Forums

Topic: Which multiplayer online game you guys recommend?

Posts 1 to 19 of 19

Shrek_Realista

Besides Battle Royale games and GTA Online, which multiplayer online you guys recommend? I play Battlefront 2 since 2019 but I'm getting bored already, I'm looking for a new multiplayer to play.

Shrek_Realista

nomither6

Online multiplayers been lacking for almost a decade now - not really nothing new and the same ol' stale rehashes - almost the exact opposite for single-player games .

All there's to play is your same ol' rehashed yearly NBA 2K , Call of Duty , Madden & Old as dirt GTA V .

Street fighter V is old , Overwatch is old , guilty gear strive just came out so thats new and i guess mk11.

overall - those are all i have to suggest is guilty gear and mk...

were in a sad state of multiplayer gaming.

people will say ''well what about rocket-league , knockout-city , etc'' and basically other low-end indie mobile app games that somehow winded up on console , instead of AAA multiplayer of the same quality-caliber as single-player games . rocket league is also old as sin.

edit : thank god for back 4 blood coming soon

Edited on by nomither6

nomither6

nomither6

lolwhatno wrote:

@nomither6 U sure don't know what you're talking about....Rocket league a and I quote "low-end indie mobile app games that somehow winded up on console , instead of AAA multiplayer of the same quality-caliber as single-player games"
First of all this game is not indie: Psyonix (the devs) have 148 employees!
nor is it a mobile game: A spin off was announced recently tho, a 2d game for mobile.
"That somehow landed on console": you make it sound as if this game is not popular, this game got 146 900 concurrent players....Impressive right, and that is only on steam not even all pc s but steam (now we have xbox, ps4, switch not counted).

I could say more,but...I'm lazy.

I'm sure rocket league started off small ; never said the game wasn't popular either , and if it seemed like i did , thats subjective and depends on who reads it that way .

nonetheless the game is old & its not of the same quality of a AAA game - that was my point . Its not a game someone could play everyday for more than a few hours on end . Rocket league isn't occupying anyone the same length as say Call of Duty or GTA Online . Two AAA games .

nomither6

nomither6

lolwhatno wrote:

@nomither6 Before answering, I just want to point out that this conversation has nothing personal, I have nothing against you, I just am defending my point of view. With that said:
"I'm sure rocket league started off small": Well they have to, like every new game, unlike the same call of duty that keeps releasing every year. That's the price to pay to make something new and original and using this as an argument is one of the reasons of the death of creativity in devs.
"the game is old": That isn't an argument, its graphic still hold up (did you ever play or watch the game being played?) and it runs butter smooth.
"the same quality of a AAA game": I have to disagree, the game screams AAA if AAA means top quality games with free updates. But if AAA means big explosions and complex hard to learn basics then no it's not.
"Its not a game someone could play everyday for more than a few hours on end": I play rocket league everyday ( at least in the summer....while I can) for a few hours and so does my brother.....So that's 2 of us not a lot but I'm pretty sure there are other people.

you're defending one game from an entire post I made that stated broad examples ; and you cherry-picked one game that you favor in your opinion - to refute my opinion ?? what's the point here .. I get that you like rocket-league but that doesn't deter from the fact that its an old game all the while single-player AAA games release by the year - the quality and variety of MP games doesn't compare to that of single-player games anymore , and the releases with MP games is lacking is my point. im not just talking about rocket-league in particular nor its technicalities - its still an old game instead of something new anymore. plenty of old games still hold-up , but people don't play them anymore because they moved on to something new and/or better - as it should be .

and the death of creativity in devs is because of suit-and-tie corporate slime-balls that got a hold of gaming when it became mainstream in the early 2010's ; gaming is ran by corporate people rather than gamers , and they don't take risks anymore because they don't have to , and they don't want to. Way to blame the industries laziness on the gamers instead of the devs . Thats another problem - gamers always disagreeing with each-other and tearing each-other down - but yet they tote that theres a such thing as a ''gaming community'' , when gamers as a whole do the opposite of what it means to be one . the devs can do no wrong , and any criticism is ignored, silenced , or conflicted .

As to your last paragraph - you can disagree all you want , its your opinion about it feeling like an AAA game , but yet there's really much of nothing to do in the game. We have different standards - you can tolerate less . Im not sorry that I want more from MP video-games instead of little simple arcade games. Otherwise whats the point of console generations ? I digress.

Edited on by nomither6

nomither6

nomither6

lolwhatno wrote:

@nomither6 This will be my last answer, because it's obvious to me that u're reading my replies without really reading them, only reading the facts to counter them which kills the idea of a discussion (you used the same arguments that I countered in my last reply!) and is useless for me first and then for you. With that said:
"you're defending one game from an entire post I made that stated broad examples" : You used this game as an exemple out of 2, since this game is the one I recommended to @Chief_Forasteiro (sorry for destroying ur topic btw) I had to defend it. And refuting one of your 2 examples seems plenty enough for me.
Your second paragraph actually is spot-on couldn't agree more and that's why I said one of the factors not the biggest nor the only.
" I want more from MP video-games instead of little simple arcade games" That was the cherry on top of the game for me, you sir proved that you don't know the game you're talking about (nothing wrong in that, the only thing wrong imo is that you're citing something you don't know and not doing it justice). The game isn't arcadey in any way, you should seriously check it out it's a great game!

P.s: I feel like you were trying to get personal in the last paragraph but I won't do that. (if you're wondering where, I'm talking about the standards thing)

With that said, I hope for you nothing other than the best (hopefully my "standards" doesn't affect this sentence lol), I hold nothing against you and tried to stay civil during it.
Have a great day sir

I am reading your reply - you just don't like my response because i'm not making a big deal out of such a simple point that i have to re-instate for the third time that : THE GAME IS OLD . My entire statement from the get-go was about the LACK OF VARIETY AND OLD MULTIPLAYER GAMES . You seen that i mentioned ''rocket-league'' , got butthurt , and retaliated with a knee-jerk response of '' b-but rocket league is a good and popular game! '' completely missing the point . Your continuously trying to make something out of nothing , because my opinion conflicts with yours about one game - all because of YOUR MISUNDERSTANDING , mind you.

''You used this game as an exemple out of 2'' - So you're just going to purposely look over the 6 other games I mentioned because it doesn't fit your narrative of trying to defend rocket-league and missing the entire point of my post. either you're that much of a fanboy , or maybe YOURE the one not reading what i say . Congrats on successfully derailing my response to start a useless debate over an opinion about rocket-league.

'' That was the cherry on top of the game for me, you sir proved that you don't know the game you're talking about'' - I have the game because it was free on PSN ; I have it installed , and can play it when I want , and have played it. Rocket league is a very simple/straight forward and barebones game .

''The game isn't arcadey in any way'' - Because mini-remote-controlled , mach-box cars playing soccer by ramming a humongous ball isn't ''arcadey'' according to your asinine & non-existent logic .

Dude , please do let that be your last response

Edited on by nomither6

nomither6

solocapers

@lolwhatno I agree with you, @nomither6 sounds like an angry, confused person, time-warped from the early 2000's and unable to accept the gaming industry changes as it did from 80's/90's arcade conversions, through to the advent of online MP and the triple A genre and so on.

He picks Rocket League as some sort of mobile game then gets defensive when you rightly point out that its far from then resorts to the old argument.

Yes sure, i'll give that its old when you look at it from a viewpoint 10-20 years ago when games died within a few years of release (barring your Unreal's, Quake etc) but its regularly updated with new content, modes, tournaments etc.

Multiplayer games these days are inherently services which are constantly updated to keep player counts high and continuous. Using age as a stick to beat it in with in 2021 is just stupid and ill informed.

@lolwhatno made a suggestion for a good multiplayer game and while @nomither6 may not like it (thats fine) their arguments against it are strawman at best and massively ill-informed at worst.

"Its not the same quality as a triple A game" Where does that come from? Whats the obsession with TRIPLE A games? Its incredibly well made, its more balanced than 99% of TRIPLE A MP games. Its about as pure a mutiplayer game as you can get and harks back to the golden days for me anyway, of Unreal Tournament where skill was pretty much the only factor in winning ( i.e not picking the best loadout, cardset or any other gamed variable to give boosts to a player class)

The gaming industry has been led by corporate types for decades, that's another strawman argument.

Angry old man waving at clouds rings a bell here.

Edited on by solocapers

solocapers

nomither6

solocapers wrote:

@lolwhatno I agree with you, @nomither6 sounds like an angry, confused person, time-warped from the early 2000's and unable to accept the gaming industry changes as it did from 80's/90's arcade conversions, through to the advent of online MP and the triple A genre and so on.

He picks Rocket League as some sort of mobile game then gets defensive when you rightly point out that its far from then resorts to the old argument.

Yes sure, i'll give that its old when you look at it from a viewpoint 10-20 years ago when games died within a few years of release (barring your Unreal's, Quake etc) but its regularly updated with new content, modes, tournaments etc.

Multiplayer games these days are inherently services which are constantly updated to keep player counts high and continuous. Using age as a stick to beat it in with in 2021 is just stupid and ill informed.

@lolwhatno made a suggestion for a good multiplayer game and while @nomither6 may not like it (thats fine) their arguments against it are strawman at best and massively ill-informed at worst.

"Its not the same quality as a triple A game" Where does that come from? Whats the obsession with TRIPLE A games? Its incredibly well made, its more balanced than 99% of TRIPLE A MP games. Its about as pure a mutiplayer game as you can get and harks back to the golden days for me anyway, of Unreal Tournament where skill was pretty much the only factor in winning ( i.e not picking the best loadout, cardset or any other gamed variable to give boosts to a player class)

The gaming industry has been led by corporate types for decades, that's another strawman argument.

Angry old man waving at clouds rings a bell here.

There was no reason for you to tag me , unless you have something to say to me. Going by your response , you definitely don't. nothing worth a rational discussion really. and im 24 - probably twice as young , and twice as cognitive since you want to throw shade at me. don't confuse my adoration for MP games with ''old age'' thats really stupid to say the least.

Edited on by nomither6

nomither6

nomither6

solocapers wrote:

@lolwhatno I agree with you, @nomither6 sounds like an angry, confused person, time-warped from the early 2000's and unable to accept the gaming industry changes as it did from 80's/90's arcade conversions, through to the advent of online MP and the triple A genre and so on.

He picks Rocket League as some sort of mobile game then gets defensive when you rightly point out that its far from then resorts to the old argument.

Yes sure, i'll give that its old when you look at it from a viewpoint 10-20 years ago when games died within a few years of release (barring your Unreal's, Quake etc) but its regularly updated with new content, modes, tournaments etc.

Multiplayer games these days are inherently services which are constantly updated to keep player counts high and continuous. Using age as a stick to beat it in with in 2021 is just stupid and ill informed.

@lolwhatno made a suggestion for a good multiplayer game and while @nomither6 may not like it (thats fine) their arguments against it are strawman at best and massively ill-informed at worst.

"Its not the same quality as a triple A game" Where does that come from? Whats the obsession with TRIPLE A games? Its incredibly well made, its more balanced than 99% of TRIPLE A MP games. Its about as pure a mutiplayer game as you can get and harks back to the golden days for me anyway, of Unreal Tournament where skill was pretty much the only factor in winning ( i.e not picking the best loadout, cardset or any other gamed variable to give boosts to a player class)

The gaming industry has been led by corporate types for decades, that's another strawman argument.

Angry old man waving at clouds rings a bell here.

''@lolwhatno made a suggestion for a good multiplayer game and while @nomither6 may not like it (thats fine) their arguments against it are strawman at best and massively ill-informed at worst.''

Its also clear you got some-sort of bias in favor of the guy , despite you agreeing with him prior ; but this quoted comment here just solidifies the lack of impartiality . he made a suggestion that i didn't care to bother him about , i didn't even read his first comment in the thread - so don't make it seem as if I came at the guy to argue with him about his suggestions. he had issue with my response and wanted to debate about it , he brought it on himself.

don't start crap and then blame the person you're going against under the guise of some ''victim'' mentality. he could've easily just left it alone .

Edited on by nomither6

nomither6

solocapers

@nomither6 "and twice as cognitive" Really?! Throwing the childish, baseless insults about? Cmon man, wind your neck in.

You earlier said "Online multiplayers been lacking for almost a decade now" suggesting you've been online gaming for a considerable time longer than that. Given you are 24 that doesn't really give you much time to truly have a wide grasp of playing prior to that. Otherwise, what's the point in making that statement.

Anyway, I'm out of here. @nomither6 Didn't want to make it feel like a personal attack on you, so apologies if it came over that way.. however I did feel that your argument, specifically over Rocket League was based on you just not liking it.

Which is fine... just moaning about a game being old is daft.

If its still fun for millions of people it must be doing something right.

Edited on by solocapers

solocapers

TraCuz-

Sheesh I came in here to give suggestions instead I got a week's serving of salt xD

Currently Playing:

Rainbow 6: Siege, Kingdom Hearts 2 (1st time), Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen

PSN: TraCuz-

NedStarksGhost

@lolwhatno I will preface this by saying I haven't read everything. But Rocket League is a load of fun, top quality and genuinely would suggest anyone who wants a quick multiplayer game to try it.

Whilst I'd also describe Rocket League as football with cars (it's the best way to explain it), after playing it you'll soon realise it's not quite that and very unique.

I've stopped playing it personally as I just got too into it, played religiously and in the end decided I wanted to play more stuff. That to me is how good of a game it is!

Edit: just skimmed through the thread. Poor OP just wanted some game suggestion!

Edited on by NedStarksGhost

NedStarksGhost

colonelkilgore

Did someone start an argument and not invite me… sheesh! 🤬

**** DLC!

Th3solution

@colonelkilgore Well sir, I’m not sure what all the arguing is about anyways — Single Player >>> Multiplayer Games anyways 😜

“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”

Elodin

@Chief_ForasteiroI would recommend Elder Scrolls Online (ESO). Personally I don't much care for it anymore, but that is only due to them switching to level scaling the monsters years ago. For me that kills all rpg elements. However if that doesn't bother you and I know it doesn't bother most. It is a fantastic MMO. For shooters I still enjoy SWBF2, but I mostly play heros v. Heros more light sabers is always fun. The big one now of course is FF14. I haven't played it myself, but being number 1 must mean it's good for most.

Elodin

  • Page 1 of 1

This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.