryan is THE problem with Sony PlayStation, he's just a business man and that's all he knows. He isn't passionate whatsoever about games and gaming, or the preservation of games. Jim Ryan needs to step down!
Great article. I won't be too fussed if I can't buy new games, but I'll be almighty hacked off if I can't redownload past purchases (and past PS+ games assuming I still am holding a sub).
What it has done though is look through my PS3, PS Vita and PS4 digital games and try and work out which ones I'll do without, as I've only got a certain amount of storage space for games, especially for the Vita.
It's also changed my view on purchasing games too. I'd got quite used to buying digital, as a convenience and with sales, getting discounted games. This manoevre has meant I'll only buy physical PS5 games and then it'll be a lot fewer than I'd intended, given the cost of them. So the decision is counter-productive for their current cash cow, never mind with previous, discontinued, machines.
I look forward to the official news from Sony, to hopefully clarify what is going on.
@sanderson72 The Dev of Scourgebringer (last Vita Game that was approved for Release) said on Twitter that the Vita Store originally was supposed to shut down in 2018 already so this decision was made way before him
@Snake_V5 The Dev of Scourgebringer (last Vita Game that was approved for Release) said on Twitter that the Vita Store originally was supposed to shut down in 2018 already so this decision was made way before him, same as PS5 only having BC with PS4
@Tharsman Absolutely, and that's why I think effective communication is essential.
@Snake_V5 This is an overreaction and just isn't true.
I agree on the timing. Sony should've published an article with a more broad time frame. Just a random report article shared on social media usually generates way more negative overreactions.
To be fair, it’s not their fault that a leak ruined their timeline
@Deadlyblack According to the Article they were planning on releasing it till end of march so it was just leaked too early. Imho they could just come out with it now tho lol
Hear hear. This is spot on Sammy. I've thought on this all night and you have basically said what i am thinking.
We have all known that this has been a long time coming (quite frankly, in the case of the vita its been painful), with Sony stopping sales on the store (excluding cross-buy titles) and the lack of obvious maintenance taking place - the vita store has been a disgrace for years - but now, at a time when Microsoft are sucking alot of goodwill and mindshare away from Sony (which they fought extremely hard for during the PS4 generation), they simply need to stop being aloof and communicate with their customers.
Granted, until we recieve confirmation from Sony, all of the news is currently a rumour - but things we need to know:
Also other questions - legacy. Will all this content be available on another service like PS Now. Why should all of the hard work of developers be wasted. Get it all on Now unless licenses dont allow it.
And communicate with your developers. I follow the vita community closely, and a vast number of developers are completely disenchanted by your behaviour and lack of communication.
Take my word on this. How Sony respond to this issue now, is going to have a massive impact on the future, even if it doesnt obviously seem that way. Why should people buy a digital ps5, or digital content on PS5, if they cant rely that their purchases are safe? Why should people buy into the Playstation ecosystem, when their market competitor is making people's purchases all the way back to the original xbox available free of charge. Its a big deal in my opinion
@JapaneseSonic I doubt much would change on Sonys stance for BC. They have the tech to provide PS1 games on PS4 and PS5 (at least digitally since they don't have a CD. Laser on either,) and they have not done so.
PS2 emulation on PS5 is also not unrealistic.
If Sony could go back in time, it's likely they would had engender the PS3 very differently, but their stance on BC support would be the same.
@get2sammyb What? Of course it's true. Most people know that Jim Ryan isn't good for PlayStation. This is a guy who said "who would want to play PS1 and PS2 games today", does that sound like someone who cares about PlayStation? This is a guy who at a convention said to someone there "hey, you look like the guy from God of War", he doesn't even know who Kratos is and he's the head guy of Sony.
I can guarantee you that for more or less with every bad decision, Jim Ryan is the guy behind it. Even moving Sony HQ to USA was probably his idea. All this bad desicions are happening more than likely because of his leadership, and this is a guy who's been with PlayStation from more or less the beginning too.
The true great were Andrew House, he was actually passionate as well as a business man. Adam boyes, all these guys are the true greats!
Jim Ryan is the Dom Mattrick of Sony.
@JapaneseSonic I'm not commenting on the success or otherwise of the PS5 it's just that the old generation seems to be irrelevant under the new Sony management, principally Jim “Why would anyone play this?” Ryan.
Perhaps they need the server space for something cool and groovy for the PS5 - I don't know, but it seems like a trivial exercise to keep the download games options available.
As Sammy says, we need communication as to what they're going to do. If they have a backup plan (as a PS Store Retro page I mentioned) then I think the community who have and still play on older consoles will be OK with that. If however, they do nothing and just take it all off-line, it'll dent the confidence of some of the community.
Jim Ryan is a POS. He's one of the biggest problems Sony has. They should replace him and get someone with a less arrogant, more holistic vision.
@Snake_V5 Sony is bigger than uncle Jim lol. I think its easy to lay the bad decisions at his door, but Sony moved Playstation HQ to the US before he took charge - and he has been at Sony since 1994. He knows the business inside out. He isn't perfect and i preferred Shawn Layden, Andrew House etc, but i think he gets an unecessarily bad and unfair rep ( i agree, his comments on retro games were very poorly chosen)
Lets see what the future brings. Yoshida is doing a great job in the indie scene, and they are bringing true Sony people into key roles like Herman Hulst.
I want to see more senior representation at Sony from Japan. Repair relationships with Japanese Devs (if indeed they are in need of repair), but who knows. Car salesman Spencer has done an amazing (AMAZING) job at turning Microsoft around. He says the right things (though often goes back on promises), but i think his positive public image tends to make Jim Ryan look bad in comparison, as he is less emotive or effusive. You dont stay at a company and work your way up to where he is without skill.
Who knows, maybe Sony need a Jim Ryan right now pulling off exclusivity deals in order to counter the approach currently being taken by Microsoft in buying up all these developers.
It could be worse. Sony could be led by Don Mattrick or invite Phil Harrison back...
If people can't buy things from the stores, that's one thing (which is dumb, but i can sort of understand it). However, if that means that people won't be able to access their purchased products, but will be forced to micro-manage their games like a RE game, then people have every right to be upset about. If that's indeed what's going to happen, the least Sony could do is give a huge time window for people to organise their library and offer monetary compensation to its users (at least those who used the online store).
Jim Ryan has already communicated their plans loud & clear...
“WE BELIEVE IN GENERATIONS”
This quote was taken to mean they wouldn’t be releasing any new PS4 games now that PS5 was officially released, seems we were short sighted!
Props to PS for at least reaching out to Sony for a commentary, but that's all there is to do about it and nothing to discuss until an official statement rather than the umpteenth "source familiar with the situation" the likes of which are steadily turning the already fragile reputation of gaming newsblogs into a parody of itself. I needn't even highlight all the gaps in the current narrative, from the short deadline (a couple months is a plugjerk even for a few games like last year's Danganronpa, let alone for three platform libraries) to the lack of any details on redownloads - the latter are normally a given in Delistingville, but Vita users, similarly to 3DS ones, can't redownload games without opening the Store app first. Are we supposed to believe that Source-senpai is familiar with the whole shutdown but not with such topical parts of it? The news could raise a lot of eyebrows and drive many towards CFWs (although ironically, I still couldn't do that without a spare Vita - jollyrogering my primary one would render the PS4 literally unplayable for me in return😅), but it has to be news first. Apparently NL aren't the only ones who seem to have forgotten they have a RUMOUR tag?
@Tharsman Nintendo has had a glorious three generations of digital stores, and only one of them has been shutdown in specific circumstances - keeping the users' access to already purchased titles nonetheless and outliving the respective platforms by almost a decade overall.
@JapaneseSonic many emulators - and official tech like PSP's PS1 functionality - are capable of adjusting the window size to combat resolution discrepancy. The only people who would have an issue with that are those who believe in video games expiring like dairy overtime to begin with, but they never made the bulk of the market even before the NES/SNES/PS1 generations grew up to come back into gaming with a steady income (then again, they also came back with a taste for portability, and Sony still nonchalantly believes that portability is only required for Candy Crush these days).
@get2sammyb "I think the Internet in general ventures far too quickly into hysterics, which drowns out the legitimate criticism and leaves people rolling their eyes."
If that isn't the biggest well-stated fact of the world today, I don't know what is.
Sony really should treat it's legacy better. Sure, there is PSNow where you can stream legacy games, but streaming should be the "option" not the "only way" to get these games going forward.
I understand the PS3 had an architecture that isn't exactly well-suited for emulation/porting (which is why I still hold onto my PS3), but the PS5 is more than powerful enough to emulate PS2 and PS1 games natively.
People would be screaming joy from the rooftops if Sony somehow put out a tweet that said: "See those old PS2/PS1 games on your shelf? You can play those" with a picture of the PS5 to compliment it.
Or how about restoring PSOne and PS2 Classics from PSN. I would gladly redownload the games I have on my PS3 onto my PS5!
I think games like Astro Bot are unique and creative baby steps in celebrating Sony’s legacy, but the main point of contention in this article is one that has been bothering me for the last while: communication. It feels lacking to me. I know the vision is there as we’re drip fed exciting news on the future of VR and upcoming games but there’s been no effective or consistent conduit for communicating that vision.
It’s sad to me when what felt like one of the single biggest recent news days on this site was like eight separate articles gleaned from a single GQ interview with Jim Ryan. In my opinion, that’s not forging an exciting path forward for PlayStation and not an effective way of communicating respectfully to it’s core fan base.
@Get2sammyb If You Ever Got To Have a Sit Down With Jim Ryan What Would You Ask Him?
My biggest worry is my back catalog of games and PS Plus games that I do not have or could even fit on my PS3 or Vita.
I am sure most of the people here would want to look over the store to buy a few more titles if they went on last days sale. Not knowing that they will still be available for download really hurts.
I guess the sad thing for me is ps3 is probably my favourite generation, I still play a fair amount even if I buy less. I feel they were really on their game after early mistakes of the generation and it feels like after the success they’ve had recent they’ve gone back to the old ways.
I really worry about the lack of being able to sync trophies and things like that if they start turning things off which would be a real shame.
@JapaneseSonic "I think ps1 and ps2 games are so old they just wouldn't look good on modern TVs"
The thing you miss is that the PSX has a huge library of 2D games, many of them fantastic JRPGs. These games are practically timeless, and games like Vagrant Story still are fantastic and simply need a resolution bump, something every decent emulator can do easily.
Also, a lot of PS2 games might not impress you, but a lot of them still hold up on many people's eyes. Many still get "remasters" that are simply ports with increased resolutions.
I purchased every single Rockstar PS2 game released for PS4, something I'm sure I'll now have to worry about as they sooner or later shut down that section of the store too, who knows how many years from now.
@nhSnork Two. They closed the DSi store, and the Wii store. The writing is on the wall for Wii U and 3DS stores.
Also, "keeping access" was very conditional to "download everything and hope that particular device does not break, because you wont ever be able to transfer those games to another device.
@Tharsman I'm a little confused about wii. I've been under the impression that games weren't available for download anymore (a view I got from YouTube videos) but now people are saying they still are.
As for over reacting to rumours, I think it's fine to state your disdain for the worst case scenarios. Maybe, just maybe someone from Sony is out there gauging the reaction, and it might influence the decisions, who knows. If nothing else it gives people something to read.
It's just the uncertainty. I'm not expecting support for old platforms forever and I get usership of these consoles is very very low BUT if you want to get people to buy into a digital future, respect peoples digital libraries.
I get where Jim Ryan is coming from - I suspect that the people that want backwards compatibility in older generations and those that play it are different but game preservation and legacy is important AND a no brainer. If I can't buy a game, how does someone get access to it?
I've learned the hard way to buy physical copies of games after the famous hack back in 2011... My only question now would be "are they cutting online support & trophies sync at the same time as closing the stores ?"
What Jim Ryan has done since he became head of SIE has been very reminiscent of what Don Mattrick did in the late 360 era and the initial XB1 reveals before being fired. This feels like another one of those cases.
@RBMango This 100%. Sony are approaching 2005 era Sony with how arrogant and wrong-headed they seem to be acting. Calling them out and withholding custom are good for the company, because it'll force them to make better, more pro-consumer decisions.
Why not do an article about how you don't own any digital game you've bought?
You're paying for a licence to play. A licence that can be rescinded at any time.
How do people not know that?
@Tharsman right, I forgot they shut down the entirety of the servers. But Wii and DSi were the same generation, not two - and used the same third party servers Nintendo decided to eliminate the dependence on. Considering how long it took them, I fail to see a precedent for Wii U and 3DS eShops to go down anytime before 2025 at worst.
How they handle this will change how people make all game purchases in the future. Personally If I lose access to PSN on PS3, and can no longer download my hundreds of digital games, sync my trophies to my account, or access my cloud saves. Then I honestly will probably never trust to buy another digital game from Sony again.
@RBMango Hear hear.
I'm glad you got that in at the top where everyone can see it.
There are a lot of over-reactions to what Sony do lately, and to what people say about Sony. Personally I do believe that it is popular in some corners to slam Sony, because of course it is, but you're not wrong either. It goes both ways.
If you question one decision they make, you're a "hater". If you suggest that people are over-reacting to another decision they make, you're a "fanboy".
Honestly it's tiresome, these discussions are not fun anymore, and it happens on every site. In the past week I've been called a fanyboy for suggesting the save transfer thing isn't that big a deal, and I've been called a hater for suggesting that if Sony don't have a replacement plan for access to legacy content then they'll have handled this current decision very badly.
But yes, 100% agreed on all points in this article.
Hopefully we can all still obtain purchased digital games PS3,PSP and Vita. It's important to know as the PS3 was the first Sony system to have a digital store and I feel that what they do now will give us an idea of what will happen to our PS4 and PS5 digital purchases in the future.
Sadly, it felt inevitable that Sony would shut down (like Nintendo) access to its digital store for (as some might call them) "legacy" consoles, although I do feel its a little early for the Vita but to be honest, I never felt like Sony gave proper support to the Vita anyway.
Steam (on PC) seems to be the best right now for being able to play digital games purchased years ago, I have since moved to PC gaming so I hope I'm not wrong. Steam has been around for around 15 years and to my knowledge no games have been removed due to a lack of compatibility or other reason.
I wonder how many newer players really care about older games anymore. But Sony should figure out how to make older games available, they had quite a few PS1 and PS2 games available on PS3 and PS4. WTH? Sony screwed up on the PS1 mini too. Can you really play all OG Xbox games on the new system?
Lol are people really trying to make a big deal out of dead consoles stores being taken down? You'll most likely be able to still download purchased games. The reality is people need to move on or make sure they only buy physical. The ps3 is 14 years old now. How often do you even use the store on a 14 year old console?
I had already started the PS5 with getting digital games for my convenience but if Sony doesn't let me access my Vita games that I already purchased and have spend hundreds on then I will stop immediately and not buy any future games on the store.
@jorel262 no you cant play all of Xbox games on their newer consoles. Less than 30% of total OG Xbox and 360 games are BC.
This announcement truly upset me, they better still allow us to download already purchased PS3/PSP/Vita games after the stores are taken offline.
Eventually they will remake the classics and people can stop complaining.
@mucc I and many other people I know use it all the time.
Just make digital psone, ps2, psp, and psvita playable on ps5 sony, I can't believe smartphone with emulator is a better psone console than ps5.
Lmao, "must communicate." Because Sony's definitely been in the habit of communication lately, haven't they?
We won't hear from them for at least a week on this.
@Fyz306903 true. let us just call this the "jim ryan" era then since it is obvious that ryan is the one screwing up the formula that was working so well when he wasn't in his current position.
they dont need to. its a rumour until they say otherwise
@JapaneseSonic
no, thanks. Cerney has yet to make a next gen console. PS4 was barely an improvement over PS3 and PS4 is less still. There are PS4 games that look better than PS5
sony MUST blah blah... people demand news, updates, responses these days like a ticker-tape of social media posts. "according to a source close to the situation..." - whether or not it is true, responding to every bit of "news" from a "source" is a dumb way to run an organisation. if and when it does make an announcement on its own time regarding closing digital stores, analyse the information that is provided then.
Well, my PS3 is still hooked up, and was probably my most played console last year during the lockdowns. Only reason I didn't buy more games on it was the limited options for memory expansion.
And if this is the route Sony are going, then I'll just use PS for exclusives, and get games on PC and Xbox more, where I feel more confident about my platform's being future proof and my library being accessible.
"Sony Must Communicate Its Plans for PS3, PS Vita, and PSP"
And if the original article is to be believed, they will... at the end of the month. The previous PushSquare article says so.
"Sony will confirm the news at the end of this month, with the information coming from a source "familiar with the situation", according to the website in question."
So this article seems... a little pointless. 🤔
i would guess the amount of hours spent on PSN from PS3/vita/psp must be exceedingly small these days.. personally speaking, i only played killzone 3 (i continued to play the multiplayer for quite awhile after PS4 came out - shadowfall wasn't nearly as good) and resistance 3 on my PS3. it's now in the attic with a box of about 150 physical discs.. i literally have no idea what i bought digitally. another of the reasons i don't buy digital often.
is it legal to take it away? depends what you mean by "take away".. you never owned anything more than a licence in the first place, so no longer providing it for download is perfectly legal. at the same time, it's not going to be deleted from your harddrive. though if it were the case that future downloads were removed, it would a big problem for vita owners with a decent size library given the size/cost of the memory cards.
i doubt the clamour for PS1 and PS2 games on PS5 is that big. i never owned either console.. can't say i've any particular desire to play them either. for the success of crash bandicoot (which was a remake), shadow of the colossus remake (fantastic as it was) hardly sold at all, neither did parappa the rapper remaster, medieval remake, wipeout collection, jak and dexter bundle.. etc. and the number of people who would play gran turismo 1 instead of any modern racer is exceptionally small. and i suspect for all the third party games and jrpgs that people get rose-eyed over would be more hassle to sort out licences etc than its worth.
@Richnj - you can install pretty much any 2.5" sata drive in a PS3. i upgraded my original 80gb model to 500gb at the time. upgrading storage was almost trivial.
Sony PR really needs a forceful response that they aren’t cutting off access to already purchased games. It should have already happened.
I’m no fan of Ryan, the echos of Mattrick are strong. I was disappointed when Microsoft blew all the progress and good will of the 360 with the Xbone launch and hope Sony isn’t on the same path now.
@leucocyte I have a 1TB and it still isn't big enough to fit all my PS3 games.
@Playstation FYI, PS3 and PSP are from the same generation. My comment was referring to the Vita as the failure.
We just heard that Sony has racked up massive 2020 profits. Now they say they need to close legacy storefronts due to costs? I'm calling BS, Sony's all-consuming greed will be their downfall. Handing Microsoft another win, will seriously damage Sony's brand.
Closing the store is one thing, but turning off servers for downloads and gameplay is quite another. I suspect-hope they simply close the store but keep purchase downloads going in perpetuity. Suddenly deleting all access to paid for ps1ps2ps3 licences would be a huge story, the internet would meltdown and microsoft would make hay. I'm more worried they shut off all online play on ps3, I predict that's not too far off unfortunately
If they are going to do this then every game should be dropped to 75-95% off. So much that is going to become unavailable soon has potential to make some money. I'd be tempted to play something like Streets of Rage again if I could get it for 1 pound.
Instead of "communicate its plans", Sony now silently killed their old web version of the store around half a day ago.
So the "?smcid=psapp" trick won't work and no PS3/Vita/PSP games, DLCs, themes and avatars could be purchased using web browser anymore.
Thanks Sony! and Thanks Jim!
Tap here to load 68 comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...