Playstation 3 News, PS3 Reviews, Videos and Opinion - PushSquare.com

Why Do People Promote A Single System Future? – “Twiggy” The PushSquare Opinionator

Say No To A Single Platform Future.

Say No To A Single Platform Future.

In the past few weeks I’ve endured some utter tripe disguised as journalism. “How Activision can kill the Playstation”. “Why Sony should stop producing hardware”. Etc. The usual link-baiting nonsense that I won’t dignify with the hits the authors so desperately crave. The usual tosh that seems to promote a single-system future. Reading such articles makes me wonder though. Why on Earth would anyone want a single system future?

The very root of what drives most industry is competition. People make great products, then others make equally great products and as such the former products have to get better. Gaming is no different. Mario was pushed by Sonic. Nintendo were pushed by Sony. Sony are being pushed by Nintendo and Microsoft. It’s business and it works, without competition we can’t imagine progress.

Imagine a future in which Nintendo holds the future. Or Microsoft, or Sony. It doesn’t matter which manufacturer you imagine as the sole force, just pretend there is only one. That manufacturer would be able to sell their product at a ridiculous price and they’d see no pressure to lower it. As the only system available, people would be forced to buy it regardless. This would be a future much unlike the present we are experiencing now, where Sony are being forced to lower the price of their system because of the lower prices of the XBOX 360 and Nintendo Wii. Who wins? The consumer, because there’s no doubt by the end of this year we’re likely to see lower priced XBOXs, Wiis and, most importantly for this example, Playstation 3s.

And what of the actual hardware itself. Out of the box the Playstation 3 differentiated itself from competitors by offering a wide array of media capabilities. The XBOX 360 provided the excellent Live service and the Wii offered motion controls. What would be the need for any of these features in a single console future? There’d be no need for differentiation, no need for unique selling points, no need for progress. Without the competitor the console can stagnate and wither, because people will buy it anyway. Again, without the option there can be no progress.

The only thing that could ever benefit from a single console future are the availability of games. The consumer could buy whatever games they want, and I can’t find an argument for how the quality would dip on a single platform, I doubt it would. However, the loss of the “exclusive” game would be depressing in the least. Games like LittleBigPlanet would fail to ever capture any imagination outside the boxes of “exclusive”. It’s these games that capture our hearts and shape the console into being a personality. How could this ever come through when every publisher is fighting for prominence on a single platform?

I appreciate people want to be able to play everything that’s released and I understand it’s expensive to buy all the consoles. But the fact is, none of us should be wishing for a single platform future because, while Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo compete for market share and revenue – we, the consumer, are getting the very best they have to offer. Take two of those companies away and we all lose.

“Twiggy” is an anonymous PushSquare columnist who has been spotted in three major cities across the globe. It’s rumoured he’s on the run from the British monarchy who accused him of treason.

Previous entries in the “Twiggy” range:

  • Bill777
    I agree with your analysis of the undesirability of a single system future for gaming, but I was hoping for a bit of reflection on why such "tripe" might be infecting gaming journalism. It may be that journalists in the area of technology and gaming are playing with the same structure you suggest, namely they are attempting to back on side or another in a competitive environment in order to gain some notoriety without any really desire for the competitive environment itself, on which they feed, to end. There are some great interviews with top journalists about the future of journalism in general at http://www.ourblook.com/component/option,com_se... which I have found useful on subjects like this.
  • LordCancer
    Neither of the 3 manufactures should be the sole consoles provider. I think you miss the point by claiming that's what we want, No it isn't. What we want is an agreed upon spec that lets hardware manufactures like samsung, lg, sharp etc manufacture a compatible device that will run all software programmed for it. You know like dvd.

    Ultimately what we want is for developers to focus on developing the very best game they can for one spec. To me its very frustrating to see some of the best ideas potential not realized because the focus was split between two, three or more teams simply to get it to run on all platforms.

    We want games to be excepted like movies but, how silly would it be if you had to have a specific player to play a specific studios movie?

    The reason first party games are always better is because they can put there full focus into maximizing for a single spec, they don't have to worry about if I do this will it work on another machine.

    Also from a consumer point of view it's getting really old having to buy two or three $300 plus machine to play all the exclusives.

    I think the competition should be between the software and I think there should be one platform to maximize all developers potential to make great games.

    I think the 3 market skue stifles innovation, how does a split market between sony, nintendo and microsoft benefit those who make software when they have to make 3 versions to break even?

    As for the hardware side of things, everything in the box was some variation of hardware made by ibm, nvidia, amd those are the guys on the front lines of hardware innovation... not sony or microsoft who just put it in a box. I think that continues even with a one world console.

    I don't think you loose interesting titles like little big planet either, similar to niche movie markets there will always be a base for that stuff and with one player I think you expand the available base for people willing to give lbg a shot, you cant say the same for microsoft and nintendo only owners.

    I'm glad to see activision Kotick’s say what he did, I think its a step in the right direction. The market needs to change from its current cycle that is inefficient and costly to everyone from the developers to the consumer.

    I think it only happens when the 3rd party developers and the consumer says we've had enough. 3rd parties are the life blood of this industry. It should be about the software, about the games and not proprietary technology which is old hat and needs to die.
  • zee
    The MMO ad is HIGHLY distracting. Seriously, kill the ad. I could HARDLY read the article
  • Mr. Typo
    This article gave me a new found appreciation for Sony and Nintendo. I hope this story gets alot of views.
  • Alex
    If we could stop worrying about which console to play games on and just focus on games we would all be better off.
  • Gunchrote
    This is good. I don't know why people are so fierce about how a console sells, as if they have stock in the company. Just play the games you fanboy losers.
blog comments powered by Disqus