Now I never write reviews… well I say never, the only review I ever wrote previously was for Just Cause 3 back in 2021, so why then and why now? Why did Just Cause 3 (and now its successor) of all things engender (or give cause for) me to put down the controller and hammer away at the keyboard for a couple of hours, when no other game (and I’ve played some bangers to be fair) did? Well… it was just damn good fun! So in that vein… it’s time for @colonelkilgore’s triennial Just Cause Review-mega fest! Well… a review for Just Cause 4 at the very least.
So… am I writing this thing simply for the giggles or did this fourth entry actually give me a good reason to put finger-tips to keys? Well I’m pleased to say the latter… and most definitely so.
Pre-play
Even though I enjoyed the heck out of Just Cause 3 back three year ago, I wasn’t overly enthused to begin the next instalment. I think I’d probably forgotten quite how much I enjoyed the trilogy-capper… or just assumed it was a right time, right game kinda thing. So there was that… but also the fact that I’d heard what a step-down Rico Rodriguez’s fourth adventure was when compared to 2 and 3. As a result of this, it’s fair to say I loaded it up with some trepidation that it could potentially sully the franchise for me.
One man’s trash is another man’s treasure
I needn’t have worried though. There is just something about the Just Cause series which provides the perfect blend of serenity and chaos that soothes my gaming id. I’m not saying that they’re for everybody… and that’s pretty obvious from the small and ever-decreasing audience that the series ends up reaching but it hits for me that’s for sure. For one, I’ve always liked open-world military games harking all the way back to Mercenaries: Playground of Destruction and right the way through to Ghost Recon: Breakpoint… hell my favourite Metal Gear Solid is V (don’t hate me). For two, it’s the gameplay… more specifically the traversal.
It’s not about the destination, it’s about the journey
So I waxed lyrical about the wing suit-grapple hook combination used to traverse the open world during my first review three year ago and nothing has changed. Well I say nothing, if anything Avalanche have actually refined the experience of covering ground in this manner. And it is the wing suit/grappling hook combination for traversal that provides the serenity to which I referred previously. Soaring over mountains and swooping down valleys and through into the crevices of the landscape is an absolute joy and to quote my 2021 self: “… is the best traversal system in all of gaming!” Hefty claim that but I still stand by it. There is just no other game that manages to make the simple art of map navigation this much fun. To further my point, I do find that after 30 or so hours in an open-world game that I start to resort to using fast travel. I actually hate to do this as I do find that it breaks my immersion… but to put it simply “ain’t nobody got time for that!” Well with the Just Cause games I would never even consider fast travelling and actually become enthused by a cross-map journey to begin the next mission or task… as that is the games main strength. The use of the wing suit in conjunction with the grapple is somewhat tricky to master but once perfected, the player just has absolute control over Rico’s speed and direction and this produces some truly majestic moment-to-moment gaming.
Combat and destruction
As with the previous entries in the series, the combat is pretty mediocre. The gunplay seems quite floaty, as Rico just doesn’t seem to have the weight of… let’s say a Rockstar protagonist. It also has some snap-to aiming which I’m not a massive fan of but I guess the developers thought it necessary what with the movement speed and verticality available to the player. All in all, the combat is nothing to write home about but is at the very least serviceable. The destruction on the other hand is as fun as ever, with the huge map dotted with military basis and installations ready to be purged. It’s bubble-wrap gameplay for sure and that’s no bad thing when sandwiched between the more serious military fare I’ve been playing of late. That is no sleight on Spec Ops: The Line nor Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell: Blacklist as I enjoyed both immensely… but this seemed to come at just the right time if you catch my drift.
Physics 101
So there has been numerous videos and text reviews referring to what was lost from the Just Cause games with this fourth entry but I was very pleasantly surprised by what was added. Namely new tools that can be applied to your grapple tether that can have hilarious effect within the games sandbox. The Just Cause engine always had pretty impressive physics, what with slingshotting unsuspecting enemies 100’s of feet into the air before falling to their death… or concocting an elaborate system of tethers to draw large red-tipped constructions together in explosive conflagration. And all that is still present but Rico now has the ability to tether helium balloons and nitro-boosters to various npc’s and artefacts too. I found that I hardly used these during my campaign playthrough and just thought the devs had added them for the sake of adding them. I eventually found the reason for the additions when mopping up the platinum though. There are around 150 vehicle stunts that you can attempt across the map and the vast majority will require a mastery of one, two or all three of the tether-tools at Rico’s disposal. One stunt in particular will live long in the memory, which involved me having to be sat in the driver seat of a monster truck as it passed through a checkpoint three-quarters of the way up the tallest skyscraper in the game. Needless to say, the solution… or my solution involved tethers, balloons and boosters. All of which had to be activated and deactivated at just the right time for the desired result. In fairness, not all of the vehicle stunts are as thrilling or tricky… but there were some highly satisfying physic’s puzzles there that actually reminded me of Breath of the Wild’s shrine puzzles (don’t hate me #2).
What was lost
So Avalanche Studios did try to shake up the base-clearing formula and this seemed to be the main thing that gave series-veterans cause for concern. I read the reviews prior to playing it and I have to admit I felt concerned too. I always took great pleasure when playing Just Cause 2 and Just Cause 3 from fastidiously taking out each and every military base and installation I come across. Blowing up each and every red-tipped military construction and component until the location is 100%’d. Well this is no longer a thing… you can still blow up every red-tipped enemy artefact if you like but there is no need… and they’ll simply respawn anyway. Instead, there are now specific actions and requirements to complete for a base/location to be brought into the fold. Once done, Rico acquires points which can be used to advance the front line rebel force into new areas still held by the occupying military force. I’m not gonna lie, I definitely think that I preferred the way it was handled during the previous games but in fairness to the game, it didn’t really impact my time with the game as much as I originally thought it would.
You can take the weather with you
The devs added freak weather conditions for some reason. Lightning, thunder, dust-storms and tornadoes. You know where I mentioned earlier, that I initially thought that the new tether tools may have been added simply for the sake of adding them. Well this really seems the case here… pretty ridiculous if you ask me and adds very little to the game if anything at all. The less said about this the better in my opinion so…
Frame rate, loading and servers
So having re-read my previous review of Just Cause 3 prior to the writing of this, I had forgotten about the issues that I experienced in this regard. I had completely forgotten that my initial venture into Just Cause 3 had given me a headache due to the stuttering 30fps frame rate. Now I very rarely suffer with headaches so the fact that this rang an undeniable bell with my recent foray into Just Cause 4 is fairly profound. I actually had my first ever migraine when starting Just Cause 4 recently. It only happened during that first session but is indicative of the game itself in my opinion. The movement is just so fast and multi-directional, that when your eyes are trying to process this at a still somewhat inconsistent 30fps it is unceremoniously jarring, so beware!
Server-wise, I encountered none of the issues which meant that I had to delete well over 100 friends from my PlayStation profile when attempting to load into Just Cause 3. I was concerned when initially loading the game up and was ready for another cull (don’t hate me #3) but fortunately the game and its servers seemed far more up to the task of accepting over 99 friends in this instance.
Verdict
Loved it to be honest… much more than I thought I would too. I know the game is not to be taken seriously, that the narrative is full of cheese, that the characters are chewing the scenery when ever they get a monologue and that the games performance is somewhat questionable at best but… it’s fun. I think we sometimes lose sight of why we started gaming… and that’s easy to do what with how modern gaming has evolved into serious works of artistic expression in some cases but the main reason I originally picked up a controller back in the early 80’s was to have fun… and that’s what this series invariably delivers.
PS. It’s better than Just Cause 2 (okay, you can hate me now)
@colonelkilgore Great review, Glad you liked JC4 so much.
Personally I liked a lot of things over JC3 except for the challenges, these were a major step back for me, gone are the flying through umpteen hoops and now it is just three. For me the challenges were enough to place it behind JC3 as my favourite.
I also don't remember any decent plane challenges or car challenges although I might be misremembering here as it has been a while.
Overall JC4 just felt rushed and lacks the side content.
@colonelkilgore Really nice review, sir. I’ve never played a Just Cause game. Would JC4 be a good entry point for the uninitiated? I have both JC3 and JC4 in my library from PS+.
“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”
@Th3solution thanks buddy, I’d probably suggest starting with Just Cause 3 tbh… in my mind that is the ultimate Just Cause game. A lot of people still maintain that Just Cause 2 is the best… and while I love that game, the fact that it didn’t have the wing suit will always place it below 3 and 4 imho.
@Colonelkilgore Hm interesting that Iam not like the only one who dont like fast travel in open world *games hehe. Although I like usually end up using some later in games I play. Also Just Cause is a series that have a special place in my heart (although I have never played one).
The main reason that I dont like, or perfer fast travel is that I think that one of the points of open world games is like to experience the game, and well the world when you are playing the game which you like miss when you use fast travel hehe.
@oliverp yeah I totally agree, I had a friend who played the whole of Red Dead Redemption by taking the stagecoach to each and every mission… with no extra curricular exploration nor activities. Needless to say I was bloody horrified when I found out and we haven’t spoken since 😉
The Last of Us Part II Remastered (PS5) - Impressions
So I just finished The Last of Us Part II Remastered on PS5 after 30 hours of playtime. Absolutely phenomenal game. It's the best Naughty Dog game I've played and I've played all of their PlayStation titles except for the racing games. What elevated this title above the first The Last of Us for me was the much more serious and dark story. I prefer darker stories in general, so I enjoyed the story in the second game a whole lot more than the first game's.
The developer certainly wasn't afraid of making "permanent decisions" in the story. It was like Game of Thrones in that regard, literally anything could happen, and I love that. I've mentioned before as a gaming pet peeve that most developers don't stick with their decisions and as a result, I don't believe in them when they happen. But that's not the case with Naughty Dog. Kudos to them. It made the game much better.
In terms of the gameplay, I enjoyed it a lot. Great variety of weapons, fun crafting system and rewarding skill tree. Not to mention the absolutely brutal combat. Every kill felt impactful and satisfying. I also liked the different options you had for stealth, such as takedowns and silenced weapons. I genuinely loved the gameplay.
I can't forget to mention how excellent the pacing and the structure of the game was. Every time you were done with an intense chapter, the game would let you cool down with some relaxing story moments. And when you think the game is too easy because you have so many weapons and tools at your disposal, it strips you away from them and starts you over in order to keep things interesting. I'm genuinely impressed by how well-executed the pacing and the structure was. You could tell Naughty Dog put a lot of thought into the game with consideration to the player experience.
Overall, this is the best Naughty Dog game I've played. It was quite frankly a perfect experience. I don't really have any complaints about the game.
As I mentioned in the main thread, I kinda feel like something must have happened to this game in production. The more I played Rise of the Ronin, the more unfinished it felt. I don't know whether they ran out of time, or there were clashing visions on the production side (or just a general lack of vision) or their budget was slashed, or what. But whatever it was, I can't remember the last time I played a game that felt unfinished in quite the weird way this does.
Like, for example, they've created this really detailed slice of history, teaming with life and authenticity. This game isn't exactly a beauty, but the art direction is absolutely excellent and the choice to go for a collection of smaller open worlds rather than just one massive one allows them to pack each one with detail and landmarks. Yet... there is almost no way to meaningfully interact with any of it. It may as well be one massive film set.
You'll visit sprawling urban centres, bustling markets, farming or fishing villages, famous landmarks and other such things, and there is rarely even a single NPC to even talk to in these spaces, let alone any sort of gameplay to engage in, either. It is like the world is finished, but is still waiting for most of the game to actually be added into it.
It is most striking in the core narrative, where by Act 3 the game was just utterly incomprehensible for me. It starts as a game about the player making choices - what factions to side with, what views to align with, who gets to live or die. This basically vanishes from Act 2 entirely until the end, then Act 3 asks you to lock in your faction choice and yet you immediately go back to playing both sides. I just ended up so disconnected and cold towards this story, because it felt like nothing I did mattered.
Yet, the way the game is playing out feels like there were meant to be choices and branching paths here, but they were either removed or never finished. Characters will wander into the narrative and just vanish, and there is clearly something missing here that would have made this made sense. You will ally to one faction, only to be killing them in the next mission, yet these actions will have no consequences and no one in the story recognises any of this playing out. You are positioned to be the core of this story, yet every development is written like you don’t exist in this story at all.
In fact, part of what makes Act 3 so impossible to follow is the way characters will be introduced as an ally, but then be a boss in the next mission, and then an ally again in the mission after that. And it is just never referenced, it is like every mission takes place in a vacuum and as soon as the mission is over it never happened. There are entire quest chains which make absolutely zero sense if you make certain choices. And this isn’t just for you, either, one of your companions can also be getting attacked by a faction in one mission and then in the next teaming with them and it is never referenced again. Just a complete and utter mess.
Like to me it seems clear the faction system was planned to be both far vaster, and far deeper, than the version we get in the released game. That each mission would give the player hard choices to make, which would be opening and closing missions off to you and sealing the fates of characters so they couldn’t show back up again. This is evidenced by the fact that the game includes an entire mechanic here which allows you to replay missions and make different decisions, but the mechanic has been added and the decisions haven’t been. However, the faction system we get in the actual game doesn’t actually do anything, so you are basically playing every branch of this story simultaneously on top of each other even though it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I just cannot believe for a second this was how the game was ever meant to be experienced when it was in production. You are just whatever faction the mission you are doing is at that time, but it is in a vacuum with no cause and effect or repercussions - despite the game constantly telling you there are.
I wish I could tell you everything outside of this is better, but like I say, this problem permeates through every inch of this. The game feels like a bolted together patchwork of borrowed ideas. It is the blandest, most shallow, thing you can imagine when you think of an Ubisoft open world. It is Ghost of Tsushima but with a fraction of the soul that game had.
In terms of the combat, it made a really bad first impression on me, and while it does get better, I am not sure it is ever exactly… good. Like you will absolutely enjoy some challenging fights, which feel super tight and clean, I'm parrying everything I feel I should have, any missed parries feel fair and like it's on me. It all feels like a properly scripted fight you’d see in a cutscene, but you are completely in control and it is awesome.
Sadly though, most of the fights I experienced, especially against bosses in the back half of the game, was like trying to play a fighting game online on a bad internet connection. Your parry will just not connect, or enemies attack in really odd cadences so trying to find a window to parry when the parry is as unforgiving as it is here is next to impossible and they love to ramp up the difficulty by having enemies who cannot be interrupted yet an enemy can sneeze across the room and it’ll interrupt what you doing. I can’t tell you the amount of times I died to enemies just spamming me with extremely long combos, no parry connected, their combo could not be stopped and just attacked through any attacks I made. Like you are defenceless and I genuinely do not know what the game expected me to do here. I am so glad this game has an easy mode, as I am not sure I could have finished this without it.
However, while the combat itself wasn’t great, the one thing I did genuinely enjoy in Rise of the Ronin - and the thing that meant that even 50 hours in I wasn't tired of this in a way I have been with games half as long this year - is everything around the combat. There is a vast range of weapons here, and each weapon has a deep collection of stances which basically give each weapon multiple completely diverse and unique ways to play. And even on the easiest difficulty, the game pushes you to really engage with this side of the game. You can't just pick a weapon and a stance and let it carry you through to the end, especially if you are just spamming abilities and not really learning how they function. Even on the easiest difficulty this approach will get you absolutely wrecked. You really need to play around with everything, and take the time to learn the quirks of both individual weapons, but also the various stances too and honestly this was just always a joy to do. When a weapon you tried earlier didn’t click, but then you get a new stance which really fits your playstyle and it just all comes together, like every few hours I would have one of those moments and it was just so fun, and so rewarding. Like technically what you are doing here is the same thing over and over again, but this level of experimentation meant the experience still had ways to feel fresh right until the credits rolled.
Oh, and the other thing I loved here is character creation and customisation. The character creator is deep and robust, you actually create two characters and there are no restrictions on you whatsoever with making changes throughout your playthrough. Like I literally swapped the genders of my Twins multiple times. You also get access to a transmog system basically immediately and there is a truly vast amount of looks in the game. I have no shame in admitting that a huge chunk of my playtime was probably just tweaking my characters and building and tweaking my outfits. Oh man, as a fashion game, character creation, photo mode addict? I was really feasting here.
So yeah, overall, it is hard to really know how to summarise Rise of the Ronin. I have played games this year with better characters, or stories, or more original ideas or whatever, but God was I burned out on those games by the end. Rise of the Ronin took me around 60ish hours to clear (it could be significantly longer if you wanted to do every bond mission, every side mission and 100 percent each map, which I absolutely did not want to do) and while I was definitely ready to move on when the credits rolled, it is probably the first game I have played this year where I wasn’t spending like the last 20 hours just growing a deep resentment for the game that it didn’t know when the right time was to stop.
In terms of whether I think you - the person reading this - should play it. I dunno, I think it is kind of a hard sell. If you like a lot of what you hear about this and haven’t played Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, play that instead. If you have consumed every piece of Ubisoft media and are gagging for one of their open worlds for some reason, then Rise of the Ronin offers you that, along with a surprising amount of mechanical depth for those who want to explore it, even if it also comes along with a lot of bad as well. So yeah, if that sells it to you, the price of entry right now is steep, but hopefully you can grab this in a sale at some point.
@Pizzamorg Thanks for the review - that really helps. When you talk about unforgiving and illogically timed parry windows, that just about seals the ‘no-deal’ for me. I think I would absolutely hate that.
And I do have plenty of Ubi-world games yet to play, including AC Odyssey, AC Valhalla, Horizon Forbidden West, to name a few. By the time I get through those, Ghost of Tsushima 2 will hopefully be out also. 😅
Anyways, I’ll keep an open mind because I like some of what you say about RotR like the character creation suite and the historical setting. Definitely will need a discount first.
“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”
Final Fantasy VII Remake Intergrade (PS5) Impression
Never played the original FFVII, so this remake is my intro to this installment.
Good:
Characters (mostly): On the most part, the characters are excellent with their own personalities. They drive the story along. Cannot stand Chadley however.
Music: Don't know how Japanese game developers do it, but they always bring out the best music. Incorporated well within the game world via jukeboxes and analog music boxes. Can listen to the tracks outside playing.
Battle System: That real-time semi-turnbased battle system is excellent. Like how it goes slow motion when entering the command menu.
Visuals: Atmospheric at times, and overall great visual style. Can look a bit blurry at times in performance mode.
Bad:
The Padding (OMG): There is just too much padding which unnecessarily lengthens the gameplay. Go into town and cannot progress the story until you do all the horrid "side" missions that usually involves fetching stuff / pets / people and keep backtracking. Also, that atrocious robot-arm section. Uhhh!!! What the hell? Square Enix could've just stuck with expanding character story-arcs without putting in so much padding.
Photomode: Really bare bones with filter setting minus a slider that should go with it. The filters are heavy-handed, and a slider to adjust its intensity really would help. And what the heck is with the automatic Square Enix copyright message put in the lower right-hand corner. No other photomode in existence does that.
@SingleStooge I loved Remake, but yeah, when you stretch a five hour prologue into a 40+ hour JRPG, there's gonna be a lot of padding.
@LtSarge It is always nice when a series with a lot of money put into it isn't afraid to go wild and drop the usually obligatory plot armor for its characters. While I'll likely never play it, TLOU Part II does sound like an excellent game that probably deserved the rave reviews it received back on release. tbh after seeing the "fan" reaction to it when the game was first leaked, I could tell Naughty Dog was really taking its narrative gloves off. A lot of people just don't enjoy being challenged by media they consume, and it shows in the way they react to it.
@colonelkilgore I couldn't get into the Just Cause series when I tried it back on the... good lord, the Xbox 360... but I've always admired its almost single-minded dedication to allowing the player to cause as much chaos as possible. Are those your screen captures, btw? Because they look awesome.
@Pizzamorg RotR sounds sort of dreadful. Really a shame, considering how much potential a Team Ninja game set in feudal Japan had. Even combat-wise, which has traditionally been such a strength for the developer.
Currently Playing: Metroid Prime 4: Beyond (NS2); Corpse Factory (PC)
@Ralizah nah they’re just shots I found across the webz when posting the review tbh.
You’re definitely in the majority that doesn’t really connect with the series (& I in the minority), which unfortunately for me will probably mean that Just Cause 4 will be the last one 😔
@Ralizah I just think it's nice when developers do something different and unexpected from what you would typically see from a story. It keeps things interesting. But some are just afraid of potential backlash, which is understandable.
I haven't submitted a piece in a while, but I'd like to start shining a light on a lot of the smaller, weirder games I somehow own on platforms like Nintendo Switch and Steam, as opposed to the same small set of bigger releases everyone seems to know about and play. It's a lot of fun going into a game with no idea what to expect because of how relatively obscure it is.
I'll start with a game I did a few runs of today.
#1: "Long Live The Queen"
Platform: Steam
Long Live The Queen is a fantasy simulation game where you guide the upbringing of Princess Elodie, imminently poised for coronation as Queen of her kingdom after the untimely death of her mother. Should be straight-forward, right? But without a Queen, there's a power vacuum, and you'll have to guide Elodie through a minefield of international tensions, assassination attempts, and power plays by corrupt nobles.
And it is almost literally a minefield, because this game is quite consciously filled with a variety of ways for your princess to die. More likely than not, your first attempt will end with the death of your princess. Thankfully, the game is short, as it's designed around experimentation and replayability, so you'll be able to play around with a variety of responses to the game's challenges.
How your princess tackles the problems in front of her are dictated by the education she receives. Every week, you'll put points into a variety of different skillsets that'll potentially come into play over the course of the game via skill checks (some more useful than others: being able to sense magic or react quickly to surprises is going to be far more useful than being skilled at caring for animals, for example). Seems simple enough, but this is complicated by the fact that the princess' emotional state dictates the effectiveness of the education she receives, which means you're also micro-managing her emotions every week by selecting options that'll raise and lower meters that dictate the character of her personality.
It's all a bit tedious at times, to be honest, and lacking the comparative depth of something like the Princess Maker series that this clearly draws heavy inspiration from. But there is something to be said for the flexibility of the system: just as there are many ways to lose this game, there are also many ways to survive to coronation, and several of the game's primary challenges can be tackled in a variety of ways. Maybe you utilize your knowledge of the region's sociopolitical conflicts to broker piece with enemies. Maybe you prevent assassination attempts by wising up to the plots of potential enemies ahead of time. Or maybe you muscle your way through the game as a militaristic dictator who uses her magical girl powers (yes, complete with a Sailor Moon-esque transformation and everything) to fry anyone who opposes her. There's an impressive level of variety in what can be accomplished from one run to the next.
Ultimately, this is missing some vital component to really keep me engaged. There's simultaneously too many options combined with gameplay and game progression that feel too streamlined. That said, if you happen to find it on sale for a few bucks, it'll likely keep you entertained well enough for an afternoon.
Senua's Saga: Hellblade II (Series X) - Impressions
I just finished this game, which took me about 8 hours to get through. I thought it was a phenomenal experience. The gameplay itself wasn't anything special, it was the story, the atmosphere and obviously the visuals that were the highlights of the game.
This has to be the most visually impressive game ever made, it's absolutely insane how detailed the world is. I can understand now why it took Ninja Theory over five years to make this game. I also thought the psychological aspect of the game was really cool, more games need to do this instead of being completely grounded.
As for the gameplay, I've heard some say that it's repetitive. I don't see that at all. The combat is rather challenging. The game has a dynamic difficulty setting so I'm guessing if you're bad at the game then it'll go easier on you and vice versa. But because the game was challenging for me, I never thought the combat was repetitive. In fact, I never truly got good at the game but I did become better over time. It was a great feeling whenever I got through a fight by parrying and dodging well. In other words, the combat was challenging but satisfying and I liked it.
In terms of the puzzle-solving though, I thought it was rather cool at first but then this aspect definitely got stale over time. All you do is go to certain points in an area and interact with something in order to either see a hidden symbol in the scenery or change the environment, thus opening up new paths that let you progress. That's basically all the puzzles in the game in a nutshell. So I didn't like this aspect as much as the combat as it slowed down the pacing.
Speaking of which, there is a lot of walking in this game but that's combined with narration and rich atmosphere. It made for a really immersive experience. Unfortunately, I didn't play the game with headphones but that would've elevated the experience even further. It's worth mentioning then that you have to be in the right mood in order to fully enjoy this game. It definitely leans more towards being an "experience" rather than a video game so to speak.
In short, I really liked this game and I thought the experience was absolutely exceptional. It's in my opinion one of the few truly "next-gen" experiences available on the market now. Even if it doesn't do anything new to push the medium forward, it definitely delivers a visually impressive experience that's unprecedented. It's worth playing for that alone.
On a side note, I just have to add how great it is to play a simple game like Hellblade II. In a time when we have games like God of War Ragnarok and Spider-Man 2 where you basically have to go through university courses in order to fully learn the game, it's very refreshing to have a game with a simple control scheme.
@LtSarge Thanks for the review. I’ve really been anticipating Hellblade II. How do you think the sequel compares to the first game? You mention the combat being simple in its core scheme and also the environmental puzzles, both which sound similar to the first game. I actually thought the puzzles in the first game could be challenging at times, but it sounds like they scaled those back. The combat in the first game was like a very limited and simplified version of God of War, and I don’t recall having to worry much about parrying. Perhaps despite its still being simple, the combat is more expansive than the first game?
And the first game was really all about the psychological aspects and the stellar audio design. Without spoiling too much, is that still an important part of the experience? The first game encouraged the player to use headphones to get the full effect of the voices in your head that would trick you and lie to you and the delusions you’d have so I would hope the sequel continues with something similar.
I’m glad it was a satisfying experience for you and for the first time I’m jealous of an Xbox exclusive. I didn’t care about Starfield (and still don’t), nor about HiFi Rush or Halo or Gears or Forza, etc. I mean, I’m curious about some of those properties, sure, but I don’t really hunger to play them in any meaningful way. Hellblade II though is something I really wish I had access to. For an 8 hr game though it’s not a system seller for me, not to mention I feel confident it will be ported to PS5 eventually. If the reports are true, they’ve got to make some money back on some of these games and GamePass subscriptions haven’t grown enough to offset the enormous development costs of some of these projects.
“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”
@Th3solution To be honest, I don't really remember much of the first Hellblade. I think I played it around five years ago. I do remember thinking that it was a decent experience though.
I think it's fair to say that the puzzles are more straightforward and the combat is more challenging compared to the first game. You'll be parrying a lot. The enemies have basic attacks for parrying and stronger attacks that you can't parry, so you need to dodge them instead. The game is very forgiving though. Even if you keep getting hit, you have multiple opportunities to recover. There are different enemy types and these are what makes the combat challenging.
The psychological aspects and immersive audio design are still present here. In fact, I'd say the devs have turned them up a notch compared to the first game. There were so many trippy situations that you'd normally find in e.g. psychological horror games or a Kojima game. I absolutely love moments like these.
I think it's great that Microsoft has decided to port their titles to PlayStation so that others get to play them as well. I cannot imagine Hellblade II not coming out on PS5 within a year or so. So yeah, I wouldn't bother getting an Xbox. It's cool though that there's actually a reason now for PlayStation-only gamers to follow these games as they might come out on PlayStation. Who knows, maybe some games shown on the Xbox showcase this Sunday will come out on PS5 as well.
@LtSarge I just picked up Hifi Rush, which is the first Xbox game I’ve bought in well over a decade… if Hellblade 2 gets ported I’ll buy that too. I know the reactions been mixed but I reckon that if I play it at the right time (when I’m fancying something a bit more chilled and narrative-heavy) I reckon I’ll feel similarly to you about it.
Forums
Topic: User Impressions/Reviews Thread
Posts 2,301 to 2,320 of 2,392
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic