E3 2021 will be a free to attend virtual event – despite reports suggesting the event’s organisers, the Entertainment Software Association, was planning to put some aspects behind a paywall. According to publishing sources speaking with VGC, the firm was considering charging a $35 fee for “premium pass”, which would include exclusive bonuses like on-demand game demos.
However, a spokesperson for the ESA confirmed that this year’s event will, in fact, be free for everyone: “I can confirm on behalf of the ESA that there will be no elements at E3 2021 that will be behind a paid-for pass or paywall.” VGC reports that publishers had been critical of the proposed payment plan, so the theory here is that it’s reneged on the proposal behind-the-scenes.
ESA intends for this year’s E3 – which it’s officially dubbing the Electronics Entertainment Experience, as opposed to the Electronics Entertainment Expo – to feature keynote sessions from publishers, as well as an awards show and potentially even game demos which fans will be able to stream online. There’s also chatter of virtual booths, as well as merchandise stores and potentially even exclusive press access.
But publishers will still need to stump up significant sums to the ESA in order to get involved, and while VGC reports that many are happy to get involved as a show of support, they’ll be reserving their “main” reveals for independent digital events. This means that E3 2021, scheduled to get underway from 13th June, could end up being a watered down showcase; it’s worth remembering that the likes of Sony, EA, and Activision had already abandoned the event before the pandemic cancelled last year’s show.
[source videogameschronicle.com]
Comments 11
Unpopular opinion: I wouldn't have minded paying a reasonable fee to access demos that the press gets to play. Would I pay for limited access to a hypothetical Elden Ring demo among other things? Yes.
paywall 😂 get real
The Paywall that started the end of E3 is the cost of floor space to attend.
@RBMango Yeah, seems far more reasonable to pay a lousy $35 than paying for an E3 floor pass + airfare + hotel; that's like 2 grand right there easily.
I still see no value to the publishers having to pay the ESA money to be featured. There are so many other ways they can get exposure for free, i would have thought that there is no planet on which this makes business sense
This is relatively good news to me. The scheduled time and place and the race to do it don't sound fun, and honestly the entire concept of flying to conferences in general always felt wasteful in general let alone in the "new world", and yet, sometimes there's something to be said for a pageant for the sake of the pageant to make something larger than life and cement it, to demarcate time and give it a physical form. Do we need graduation ceremonies, inauguration ceremonies, victory parades? No. Does anyone actually enjoy them? Not many. But they do demarcate that event and time.
For fans, what connects you to recent history in gaming and cements a console or generation or game in your head more. Layden standing in a stadium introducing Kojima walking on a beam of light? Iwata holding a Game Pad and never showing a console? Reggie and Shaun White doing a thing? Six Ninety Nine? Matrick imploding in real time with Call of Doggy? Or a tweet at 2:30pm on a Tuesday about a game with a trailer pasted?
E3, PSX, these things make the industry closer and grander than a media firm efficiently dispensing marketing materials. The expense of the physical expo probably isn't worth it in it's total costly form. But something digital to bring the industry and fans at the same place and time into one big gaming festival can't be replaced. 2020 should have demonstrated that well. It's not unique to gaming. Apple mastered that art in the black turtleneck days.
Scaled back maybe but I'm happy to hear of publisher support for the event.
Seeing as the whole event is essentially one big advert, especially now it's all online, going free seems a sensible decision.
Most people will only watch this because they dont got anything better to do.
E3 was in the bin long before corona, it will remain there,its sad because they did it to themselves greed etc. Charging horrendous amount of money to both attendees and publishers, and they probably realised most won't pay 35 dollars or whatever for early access demo that will be most likely available to everybody the next day.
Gone are the days of been excited for the yearly E3 event😕
They would expect people to pay to see adverts? That would all be available for free afterwards...
I've been to E3 twice in my life, and loved it both times. In both cases, different clans and in heretic 2's case cults that I belonged to (pc online was king back then) decided to go and meet each other in real life. Online friends I'd made from gaming became real-life friends after E3. I still stay in touch with many of them today. I'll always miss E3, even if it doesn't make as much sense now as it used to. Some things don't have to make sense. We call them traditions.
E3 was for a time with monthly magazines and limited communications. Where the media could get all of the upcoming news in one place and games companies fought for that publicity. Times have changes and new technologies have left E3 redundant.
The publishers should still keep the summer window for their own streams though, as is tradition.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...